Recent content by Crimson)S(hadow

wes, as much as i hate your ugly *** fake double shine where you waveland after the second shine because you can't tell if you jumpcanceled or not, you're right about this. mango's falco is utterly invincible to spacies, if he's really serious he wouldn't lose at all.

Fox 1) M2K with a good controller 2) Mango 3) M2K with his current controller 4) Javi

fine. if all you guys are gonna try to do is insult me and futily attempt to prove me wrong rather than actually trying to understand what i have to say then i won't be nice anymore. i said that game design is abstract in which you can argue skill demand is bad or good for gameplay. the only...

hmm sorry pocky, i admit you two are using words that i am not farmiliar with. i changed it

"SC2 is a ****ty sequal that takes 50 apm because they made the gameplay and physics so much less skill demanding." i openly admit this is an merely an insult. whther or not it is true and adds to the argument of gameplay is irrelevent, for the argument itself is irrelevent and arbitrary. this...

i am sorry, you asked me 'what is a flaw'. i thought that you wanted what i thought that was, i did not expect that you wanted a dictionary definition of a word. 'flaw –noun 1. a feature that mars the perfection of something; defect; fault: beauty without flaw; the flaws in our plan. 2...

in my words, i would say a flaw is something that leads to the downfall of something. lets use example of BW's feature of workers not mining a mineral patch automatically when rallied to a mineral patch. for reasons unstated, you have said that to you this feature does not 'make sense'. i...

pocky, it is true you later said that but originally you said 'how anyone could not think that some of the 'apm-requiring' mechanics of bw aren't complete nonsense is beyond me. may as well require the player be jump roping while playing' which is why we were arguing about game design. we had...

yes, i do make it sound like any reduction in skill demand is bad, but again that it not my point and that is not what i mean. i mean that any change to BW at all would mean it is no longer BW, no longer what is generally revered as a masterpiece by competitive players of all game genres. SC2 is...

what i'm trying to get at is that to infer meanings can possibly lead to putting words into pocky's mouth because of it, therefore i interpret his question literally. i've suggested to pocky possiblilities of what he might have meant by 'make sense'. from when he says rallying workers to a...

sheridan, no where in the quoted statement have i said that features in BW are what OUGHT to be. perhaps you inferred,from when i was stating what IS in BW, that i think they are what RTS SHOULD be. but all i said is that the feature is there, and hint that i personally like it. in my previous...

i said that it makes sense because it is programmed that way. nothing in this statement is incorrect; the game AI, when rallied to a mineral patch, is not programmed in a way so that workers automatically start mining. this statement is completely true, and i am simply responding to your...

you said 'vids were posted illegally, company took legal action sounds like you're just being whiny because you don't like sc2 how anyone could not think that some of the 'apm-requiring' mechanics of bw aren't complete nonsense is beyond me. may as well require the player be jump roping...

whats funny is that i've actually read and addressed every point pocky made in all his posts thoroughly disproving them, and he goes back and says that i haven't. i disproved him because i actually DID understand what he said, and also i understood where he was coming from so much so that i...

you're backing down because you've finally realized your wrong. you keep bringing up things and i keep disproving them, your whole argument about the gameplay is futile, because: a) you are a 150-160 apm player who is arguing that he hates the mechanics of BW and thinks it should be changed...