Recent content by SuperSmashGod

It would only make the game that much better

Ok fine then. But i am not trying to be mean to anyone here Irene this is just the way i talk. I am just a little frustrated. I also just call moderators mods sometimes. I wasn't trying to offend you or N3ON.

Must be some glitch. i only responded once. I know how rules on forums work, so i don't need to be reminded of what not to do. My statements on success are in reference to my conversation with the moderator. It's not my personal view. It's in context to a statement i made earlier. Its not my...

I was clear from the beginning what I meant when I said success. But I said it originally to the moderator though. The problem here is that I was having a discussion with the moderator, everything I said about Nintendo is in reference to my conversation with the mod. Everyone else that has been...

I'm not sure about that one. I'll have to look that up. The NES still was practically a monopoly though so no point arguing that.

I thought we already cleared the whole it doesn't need to beat it's competitors to be a success thing? Setting aside the whole personal views on what is considered success in the gaming industry(there are no consistent grounds for a success it can be whatever you see fit really), I was...

The NES was practically a monopoly. But if we wanna get technical there were other competitors like the Atari for example. They where absolutely no competition, and I'm pretty sure they where near dead consoles when the NES arrived on the scene.But competitors none the less. So, I'll give you...

I'm talking about the ultimate success, beating the competition. nothing else was relevant in my discussion because that's what it was about. Of course they can be successful in terms of making money in general. But im not talking about that. I'm talking about them beating the competing. And...

It was practically a monopoly, but if we do want to get really technical it did have competiton. Barley any competent competiton, but competiton still so I'll give you that.

Wasn't talking about financial success. I was saying success in winning the competition against it's competitors.

I heard it was near the same power or something along those lines.

I dont understand why you dont say this to me directly, but instead go all passive agresive. Anyway i never said that. I specifically stated that the NES was a monopoly, meaning it had no competition. So it's success was inevitable. I'm acknowledging the fact is was inevitably successful so...

That's cool and all. What I'm saying though is gaming never died. There was no saving gaming. This isn't about how wide spread gaming is. It's about the fact gaming was still going on period, therefore gaming wasn't saved It. Never went away. The statement, "Nintendo saved gaming" is still wrong.

Oh come on Roy! G Tier ?!! And Cloud should be numbah one.

Why do i need to site common gaming knowledge? If i told you the sky was blue would you ask me to site it? If you don't know this why don't you look it up? You must think i'm lying if u want me to link information things your average gamer that keeps up with gaming news knows. Which is fine of...