Recent content by hariooo

As much as I like the current stagelist it's only ever been culled. Introducing new tournament legal stages would be a breath of fresh air just in terms of spurring a lot of new discussions over matchups and stage specific tech that has been relatively stagnant. The logistics are the big issue...

Hax is such a fraud did he really imply the XX in 20XX was like 15 or 16 or something? Bah go back to quad-shining someone's shield, then getting stuck while they buffer a roll to reset back to neutral.

ur gentlewavepivot shenanigans are going to look stupid if you drop a late platform stomp to knee and lose the set. if you want to actually win just make sure you hit the basic knee setups/common edgeguards 99% of the time.

No other character can put out such a strong attack from anywhere else on the map within a second or so. There's a lot of value in that.

Using the same trigger is actually fine.

Falcon is pretty underrated. No one else has the footspeed+aerial kill potential that he has.

What's the common resolution for the issue where I can host but not connect? And when I say not connect I mean I join a lobby and get the ?ms stuff going on. If I retry joining, 1/3 of the time it'll work and the rest of the time it just leads to weird disconnections and freezes. Hosting works...

Smash 4 is that way.

You don't seem to know what extrapolate means. How is that my "mistaken judgment"? There was a lot of rolling. I provided an example. He was wrong but no one is holding him to nearly the same standards. I haven't attacked anyone else personally in this thread but you seem to have no problem...

Luigi will never be top tier in Melee but wavedashing makes him viable. Anything can affect balance. Does it make the game more competitive? Most people (who actually play the game competitively) would answer yes to that question for wavedashing and crouch cancelling.

Look. That guy said he watched the entire set and didn't see much rolling. I didn't troll through 8 hours of twitch footage looking for the perfect moment to prove him wrong. I looked at the first 15 seconds of the first game of the set that he specifically mentioned and saw 7 rolls in 5...

You're talking about context? I posted a link with a timestamp, dude, how much more context do you need? People can watch it and figure it out for themselves. Their conclusion may be reasonably different from mine but "I didn't see them roll a lot" by that guy just isn't true. So rolling is...

That wasn't cherry picking. That was the first 10-15 seconds of the first game of the set he referred to. It was easy to find. Why do I have to do a full analysis? I notice that you're not applying the same standards to anyone else in this thread. Confirmation bias would be watching any part of...

Is this supposed to be you making a public example of me? If you wanted to deal with this through PM's then you would have PM'd me. Don't make a public proclamation of how reasonably you want to deal with this when you're the one who started out by calling me an "aggressive ****ter". You're...

I'm not exaggerating at all. That's the spirit of many posts on this board and if you're complaining about the circlejerk then you should lay off the self-righteous posts of who belongs where.