brdy_
Smash Lord
Ike? 2h308r
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Let's talk about how great Ness and Lucas are in Brawl. O wait, they AREN'T IN IT! Ninten is the star of Mother 1, not Mother 2. Ninten's predecessor, however, is NOT in all 3 smash games. O, and Lucas is the brother of someone who was suppose to be in Brawl, but is in Melee! HAHAHA! TAKE THAT WORD FILTER! I win teh internetz!That word filter was pissing me off for a second there
Nice joke
Probably. I don't think there were combos at E4ALL, maybe Gimpy could clear that up for us...Welcome to noobified smash Gimpy. The devs probably got 4 stocked repeatedly by good players in melee so they finally had p*ssy fit and destroyed the competitive scene.
Did you think they were honestly just giving you guys a test play at E for all? Nope, They wanted you to find Advanced techniques so they could remove them. But thats just my opinion.
There was(off the top of my head) Dash Dancing, JC'd Grabs, JC'd Smashes, More Hit stun, and footstool jumping was much more difficult to do(the new easy footstool screws up my edge guards alot >.<)Probably. I don't think there were combos at E4ALL, maybe Gimpy could clear that up for us...
im sorry but if i may...Yeah... that was a home run. My post was on such a higher level than you, that I don't even think you knew you were playing baseball.
The point in that post was to show that characters in melee looked like they were DOING something compared to current Brawl videos. It seems though, that you were so hell bent on going on a melee tantrum, which, by the way, was not pretty, that you missed the entire intention of everything. You know what was wrong with melee? You say it was unbalanced. Well ****, who was the best player in the world. You are a noob, so I bet you know only a handful of pros anyway, especially ken. Who did he play as? ****ING MARTH!!! OMG Fox is sooo broken! And what is this bull about him being the easiest to play with? He most certainly is not. The right is reserved to Shiek. Any new player can grab shiek, move in the direction of the enemy and hit the C-stick towards them to win. Wow, that fox with his timing, spacing, and such is just to easy to grasp.
But yeah, they totally got rid of THAT cheapness. Now we have chaingrabs off the stage with many characters, instant gimps with certain characters, and tons of wall infinites or near infinites. Yeah, this game is way better. Someone who plays Yoshi, DK, Sonic, amd other low characters completely stand a chance against all that bull.
So, Boo-hoo, attention *****.
way to sound like an idiotGoddammit Gimpy, is your newfound lust for attention really worth more of this insipid Melee vs. Brawl prattle? What happened to setting an example?
I am absolutely dying at that picture. Best post ever.This is what Brawl's cover should have been, to at least give us a little warning before buying it.
Now it is who can camp the best. I wonder who is going to be the Ken of camping?Brawl is still competitive. It's just a different game that most of the pro 64/melee players dislike. It's still competitive. Just in a different light. Not much they can do about it except try to make a petition and get companies like MLG to continue hosting Melee games.
There's more to it than simply camping. I consider it more turtling than anything else which to some might mean the same thing. You can't win if both parties simply sit there doing nothing. The problem is that the game is a defensive one. I've went through this more in previous posts so I'm not going to do that but there is a time when both parties must approach. There's also ways to close the gap but it is a risky venture. Call it camping or not but there's still a lot of skill involved. There's also a lot of thinking that needs to be done as well.Now it is who can camp the best. I wonder who is going to be the Ken of camping?
Yes camping requires skill, but who really wants to be known as the best camper?
If you enjoy a game with a low tech ceiling, a lot of prediction and turtling as the main strategy then I'm not going to stop ya. I don't find a game where you have to force the other player to approach in order to be in an advantageous position entertaining.There's more to it than simply camping. I consider it more turtling than anything else which to some might mean the same thing. You can't win if both parties simply sit there doing nothing. The problem is that the game is a defensive one. I've went through this more in previous posts so I'm not going to do that but there is a time when both parties must approach. There's also ways to close the gap but it is a risky venture. Call it camping or not but there's still a lot of skill involved. There's also a lot of thinking that needs to be done as well.
You might find it boring but there's some people that actually enjoy Brawl's gameplay. Like myself but I also enjoy Melee's gameplay as well. You can be considered the best camper but if someone manages to force someone that's camping to move and can consistantly out think them then that would make them the best at approaching. Regardless I believe that there will be a competitive scene for Brawl unlike what most people on here think. You might find it boring but I don't. There's plenty to keep me interested and others as well.
I think it will prosper for the simple fact that it's Smash. Plus the game has been out for a very short time. I'm not claiming that techs might be discovered that'll automaticly make it similar to a traditional fighter but people might find new safe ways to approach. There's a chance that they won't but it's still a possibility. Plus I do enjoy how it is now but if I even get slightly bored I can pop melee in at anytime as well. It's not like Melee has ceased to exist. The competitive scene might even though I don't think that it should but I can still enjoy the game. I enjoy Brawl greatly for what it is. I respect everyone's opinion and I hope that Melee tournaments still go on for you guys.If you enjoy a game with a low tech ceiling, a lot of prediction and turtling as the main strategy then I'm not going to stop ya. I don't find a game where you have to force the other player to approach in order to be in an advantageous position entertaining.
I'm not going to say there no skill in it, but those types of games never seem to create a prosperous competitive scene.
(Since it seems no matter what people say, people are sure they have Brawl all figured out--maybe you might listen to Azen?)
I like how everyone in the Top 10 except me and Chillin hate Brawl. They all got so depressed when they went to brawl tournies hoping to win money easily then getting ***** instead. The only reason they want to go back to Melee is so they can win cash again. I wonder why they got ***** in Brawl, maybe its cause Brawl is way more competitive than Melee was. They were too cocky to realize that their Top positions might be in danger, and now they make excuses saying Brawl is too easy and anyone can win. No Jones losers. Maybe they should actually start practicing instead of wishing their Melee skill carried over to Brawl. Brawl is already super competitive, it won't be easy for anyone to get to the Top, so many people are trying to get good now; you can't be cocky just cause you were pro in Melee. Its a new game, not Melee 2.0. Eventually most of the anti-brawlers will die off like with the 64 crowd. lol, just look at how depressed Isai was when he couldn't win everything anymore in Melee like in 64, and he just eventually gave up and stopped trying. Yall losers can stay in the past with Melee and 64, but right now is the time of Brawl and a new generation of smashers will take your place.
-Azen
I think that it was always a valid argument (when explained properly), but most people just don't want to hear it. That's just IMO though, feel free to chew me out for it.Just because he says melee 2.0 doesn't make it any more of a valid argument.
We don't know that for sure. For all we know, the Melee players could be johnning the entire time, just like there is also the chance that they could be right. The fact of the matter is, no one would ever have the balls to just admit that they hate Brawl 'cause they lose at it (if indeed that is the case), and because of this (and the very nature of human decency itself), we have to take that possibility into consideration.I mean, Azen has to be right, he is soo 1337!
Just because he says melee 2.0 doesn't make it any more of a valid argument.
There are some arguments for his claims and his observations of other pro gamers are likely true.
However, the Brawl critics are far from being pissed off because they can't win any more and can't adapt.
good point, but outside of math there really isn't much absolute truth.We don't know that for sure. For all we know, the Melee players could be johnning the entire time, just like there is also the chance that they could be right. The fact of the matter is, no one would ever have the balls to just admit that they hate Brawl 'cause they lose at it (if indeed that is the case), and because of this (and the very nature of human decency itself), we have to take that possibility into consideration.
Hell, I used to john a lot in Melee. Then, I got used to it and sucked it up; now, I play Melee better than I ever have before.
Ooh! Louis, before you out to kill anybody, let me know! I have a broadsword I've been meaning to test out. *devilish grin*Also, I will kill anyone that tries to go into the argument of absolute truth. I don't mean I will kill you in the debate, but I will find your address and kill you! Or well not really... or maybe, just keep it in mind. I guess the point is, this is not a philosophy class.
edit:
SAME GOES FOR IMAGINARY NUMBERS
It doesn't to me, since many of the people staying with Melee aren't the ones making big money, and they probably have better chances in Brawl because that game is so new.Heh. I love that Azen statement. I can't say whether he's right about Brawl's competitiveness (I know a lot of people will argue against him about that), but Melee players staying in an environment where they can make money sounds very believable.
Not if they're really always losing. I know that some of the big Brawl tournaments so far have had the same top 4 spots (can't name off the top of my head, but they've been cited here before), but if newer players are really giving Melee vets such a run for their money, I can see Azen's statement holding water. The thing is, I'm sure many Melee players are simply going to the Brawl tournaments for now because they are new. Why wouldn't they? If Azen's statement is true, once they lose enough times to numerically 'justify' their actions, they'll run back to Melee, citing 'depth' and 'skill' all the way.It doesn't to me, since many of the people staying with Melee aren't the ones making big money, and they probably have better chances in Brawl because that game is so new.
I don't understand this statement at all. The people at my school play guilty Gear a lot. They got Accent Core (or w/e) a while back. The same person who was winning before was winning still, right off the bat. Then, on top of that, he is still winning now. Same goes for the people playing Halo 2 and then playing Halo 3. All sequels play similarly. People who play the prequel generally know that they are going to at least somewhat understand the next game. Brawl... not so much. the community is flipped upside down because new people with no talent can beat people with amazing skill, even if it was from another game.I like the Azen statement.You can't really expect to be good at a new game just because you were good at the prequel.On the topic Gimpy started,I believe the progression won't be as rapid as Melee.I think that it'll be like the N64 opposed to Melee.It'll eventualy die off.I just think that the people who are Anti-Brawl just aren't used to playing without the advanced techs of Melee
It's questionable statements that require my subjective, negative to an extent, replies.Brawl matches in general are more exciting to watch than Melee matches, in which you see a good Fox player land a SHffLed Nair against the other character and you know it's going to be all over within a few seconds.
A good Brawl battle on the other hand...you can actually see the thoughts and strategies behind the characters. When Dedede takes a chance and does his Fsmash facing the other direction and the opponent predicts wrong and rolls behind him before getting owned by it. Now that's awesome.