Rigor Mortis
Smash Journeyman
This thread is now about ads lol
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
A 3 stock match usually lasts like 5-7 minutes at least. A 5 stock match would last 3 years in Brawl, I'd imagine.Has anyone considered how short a brawl match can be? 5 stock with two pros takes around 5 minutes at the most, I doubt that 3 stock will be any longer >_>. At least with halo, you can have 50 kills and at least a 5 minute match with some nice strategy going around.
I still don't see why mlg is using their money to advertise on swf when they didn't even include brawl in their circut ?_?...
I actually had ads until I switched to Classic Blue. I don't know if it's just coincidence or ads aren't configured for this style...You get ads? I'm using Internet Explorer, and even I have no ads.
Yes. And 1.5 years of that would just be waiting for people to land.A 3 stock match usually lasts like 5-7 minutes at least. A 5 stock match would last 3 years in Brawl, I'd imagine.
I guess I was playing a 5 stock match while watching a 3 stock match, not the other way around >.<. Anyway, I guess MLG didn't want to see combos, KOs and, well, anything related to brawl ._., go figure.A 3 stock match usually lasts like 5-7 minutes at least. A 5 stock match would last 3 years in Brawl, I'd imagine.
i belive melee had the 2nd biggest tournament circuit (next to halo 2)Also Halo has a larger fanbase. and Brawl is boring as hell to watch. I honestly wonder if Melee would still be in the MLG circuit if Brawl was never released. Same with EVO. Because other then Brawl being boring to watch doesn't smash have one of the best competitive scene's out there?
I like a majority of your post, but come the hell on at this. I've watched all the best pros play this game, and it puts me to sleep. It is nowhere near Melee status ever, don't kid yourself.I'm pretty much done here, but for those of you that think Brawl isn't fast or fun to watch, rofl. You're watching the wrong people. When I fight R00kie, it's fast and fun. Melee status? Not really, sometimes though. It's still pretty hot though.
He never said it was near Melee status. He said there are still people who are entertaining to watch. And he's right. There aren't many entertaining playstyles in Brawl, but there are some that are not only fun to watch, but good. Ninjalink's Diddy, Ally's Snake and MyRoboticClaw's ZSS among them.I like a majority of your post, but come the hell on at this. I've watched all the best pros play this game, and it puts me to sleep. It is nowhere near Melee status ever, don't kid yourself.
Best post on Smashboards this year, PERIOD.No, MLG owns Smashboards
Also, lemme just add my .02 right quick.
I used to play competative Melee, but after the MLG days. I'm very good at competative Brawl, which does have depth, just less than Melee. I personally think Melee is a better game, but I'm better at and enjoy Brawl more. Every time I talk about Brawl, I don't emphasis it's popularity over melee. Every time I talk about Melee, I don't feel compelled to compare it to Brawl. As a lover of both games, I would appreciate it if the communities didn't bash each other. After all, you're both still part of the grander smash community. Chances are, if Smash 4 comes out, and it's any good, you'll all be playing together again anyway. Brawl is a fine game, please let me play it without me having to read communal insults about it everywhere I go.
Secondly, I don't play competative shooters. I'm actually not really a big fan of shooters, as I grew up in NYC (not the nicest parts) and I know quite a few people that have been shot and killed. I don't really enjoy the concept of shooting games, though I don't bash people who have never seen a gun in person aside from perhaps on a police officer's side in it's holster. That being said, can we please stop bashing people that play the games they enjoy? It's very hypocritical, especially of Brawl players, to bash Halo and other shooters, when you dislike getting bashed by Melee players, and other fighting communities.
tl;dr: sorry for being such a softie, but seriously, why can't we all just get along?
Now, for the real point of this message. The fact is, we can speculate and curse Sakurai and MLG all day, but none of you know for sure the real reason why Brawl isn't on the circuit. Furthermore, all the bashing in this thread is very counter productive. Going on MLG's main site and putting your voice out, boycotting MLG products, mailing MLG representatives IRL, continuing to survive as a popular competative community, going out and drawing in new players: these are the things that will get us on a sponsered circuit. Flaming this thread is burning the little chance we have left.
