Bringing an argument here for the sake of keeping it out of the Impa thread:
You're arguing with a straw man.
I never said anything to the effect of non video game media never being considered in move sets.
In fact above I said that they are occasionally considered despite precedence being given to the games.
When you try arguing that C. Falcon using the gun in the comic and not in the games makes using a gun for fighting "unreasonable" (since that's how you responded to my initial point about Falcon in counter to your point about Ganon), then you're saying that non-video game media doesn't matter regardless of whether that it your intentional argument or not.
Yep.
It's not really relevant to what I was saying. Maybe he should have a gun because of it? I don't really care.
You: "Ganondorf should have a sword because that's how he 'actually' fights."
Me: "C. Falcon should have a gun because that's how he 'actually' fights."
I'd have to say that's pretty relevant to the discussion. It's a counterpoint. Ever heard of one?
"A person, thing, or situation in which inconsistent elements are present."
Key word being inconsistent.
His moveset is inconsistent with his in-game fighting.
You fail to get that his in-game fighting is
never consistent.
I mean did you even stop to think about this?
OoT: Flies in the air, shoots energy balls at you that you have to reflect back at him. Then goes into Ganon mode with two swords.
WW: Controls a puppet. Then fights you using dual wielding sword style.
TP: Possesses Zelda and shoots energy balls at you that you have to reflect back at him. Then goes into Ganon mode who charges at you like a mad beast. Then goes back into Ganondorf mode hits you with a single sword while on horseback. Then gets off his horse and fights you in a final duel with the single sword.
The
only consistency is that there are two fights where he flies in the air and shoots energy balls at you that you have to reflect. Just
having a sword in two games is not consistent, especially when you consider that the styles of fighting are completely different and that the only reason he even HAS a sword in TP was because it was used to execute him and it failed (as in, it's not
his sword
).
And then, OoT's swords don't count, as you want to exclude Ganon mode for some reason in your argument (possibly because that means Ganondorf/Ganon is most prominent with a trident, and you want to argue for him using a
sword).
And then, the fact that Ganon and Ganondorf are the same character means that being a pig monster is more consistent than anything else, seeing as the
only game with Ganon that there was no pig monster form at all was Wind Waker. But even then, there was an expy of it in Puppet Ganon. So for consistency's sake, we should have a pig Ganon with a trident instead of his humanoid state.
Sometimes I think you argue just for the sake of arguing Golden..... Another silly argument that you were under no obligation to continue where a simple dictionary lookup shows you to be wrong
(Although I can understand why you thought that was the meaning since it is the most common colloquial usage).
Sometimes I think you argue for the sake of arguing ManBear..... Another silly argument that you were under no obligation to continue where a simple analysis of what is consistent shows you to be wrong.
I'm sorry I can't understand what you're trying to say here. Could you please clarify?
The Triforce of Power grants its wielder "true power", consisting of near invulnerability, immense strength, and an unlimited source of mystical power.
His strength and magical prowess are often referred to in legend throughout the series when he is mentioned (such as Four Sword Adventures, where Ganon
dorf doesn't make a physical appearance (only the pig Ganon), yet legends speak of the Guerdo thief Ganondorf.
So punching someone in a cut scene overrules using a sword whenever you actually fight him physically?
Now look who's arguing a straw man.
I never said that it "overruled" anything. In fact, I never said that he
shouldn't use a sword. Hell, I'd absolutely love it if he uses a sword like the non-canon one from Melee or a sword like Demise's (to reference how he came to be).
All I've been saying is that Ganondorf fighting hand-to-hand with magic-infused strikes makes sense (and gave examples where he has done things without a weapon) and that he doesn't
need a sword to be stripped from the Captain Ganon stigma.
I mean, in most showdowns with Ganon/Ganondorf/Agahnim, there is typically magic involved. And his magic prowess, as said earlier, is part of what defines him
within the series. So being a wizard-esque fighter arguably best represents him as a whole.
I don't remember Ganondorf combat fighting Link in an actual boss fight in Twilight. Unless you mean amidst using his sword? In that case ofcourse giving him some Ike style hits amongst sword moves is perfectly reasonable.
As long as his moves are derived from his games I'm happy
. Continuing to omit the largest part of his fighting style is ridiculous and I don't know why you're defending it.
Except that it isn't the largest part of his fighting style. And even if you continue to plug your ears to that with the whole "But Ganondorf fought with swords in boss fights the most" thing, that's still TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT STYLES; Wind Waker's dual sword style focusing on speed, and Twilight Princess' single sword style focusing on power.
Neither is more prominent than the other; given that they have been used in the same amount of games (1).
It didn't mean it's okay to make Ike a hand to hand fighter just because he may have used his hands rarely and insignificantly and rarely in his games.
This argument is pitiful.
'Twould be less pitiful if you actually gave decent points.
(punching the ground isn't hand to hand combat)
I don't recall ever saying it was. Just that it was an example of his
strength.
I couldn't agree more that part of the reason they must've initially saw it justifiable to put Ganondorf in as a hand to hand fighter was due to his physical fighting style in humanoid form being a blank canvas due to only fighting with magic so far (this is no longer the case).
For the record even with a semi-blank canvas I don't agree with their choice to go with hand to hand. A trident or his E3 sword would have made alot more sense at this point.
It's just unfortunate that they negligently rushed him in as a clone and didn't make it priority to fix in Brawl by which stage the sword was his humanoid forms' established weapon of choice.
There is so much wrong here, I don't know where to begin.
Let's see:
a) There is no "they". It was all Sakurai.
b) Ganondorf was added as a clone of Falcon in Melee not because of a "blank canvas", but because he matched Falcon's body frame and could be squeezed in as a last minute clone like the other 5. The only reason Ganondorf was chosen for this role was because of his popularity. Had that not be the case, someone else would have been added to clone Falcon (or a different character, really) while Ganondorf would not have been in
at all.
c) Ganondorf was not a product of "rushing". He wasn't even
going to be in Melee at all until Sakurai decided to add some clones to beef up the roster a bit due to EXTRA time after finishing up all the planned characters (i.e. the non-clones).
d) Ganondorf wasn't "fixed" in Brawl because Sakurai didn't want to completely alienate those who played as him in Melee. That being said, Smash 4 can easily correct this by adding Black Shadow to take over Ganondorf's cloned moves while Ganondorf gets a new set. That way, Ganondorf can be changed without alienating those who played as him before.
e) "Established weapon of choice" only applies to Wind Waker. The only reason he has a sword in TP is because it was the sword that failed to execute him.
(Your statement about him never using a sword before Melee isn't entirely true either. He has his E3 sword in his taunt afterall.)
I said he didn't have one
in canon until after Melee. It helps to actually read what is being said.
No, swinging a sword in an animation demo did not magically make Ganondorf a swordsman in Zelda canon. (And before you try counterpointing that Falcon doesn't have a gun because he doesn't shoot one outside the comics, notice he has one in a holster on his right leg in every game he appears in.)
I also couldn't agree more that it could be something other than a sword. Like dusting off the ol' trident.
It really doesn't bother me.
What bothered me is keeping him as a combat fighter with zero moves resembling his games which you bizarrely tried to defend.
(although a sword would make the most sense since it's the only weapon he has used in humanoid form).
Zero moves, eh?
Remember when I talked about that rushing palm he used to kill one of the Sages? That was the basis of his Flame Choke.
His Forward Tilt in Brawl, commonly referred to as the "Sparta Kick"? That comes from his boss fight.
And I've read (but not actually seen yet) that if you take too long to break the sword clash in TP, he performs a move that resembles Brawl's version of Warlock Punch, which takes a chunk of health. (Wind Waker also has Ganondorf backhand Zelda in the boss fight, though it's kind of a stretch to compare that to Brawl's Warlock Punch other than both being backhanded strikes)
His elbowing Forward Smash was also used in TP, but without the dark magic Brawl gave it.
So to say
none of his moves were seen in some form in the Zelda series is false. And just so you don't accuse me of "defending him not using a sword" again, I'm only
correcting your statement about how none of his moves come from the games.
I like that bit of stretched logic about the triforce of power.
He wields the triforce of power... therefore he has strength... therefore combat fighting makes sense.
Power is not a synonym for physical strength in this case, nor does having strength mean he should be a combat fighter.
Except that it has been established that the Triforce of Power grants him
immense strength alongside unlimited mystical power and near invulnerability. Seriously. Do your research before you post.
Congratulations on picking a fight with me for no reason where you assumed many things about what I thought which were wrong... and making a number of goofy statements in the process.
And congratulations to you for saying completely ignorant things and making assumptions about my argumentation, making you look like a tool once again.
EDIT: I really hate how quoting screws up now.