I know how the sequence of betting goes lmao. You were big blind, Hanson was in first position and raised, then Shuz pushed(went all in) hansons raise.
I don't understand what's confusing about that.
It's ok level 1 thinker. I am going to show you why what you said makes no sense.
Stacks= Hanson-lol i got no moneys
Shuz-lol I super lucky and gotz all da monies
Hanson's UTG but playing 6 handed and thinks that he can outplay god cuz he's a bit on the tipsy side. Which means that his opening range probably looks like this...
(22+, JT+, A6+) all pairs, broadways and Ace rags to AK.
Shuz (having seen hanson play his hands recently) has a good enough read on him that his range is really wide UTG or anywhere. He looks down at TxTx and realizes that he doesn't wanna get blown off his hand by anybody else to his left. By him calling here, he allows players with double gapped suited connectors and pocket pairs to call profitably and see a flop. On top of that, if he smooth calls, he has to worry about seeing a safe flop in which his opponent can choose to shove on with say AhJh on a 5h 7h 2c board and that leaves Shuz with a tough decision.
On another note, I would find it hard to believe that Shuz can make any more value off of hands that he is beating postflop on safe boards. If Hanson is going to call off anymore bets in a 30:70~ situation, it's not going to be against Shuz or on a scary board.
I'm positive that Shuz realized the probability of Hanson calling his money bad postflop did not outweigh the percentage chance that he calls a shove for stacks preflop with a weaker holding. Thus making this play a very smart one. The chances Hanson calls pre with the weak hand range that I gave outweighs the value Shuz would get from bets postflop.
For shuz's sake I went ahead and stoved his hand vs Hanson's most likely range.
Board: 4d Kh 2d
Equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 61.296% 61.10% 00.20% 146380 472.50 { TcTd }
Hand 1: 38.704% 38.51% 00.20% 92255 472.50 { 22+, A6s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, A6o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
The reason why I think your comments make no sense is because you are trying to tell Shuz how to play his hand. Instead of asking why he did that, you give us a general explanation of how YOU would play the hand. Shuz has position on Hanson postflop but cannot protect his hand without a raise. So Shuz raised, the amount is directly correlated with the hand range he puts Hanson on and the % chance that Hanson calls him with a weaker hand...which IMO is HIGH!
edit: he just got unlucky.