Sorry for the off-topic post, but on the orriginal post (first post), it says Falco vs Wolf is 55:45 in favour of Falco. Is that a mistake or is that what you guys determined? I wasn't following the discussions, so I don't know if that is what you guys determined.
We changed that recently. It turned out that Wolf (and other characters) can survive Chainspikes by teching. Falco still has the advantage over Wolf but it's not that bad anymore. Falco is tough but still managable for Wolf.
@kailo
I do get your point but:
1.) I'd like to hear more match-up specific stuff from you. I mean it's obvious that Snake is a better character but that doesn't necesarily give him the advantage. Olimar has better KO power, better grabs, same range, deals a lot more damage and is smaller than Wolf but Wolf still has the advantage over Olimar. Do you get my point? Wolf still has quite a bunch of things gong for him in this match-up and I'd like you to adress some of my points:
- How does Snake punish a well ranged SHFF Bair? Grenades don't hit him and only the 2nd hit of ftilt / 3rd hit of jabs will hit him. Both can be Powershielded
- How can Snake prevent losing a stock when Wolf dthrows him down the ledge?
- How does Snake get around a juggle trap? Wolf uair beats Snake's dair and if he airdodges Wolf can punish him with usmash and thus juggle trap him again
That's quite a bunch of things Wolf has and we still haven't consiered the fact that Wolf won't die as easily as most characters do nor the fact that Wolfs mobility is superior and gives some hit+run opportunities
2.) Give me one reason why it's supposed to be 65/35. That number has to be one of the most absurd exaggerations I've ever heard. I could accept 55/45 but 65/35 ... that's basically a hard counter match-up and it's not that bad no matter what you say. Especially since you didn't even mention one of the strenghts Wolf has in this match-up it seems basically like you're ignoring everything Wolf has on Snake.
You say the number is wrong so
you have to prove it. All you brought up wasn't match-up specific. OK Snake deals tons of damage and KOs extremely well and has amazing camping we know that. But the way you write it looks like you don't even
want to see the things Wolf has on Snake. It honestly looks like you ignore any reasonable input and come up with "but Snake is top and Wolf isn't". OK...so what? Wolf has tools to deal with Snake and as long as you don't prove that Snake has so much going for him that it's a freaking
hard-coountermatch-up I can't really take that serious. My job is to habe a mtach-up thread that's
as accurate as possible. If you really want the number to change you have to prove that it's 65/35 and convince the Wolf community that it's such a bad match-up.
...
Btw don't mention all the things Snake has going for him. Just how they apply to the match-up and prove that Wolf has no options to deal with these things. I have plenty of tourney experience with Snake so you don't need to say that Snake can set up KO moves very well.
I know that. Adress our points ... the one in the OP (summary) and my post as well as teh_spamerer's quote (you only said "it's ignorant" but never mentioned any reasons whatsoever)...