Are male Pokemon stonger than female Pokemon? (no im not sexist)

[Ban3]

is it true? because what i heard is that females are faster, males are stronger. can someone confirm?

 

[Tr4ce]

Its not true!

 

[RedPeppers]

HAHAHA I've never heard anything about this! Major load of crap.

 

[Bowser King]

100% lie. The only diffrences are some certain looks for certain pokemon.

 

[ss118]

>.>'
just wow

 

[Ban3]

thank you lol

 

[Organous]

Someone's dipped a bit too heavily into Jusenkyo springs. Gender by itself doesn't do anything, but in very specific scenarios it can mean something. The nidorans, for example, have significantly different traits. Tauros and Miltank are also the same like the Nidorans. Of course, the attraction moves will also affect those of differing genders (which I think is just nuts, but this isn't the forum for that).

 

[Terios the Hedgehog]

Someone's dipped a bit too heavily into Jusenkyo springs. Gender by itself doesn't do anything, but in very specific scenarios it can mean something. The nidorans, for example, have significantly different traits. Tauros and Miltank are also the same like the Nidorans. Of course, the attraction moves will also affect those of differing genders (which I think is just nuts, but this isn't the forum for that).

Although interesting to note is (in most cases) Males/Females ratio is 50/50 or 87.5/12.5. Meaning that If you want someone with Attract a Female is your best bet as most opponents will be male.

 

[lowradiation8989]

Although interesting to note is (in most cases) Males/Females ratio is 50/50 or 87.5/12.5. Meaning that If you want someone with Attract a Female is your best bet as most opponents will be male.

That is a good point. Probably the only true benefit of one gender over another.

 

[Silverline]

Actually, what this stemmed from was the fact that back in the G/S/C era, any Pokemon that wasn't an entirely female species couldn't have max attack IV's without being male. It was this that led to the whole 'Male Pokemon are stronger' saying, since it was impossible to get a superiorly strong female in that era. However this has LONG since changed and is no longer relevant.

 

[Mike87]

I dont think that the males are stronger than females.

 

[Silverline]

I dont think that the males are stronger than females.

They aren't anymore, but they were back when they were first introduced.

 

[Mewter]

No differences

If any, there are only different sprites and evolutions.

 

[Zook]

Pokemon without genders are the strongest.

 

[9Kplus1]

Male, Naughty Garchomp:

31/31/31/31/28/31

Female, Naughty Garchomp:

31/31/31/31/28/31

<_<.