Rhinomaster22
Smash Cadet
S tier:
A + tier:
A tier:
A - tier:
B tier: ()
C + tier:
C tier:
C - tier:
D tier:
E tier:
F tier:
G tier:
A + tier:
A tier:
A - tier:
B tier: ()
C + tier:
C tier:
C - tier:
D tier:
E tier:
F tier:
G tier:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
S:
A+
A:
B+
B: ( )
C+:
C:
D+:
D:
E+:
E:
From the OP.THE ORDER OF THE CHARACTERS CAN NOT BE CHANGED.
Oh, well, what should I change?From the OP.
Click "Edit" on your post, and start from scratch. That would be a good start.Oh, well, what should I change?
Oh ok, I had no clue, thanks!Click "Edit" on your post, and start from scratch. That would be a good start.
Use this: ()
And go along and split characters into tiers. For example, I might thing that there is a tier gap between Mario and Sonic, so I would press Enter on my keyboard to make a tier gap. Then, I might think the next gap should be between Bayonetta and Mewtwo, so another Enter there etc. Only make gaps. Don't change the order of the characters around, which you did for example in your first post. Even if you think Roy might be 4 places higher for example, you can't move him about. Your task is to just add tier gaps
I agree, Mewtwo is gunning for that #10 spot.Hopefully Bayo can move in the wildcard round; the top row is a pretty solid estimation of top tier/top 10 without her.
You're not supposed to change the order of any characters in the tiers at this point in time.Top:
High:
High-Mid:
Mid:
Low-Mid:
Low:
Bottom:
Trash:
You, I like this. 10/10- Top tier/Top 5 tier. All very strong top 5 contenders. Chance that one of the characters in the next tier could switch spots with one of these characters.
- High Tier. All of these characters have a slight edge above the characters below them, something very minor holding them back.
- Mid/low High Tier. Gatekeeper tier. What separates the good characters from the great characters. These characters all have potential to be in the next tier, but have either a lack of results, or lack of representation.
()- High-Mid Tier. Characters that work has been put into, not quite on the next level (yet?). Holding them back: major lack of representation, bad MU spread, flawed design, etc.
- Low-Mid Tier. Largely unexplored and need attention. Have potential, but have yet to show what they're capable of.
- Low Tier. Fundamentally stunted. Characters that have some major flaw (i.e. bad recovery, bad frame data, poor design, poor hitboxes) keeping them from ever becoming great.
- Bottom 5 tier.
I understand that things are bound to change in the next phase of voting but I just wanted to explain why I chose the spots I did. There's a few characters who I think should be in the next/previous tier but there's no reordering for now. Overall though, I feel like this is pretty accurate as to how it should be organized as most characters fit into their respective tiers IMO.
did you even read the rules :/Top:
High:
High-Mid: (),
Middle:
Low-Mid:
Low Tier:
Bottom Tier:
Vote exactly where you want those 3 to be, not just + or -.1:
2:
3:
4:()
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
-lol
-Once again, lol. You guys are eventhubishly overhyping Marth, and it's litertatly to a meme level by this point. Just because Marth got buffed and actually EXISTS in the metagame now doesn't mean he's high tier lol.
+People are really ignoring his strengths right now, and underrating his matchup spread. Pac-Man has a lot of potential.
I also think +is just as important as those other three, but we only get three votes and he's the only one that people will actually vote for so.....
We're allowed to do that? Nice.Vote exactly where you want those 3 to be, not just + or -.
I honestly don't know what planet you are living on if your basis for Marth's placement is "eventhubishly" overhyped. Just as a point of reference to start, I don't think Marth really needs to be any higher right now. However, Marth is most certainly not overhyped. Marth's buffs made a difference, and you are correct that the buffs alone don't make him a high tier. However, Marth's results and consistency after these buffs show us that he is certainly fine where he is. You cannot ignore how well Marth has been doing after these buffs. Of note, after buffs, he has been getting multiple local GF placements with Pugwest and Mr E, and even False at locals, with things like Mansion Takover and S4@GU, he got 5th at KTAR XVII, 5th at ... (I can't remember the name, a japanese tournament, of note, there was a Bowser in top 5 too, somebody tell me please the name. I'll also mention is in Japan, where Marth has historically been frowned upon), and of more note, there were two Marth's in top 17 at Pound 2016, and four different players in the top 17 at GOML used Marth at some point, two of them (False and Mr E) used him almost exclusively and placed in the top 17, as opposed to using him on a couple of occasions, but even the players considering using Marth shows something about him.-3Once again, lol. You guys are eventhubishly overhyping Marth, and it's litertatly to a meme level by this point. Just because Marth got buffed and actually EXISTS in the metagame now doesn't mean he's high tier lol.
