Mr.Lombardi34
Smash Ace
Green Goblin isn't from the civil war time period, either.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The dead speak?Green Goblin isn't from the civil war time period, either.
That's a weird plan, it would fall apart so easily if we just lynched one of the other players on that guilty list. Besides, it's not like <3 or pikachun00b7 are cleared, so why would the mafia expect us to just write them off as innocent in the first place?They killed Mr.Lombardi after Tom said he was mafia, along with the other two. I think it's likely that at least one of those guys is mafia (if not both of them), and they killed the one non-mafia to try and clear all of them, as a "see that link was wrong" thing.
Changed the direction of the discussion? First off, there was no serious discussion. I just casually posted hoping thatActually, I'm going to vote for Pikachunnoob, because his latest post, right after McCloud's, was trying to change discussion to something that matters nothing at all.
Vote: Pikachunnooob
Now I'm going to go read in depth what happened
I have made three votes on day 1: BreakWing, Lance, then Tom.Well all the discussion was about Tom and Lombardii, and neither are very useful right now. However, Pikachun was attacked for bandwagon and not backing up his votes, which coincides with my old post.
Later I realized it was too risky to vote Lance as opposed to Tom.(I truly believed that Tom was Town aligned at that time.)C'mon man!
To some degree, I believe in Tom. However, he could be a bluffing Mafia member. It is possible that he knew that we won't actually vote for him. Instead, we would put him in our townie list, permanently. And if he is Mafia, then we are screwed. It would be too risky NOT to vote for him.
However, if we do lynch him and he is townie, then we accomplished nothing. The result will just agree with our guess. If we lynch someone other than Tom, then we will get information. Although, there is a level of uncertainty of Tom's Townness if we do lynch someone else.
This is a very hard decision to make.
However, I will take a risk for now. Lance has made suspicious posts. If Tom is right about Lance's experience, then I wonder what is happening. Red is right, Lance needs explain himself.
Vote: Lance
I would like a lynch before monday. Lance's prediction is not strong enough to assume he is scum, anyway. I said on my post (the one where I voted Lance) that voting either Lance or Tom had their pros&cons. So I did not think that I had to give a reason for my vote for Tom since I already did. I just decided to take less of a risk on Day 1. Nothing wrong with that.
It's been used before, where there is a list of correct mafia and one townie, so the mafia go for the townie to clear the other. I remember it being in the first mafia we had here (I did it), then I remember it again being used somewhere else, maybe in SPMafia or Trigun.That's a weird plan, it would fall apart so easily if we just lynched one of the other players on that guilty list. Besides, it's not like <3 or pikachun00b7 are cleared, so why would the mafia expect us to just write them off as innocent in the first place?
True, that is very possible.Then again, the mafia could consist of other players and they were hoping that we would believe what you suggested so we would lynch townies.
That's also possible, but I think it's incredibly unlikely that the mafia would not use their night kill, since it's the only real way they can win. It's more likely that the/a vigilante would withhold their kill then the mafia, but maybe the mafia was doc blocked.I also think it's possible that a vigilante or SK killed Mr. Lombardi. They may have believed Tom's list, and the mafia didn't use a nightkill to keep us in a slump on Day 2.
You know, you're right. Your post was less then a minute apart from McClouds. My bad.Changed the direction of the discussion? First off, there was no serious discussion. I just casually posted hoping thatMcCainMccloud will confirm that Breakwing's inference was correct(though he posted before I was finished.) Bedsides, we will discuss Tom and Lombardi throughout Day 2 I am sure. I think if there is someone here who is distracting us, it is YOU. You brought attention to me on such small reasoning, anyway.
Vote: <3I'll express my fears here agian. Tom is mafia and this is an elaborate trap made to gain our trust and have our doctor role(s) waste their abilitie(s) on him and give the mafia free shots at other important players.
That said I have no issue voting for Tom now this way if he gets out of line later he is easier to get rid of in the future.
unvote: pikachunoob
vote: Tom
Um, noI think you thought and typed way to much. And then you came up with the decision that Tom is mafia? or did I just misunderstand you?
Ditto this. I've always been in favor of the cop waiting until it's necessary to claim. Anything else puts him at too great a risk.The mafia could lynch the doctor(s)/bodyguards(s) and that whole plan would go to waste.
It's smarter if the cop waits later on in the game 'till he finds a mafia, then try to make a case against the mafia without telling the people that he's the cop, only giving his role away when necessary.
Fool has already been confirmed. You arnt it =PI've been intentionally lurking most of the game, trying a new style of play I suppose. I would like to see something.
vote: <3
I've been intentionally lurking most of the game, trying a new style of play I suppose. I would like to see something.
vote: <3
Fixed. Also, I didn't base mt suspicions of tom's list in fact I skipped over that when I was reading cause I was so pissed. This is all original.The important thing to focus on is that some or all of the mafia must have bit on tom's roleclaim, and needed tom dead due to a powerful ability. A confirmed townie would be very dangerous if the doctor was committed to saving him. But on the other hand a confirmed town later in the game is even worse because there is less time to get rid of him, a wasted late game lynch, and less people for the doctor to save other than tom.
This develops into a WIFOM argument, from the mafias point of view, that none of us can discern an appropriate answer. Lynch tom now and he's taken down to one lynch early in game and take oppurtunities to NK him later, try and shot for the deadline and hope a doctor doesn't protect tom, or leave tom alone until later in the game.
Well, the best I found was <3's attempt to go for every angle. It doesnt pick a single mafia option, but all of them. Combined with <3 threatening sentences which says to me he's thinking mainly about ways to get rid of tom and (I know this is metagaming and can be effected by outside activities) <3's great disparity in activity between this game and hellhouse, I think there is very high likelihood that <3 is mafia.
(Also this is way out there, but his forgetting to bold entirely makes me feel like he was distracted or nervous when he made the post, his precision was shown in hellhous with a rather annoying role restriction, i dont think he'd make that mistake unless he was flustered)
Vote: <3
What do you guys think?