-ACE-
Gotem City Vigilante
So, my sense of empathy for top players isn't perfect, kinda like I'll never really know what it's like to give birth. With that said, I think floating players (allowing them to skip pools) isn't fair.
Arguments for floating include burnout, not being able to eat, not being able to sleep, rarity of upsets, etc.
I feel like having endurance/stamina is part of the tournament. If you win more, you have to play more. It's always been that way, and that is a skill tested for in tournament. For some players, lack of mental stamina is one of the greatest things holding them back. Do they deserve a win without having earned it, in ANY case (aside from DQ), because of this smash-related weakness they have? No, they have to fight through that weakness. This is a skill that has always been tested for and some people want it removed (but not for everyone).
Recently, I've heard some people say it is ridiculous to force top players to not sleep or eat for 48 hours before they play to truly see who is the best. Sure, that's ridiculous, but so are examples saturated in exaggeration. Is it truly impossible for top players to eat or sleep at a national? Personally, I don't think there's anything stopping them from bringing a nutritious snack or shake to keep them going (hopefully carrying a "heavy" backpack around won't be the next outside challenge that warrants a free win). If non-smash related activities contribute to the lack of sleep factor, should they matter? I personally don't think whether or not a player has a full time job should warrant a free win. Does traveling a long distance to attend the tournament warrant a free win? Of course a Las Vegas smasher has it easier at EVO than a smasher from China, but I still think they should start in the same round: the same as everyone else.
Regarding rarity of upsets, I truly believe ALL DATA ON UPSETS IS OUTDATED. With community growth, 20XX, countless YouTube videos of top players, numerous extensive guides, and tons of streams, "randomguy69" is a lot better today than he was in 2006. Hell, even last year. Upsets are on the rise, and you never know who the next InfiniteNumbers will be. And even if upsets didn't happen, it's still a FREE WIN. As in, you didn't even have to play. Top players have the best mental stamina out of everyone. They're used to it more so than anyone else. The thought of lower level players not only having to outplay them, but to have to play many more sets (more sets than they've ever played before, truly testing the limits of their tournament stamina for the FIRST time) in the process seems a bit crazy. Top players already have seeding on their side, this tips the scale of fairness imo.
How mentally taxing is it for a top player to play pools? Really? Ask any of them how pools were at any tournament, they'll respond with a funny face "free af". Just saying.
There are many lower and mid level players that are forced to conquer the same challenges the top players are complaining about. Many top players want more bo5 sets while simultaneously complaining about playing too much.
Let's be real here. This is ****ing bogus (IMO). I'd like to hear opinions.
Arguments for floating include burnout, not being able to eat, not being able to sleep, rarity of upsets, etc.
I feel like having endurance/stamina is part of the tournament. If you win more, you have to play more. It's always been that way, and that is a skill tested for in tournament. For some players, lack of mental stamina is one of the greatest things holding them back. Do they deserve a win without having earned it, in ANY case (aside from DQ), because of this smash-related weakness they have? No, they have to fight through that weakness. This is a skill that has always been tested for and some people want it removed (but not for everyone).
Recently, I've heard some people say it is ridiculous to force top players to not sleep or eat for 48 hours before they play to truly see who is the best. Sure, that's ridiculous, but so are examples saturated in exaggeration. Is it truly impossible for top players to eat or sleep at a national? Personally, I don't think there's anything stopping them from bringing a nutritious snack or shake to keep them going (hopefully carrying a "heavy" backpack around won't be the next outside challenge that warrants a free win). If non-smash related activities contribute to the lack of sleep factor, should they matter? I personally don't think whether or not a player has a full time job should warrant a free win. Does traveling a long distance to attend the tournament warrant a free win? Of course a Las Vegas smasher has it easier at EVO than a smasher from China, but I still think they should start in the same round: the same as everyone else.
Regarding rarity of upsets, I truly believe ALL DATA ON UPSETS IS OUTDATED. With community growth, 20XX, countless YouTube videos of top players, numerous extensive guides, and tons of streams, "randomguy69" is a lot better today than he was in 2006. Hell, even last year. Upsets are on the rise, and you never know who the next InfiniteNumbers will be. And even if upsets didn't happen, it's still a FREE WIN. As in, you didn't even have to play. Top players have the best mental stamina out of everyone. They're used to it more so than anyone else. The thought of lower level players not only having to outplay them, but to have to play many more sets (more sets than they've ever played before, truly testing the limits of their tournament stamina for the FIRST time) in the process seems a bit crazy. Top players already have seeding on their side, this tips the scale of fairness imo.
How mentally taxing is it for a top player to play pools? Really? Ask any of them how pools were at any tournament, they'll respond with a funny face "free af". Just saying.
There are many lower and mid level players that are forced to conquer the same challenges the top players are complaining about. Many top players want more bo5 sets while simultaneously complaining about playing too much.
Let's be real here. This is ****ing bogus (IMO). I'd like to hear opinions.
Last edited: