Browny
Smash Hater
Link to original post: [drupal=1047]SA's way of dealing with Metaknight[/drupal]
I'm not going to post this in tactical/general since that is where intelligent discussion goes to die. It appears this section of SWF is much more easier to talk/debate with
Anyway here in South Australia there are hardly any MK mains and brawl isnt taken THAT seriously. We all know hes the best but aren't about to change mains to him and most of the top players here won't use him. There really isnt an MK problem. But despite this, the tournament organiser here, Jamage, came up with a simple idea to make brawl tourneys more fun for the rest of us who dont feel like counterpicking to beat an MK user.
You can only win one game per set with MK, then he is banned for the remainder of the set. You can use him a maximum of 2 games in any set where you may lose twice, or lose the first match and then win the second, after which you must change character. All stage ban/counterpick/strikes are allowed for MK.
Upon reading countless threads here about dealing with MK, in my OPINION, this is the best method I've heard for keeping MK fair for competitive play. It deals with the whole 'MK is the counterpick for the entire cast' argument in that the MK player is forced to choose another character, which the opponent can then counterpick against while allowing MK to be a main in a tournament and not unfairly ban MK when his mains have put all their practice into him.
Now of course my experience on MK dominance is non-existant as he is not overplayed here in Australia, but I'd like to see what other people think of this who may happen to frequent tournaments where every 2nd person either mains/counterpicks you with MK.
Good/bad idea? Discuss
I'm not going to post this in tactical/general since that is where intelligent discussion goes to die. It appears this section of SWF is much more easier to talk/debate with
Anyway here in South Australia there are hardly any MK mains and brawl isnt taken THAT seriously. We all know hes the best but aren't about to change mains to him and most of the top players here won't use him. There really isnt an MK problem. But despite this, the tournament organiser here, Jamage, came up with a simple idea to make brawl tourneys more fun for the rest of us who dont feel like counterpicking to beat an MK user.
You can only win one game per set with MK, then he is banned for the remainder of the set. You can use him a maximum of 2 games in any set where you may lose twice, or lose the first match and then win the second, after which you must change character. All stage ban/counterpick/strikes are allowed for MK.
Upon reading countless threads here about dealing with MK, in my OPINION, this is the best method I've heard for keeping MK fair for competitive play. It deals with the whole 'MK is the counterpick for the entire cast' argument in that the MK player is forced to choose another character, which the opponent can then counterpick against while allowing MK to be a main in a tournament and not unfairly ban MK when his mains have put all their practice into him.
Now of course my experience on MK dominance is non-existant as he is not overplayed here in Australia, but I'd like to see what other people think of this who may happen to frequent tournaments where every 2nd person either mains/counterpicks you with MK.
Good/bad idea? Discuss