His spot IS high tier so you're argument of him not being high tier but deserving his spot is wrong.I'll be putting my votes on later, but for now, I just want to draw attention to this.
I honestly don't know what planet you are living on if your basis for Marth's placement is "eventhubishly" overhyped. Just as a point of reference to start, I don't think Marth really needs to be any higher right now. However, Marth is most certainly not overhyped. Marth's buffs made a difference, and you are correct that the buffs alone don't make him a high tier. However, Marth's results and consistency after these buffs show us that he is certainly fine where he is. You cannot ignore how well Marth has been doing after these buffs. Of note, after buffs, he has been getting multiple local GF placements with Pugwest and Mr E, and even False at locals, with things like Mansion Takover and S4@GU, he got 5th at KTAR XVII, 5th at ... (I can't remember the name, a japanese tournament, of note, there was a Bowser in top 5 too, somebody tell me please the name. I'll also mention is in Japan, where Marth has historically been frowned upon), and of more note, there were two Marth's in top 17 at Pound 2016, and four different players in the top 17 at GOML used Marth at some point, two of them (False and Mr E) used him almost exclusively and placed in the top 17, as opposed to using him on a couple of occasions, but even the players considering using Marth shows something about him.
Something also of note, is Mr E beating Nairo in the GF of a recent local tournament. Not only did he beat Nairo's Doc and Robin to reset the bracket (Mr E came from losers bracket), he then proceeded to beat Nairo's ZSS 2-0. Not only a huge monument for Marth beating a ZSS, this isn't just any ZSS. This is THE ZSS, one of the best player in the world. This, once again, shows Marth has the tools to compete.
Here is said match:
Once again, I will reiterate this point; I don't yet believe Marth deserves to be much higher, if at all. If anything, he could POTENTIALLY be 1 or 2 spaces higher, but that's beside the point. What isn't debatable is his current placement, as Marth has consistently shown he DESERVES to be placed where he is. The writing is on the wall now. You can't just ignore everything he has done so far.
Sorry, I didn't realise Tier 5 out of 9, placement 31 out of 58 was high tier... Marth isn't even in high tier for a start; he's in the mid tier.His spot IS high tier so you're argument of him not being high tier but deserving his spot is wrong.
As for results, I agree he has good results, but Duck Hunt and WFT also get those levels of results (Duck Hunt's are mostly in japan) and they aren't up there. I mean, Duck Hunt's theory is worse but WFT's theory is like, a tiny bit worse.
Nairo is inconsistant a lot, espicially in his own region. He's been beaten by a Robin before too, and Robin's litertatly in the spot right below Marth imo. Plus a ton of other upsets.
False used Sheik a little more than Marth at GOML iirc so..... yea. You keep saying than False mains Marth, but he's either a secondary or duo main along with Sheik and Ryu (It's hars to tell at this point) outside of small tournaments where he'll go mostly Marth.
Oh, he's at 31st? I thought he was 29th, my mistake then.Sorry, I didn't realise Tier 5 out of 9, placement 31 out of 58 was high tier... Marth isn't even in high tier for a start; he's in the mid tier.
This is for another argument, but Duck Hunt and Wii Fit Trainer have a lot more core problems than Marth, so while they get results, they rarely get in the top placements at major tournaments because of said problems that hold them back. Heck, even Shulk got 13th at GOML, so while Shulk has arguably less results than Duck Hunt, he actually deserves to be higher because he gets more relevant results.
Once again, you're missing my point. False uses Marth and Sheik, so while he does use Sheik usually more than Marth, he does indeed use Marth, not just for counterpick matchups or such (such as like Leo did).
And you can't just discredit such a feat as a Marth beating Nairo as "he's inconsistent". Regardless of consistency, Nairo is officially, the 2nd highest ranked player in Smash 4. That is fact (http://smashboards.com/rankings/smash-for-wii-u.8/league). A Marth managing to beat him is a huge point of record for Marth.