Why do people complain about Project M Recoveries being "Too Good"? This is a great thing to have, as it can extend a match/the gameplay of a fight and you guys like extra skill/tech in matches right? Well think of this as an opportunity to rack up extra hits on your enemies/opponents to try to launch them to the point where a recovery is impossible, which is pretty badass to do compared to your opponent falling downward to their doom.
-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Why?
- Thread starter Booster
- Start date
- Status
im just peachy
Smash Ace
idk i guess people don't like change ? i don't play project m,
but I'm sure they wanted a game that's really close
to melee's style, and improved recoveries isn't "melee''
but I'm sure they wanted a game that's really close
to melee's style, and improved recoveries isn't "melee''
Send me a Private Message explaining to me or post it on the thread, I'm interested
steelguttey
mei is bei
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2014
- Messages
- 1,674
cause the whole game isnt onstage lol. fighting games are about changes in momentum and capitilizing on things and recoveries that are ridiculous dont let you do either lol
Master WGS
Smash Lord
I want my punishes to matter, but if they can recover from anywhere, that stops being the case.
0RLY
A great conversation filler at bars and parties
It does add extra tech skill to edgeguards, though.
Master WGS
Smash Lord
Sadly, campy edgeguards are neither fun to do/deal with/watch. Ballsy ones can be, but when they're required for EVERY kill, it stops being flashy and cool.
Because they play as melee top tiers and get salty that other characters have good recovery.
or
They're bad at edge guarding.
any other 'reason' can boil down to these.
or
They're bad at edge guarding.
any other 'reason' can boil down to these.
^ So there's no such thing as too good for you? You would be bad at designing things.
Also there is a difference between complaining about recoveries because you lose to them and complaining because you think it's bad game design.
If you watch high level project m tournaments many times players don't even bother edge guarding and opt to keep control of center stage. If the people who made the game think it's a problem, it's a problem.
Also there is a difference between complaining about recoveries because you lose to them and complaining because you think it's bad game design.
If you watch high level project m tournaments many times players don't even bother edge guarding and opt to keep control of center stage. If the people who made the game think it's a problem, it's a problem.
Daftatt
"float like a puffball, sting like a knee"
Why don't you just read the reasons the PMBR publicly stated. I thought it was pretty clear.
InfinityCollision
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,245
Ability to recover from a significant distance away and ability to recover with low risk are two different things.
Last edited:
Master WGS
Smash Lord
Right, but that doesn't mean they aren't both problematic if a majority of the cast can do it.
Twin Rhapsody
Smash Apprentice
I just hope the recoveries don't get completely destroyed. I've generally agreed with most of the PMBR on their engine/character decisions, but this one actually frightens me that it will just sour what I've enjoyed playing and following for the past couple years.
standardtoaster
Tubacabra
There's already a thread for discussing the blog post. http://smashboards.com/threads/pmbr-says-they-are-redesigning-recoveries.363255/
- Status