Alien Vision
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2011
- Messages
- 906
This link will provide you the information that you need to carry out this debate: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43710936/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/?gt1=43001
The way I am going to structure this will allow us to see both sides clearly and to be able to discuss things without any misconceptions. What we are doing is seperating the real ''evidence'' from the information that can't be proven. The top part will be the ''evidence'' that supports the ethical proportions of this case. The bottom part will supply information that may not be in fact ''evidence'', but will serve as a catalyst for us to question the ethical foundation as it was presented. This is a group effort, and not just my voiced opinion. So if you have any ideas for either side, please apply them as shown. The two categories are: ''The Evidence'', and ''The Puzzle Pieces''. What you are doing is applying your own ''evidence'' you can blatantly see in this case, and your own personal opinion about it. We will debate on either side as we go along.
For an example - Say someone said ''This guy should've known what he was doing L0lol01!''. Then we may debate that we really don't know what was going through his head then. We really can't say **** because it's all hindsight now. Everything happened so fast, the adrenaline, a bunch of psychological factors, etc.
Now, I hope I stated all the information you need to carry this on. I started it off for you guys. Now it's your turn to add to the categories. Either one is fine.
1. The camera angle does not fully justify that Parker was indeed unconscious nor does it justify that Jerome could've thought Parker was reaching for a weapon causing him to react the way he did.
The way I am going to structure this will allow us to see both sides clearly and to be able to discuss things without any misconceptions. What we are doing is seperating the real ''evidence'' from the information that can't be proven. The top part will be the ''evidence'' that supports the ethical proportions of this case. The bottom part will supply information that may not be in fact ''evidence'', but will serve as a catalyst for us to question the ethical foundation as it was presented. This is a group effort, and not just my voiced opinion. So if you have any ideas for either side, please apply them as shown. The two categories are: ''The Evidence'', and ''The Puzzle Pieces''. What you are doing is applying your own ''evidence'' you can blatantly see in this case, and your own personal opinion about it. We will debate on either side as we go along.
For an example - Say someone said ''This guy should've known what he was doing L0lol01!''. Then we may debate that we really don't know what was going through his head then. We really can't say **** because it's all hindsight now. Everything happened so fast, the adrenaline, a bunch of psychological factors, etc.
Now, I hope I stated all the information you need to carry this on. I started it off for you guys. Now it's your turn to add to the categories. Either one is fine.
The Evidence
1. Jerome shot Parker 5 more times while he was already lying on the floor with a bullet in his head.
The Puzzle Pieces
1. The camera angle does not fully justify that Parker was indeed unconscious nor does it justify that Jerome could've thought Parker was reaching for a weapon causing him to react the way he did.