For those that don't care, that's fine. There are those of us that do care. Please don't be cruel, rude, and vindictive just because your game is no longer played competatively on a wide-scale level. People that play Brawl aren't stopping people from playing Melee, and MOST of us don't bash you. Some of us (like myself) accept Melee as a superior game that we just suck at, and don't have the time, interest, or community to put effort into. Please, hold your comments to yourself.
If you really care, do something SMART about it.
Also, I honestly think the Brawl community is large enough to start it's own competative circuit if we play our cards right. There are thousands of us, and we all are growing people, many of us young adults, and many of us with connections. There are a couple of key actions we could take to start our own circuit.
A) Reach out to other fighting game communities. Sure, maybe the Soul Caliber community doesn't like us now, but I'd bet my bottom dollar there are a few people that would lend an ear to anyone talking about hosting sponsored SC tournaments. Having well organized mass events doesn't always require a company like EVO or MLG if we have the right people working together, and enough VOLUNTEERS to get started. Talking to under represented fighting game and shooting game (and puzzle game) communities and uniting our efforts MAKES US BIG enough to do our own thing. I will be starting a social group after this post to get anyone interested in helping me make this happen organized. It obviously won't kick off right away; I'm only 17 and still in high school. I turn 18 in March though, and I'll be on vacation in the summer, and I'm willing to take matters into my own hands and make the next step. I can't do it alone though. I'm ready, are you?
B) Unite the darned smash community together again! I mean, seriously people, we will destroy each other at the rate we are burning each other with flames. If we were to organize each other, seriously consider one another, and respect each other, and the others' preference of game, perhaps many people would find themselves enjoying both games, and both games could flourish SIMULTANEOUSLY. It only can't happen IF YOU SAY it can't happen. Nothing is actually stopping it from happening but you.
C) Organize our leaders to actually REPRESENT THE COMMUNITY. No offense to anyone in the SBR, but basically, my entire experience in the smash community has been, "The SBR is there, it's always been there, it's taken hold of power, and it's getting passed down in a monarchical manor." I very much like the concept of the SBR, but as it stands now, the group is almost clashing with the population like an expired monarch. I respect many members in the SBR, but it's time to face the facts. SBR was created in Melee days, and early Melee days at that. Even thought the purge occurred, it was orchestrated by MLG, who is apparently not even supporting us anymore. There are still many disputes about questionable members in the SBR, and some of the policies they produce.
D) Play Wifi.
Just kidding.
The real D) We NEED a UNIFORMED ruleset to help the uniformity of the community grow. If I'm playing with only "legit stages" on, and there are regions playing with Port Town, Norfair, and Jungle Japes, though we might be playing the same game, we're having totally different competitions. I think the best and simplest way to compromise is granting more personal bans. Turn on most of the stages in conflict (Pictochat, Japes, PS2, and Norfair), and grant both players more bans. This merely results in players simply fighting on stages they both seem to agree on, similar to the stage striking system we've adapted (allow both players to alternate striking neutrals until there is one left, and play on it for R1). Either this, or we can eliminate all of the disputed stages. Seriously, I don't understand why anyone would have a significant problem with Norfair off. Some people think Norfair can provide a more random and uncontrollable game changing element. This is a stronger argument than people who simply think "You're wrong". The consequences of them being right are much more significant than the consequence of them being wrong. If the stage is off and they're right, we don't get owned by a stage. If the stage is off and they're wrong, we merely lose one viable stage, and still have other options to choose from. You can still play on that stage with your friends, and even in money matches with people that agree with you. For the sake of fairness, it's safer just to turn conflict stages off.
I'm pretty much done here, but for those of you that think Brawl isn't fast or fun to watch, rofl. You're watching the wrong people. When I fight R00kie, it's fast and fun. Melee status? Not really, sometimes though. It's still pretty hot though.
Anyway, just dropping my two coppers on the table. Hit me up in my new open social group called 'Competative Circuit Organization' (CCO for short), if you're interested/want to talk to me more.
He never said it was near Melee status. He said there are still people who are entertaining to watch. And he's right. There aren't many entertaining playstyles in Brawl, but there are some that are not only fun to watch, but good. Ninjalink's Diddy, Ally's Snake and MyRoboticClaw's ZSS among them.
There you go.I'm pretty much done here, but for those of you that think Brawl isn't fast or fun to watch, rofl. You're watching the wrong people. When I fight R00kie, it's fast and fun. Melee status? Not really, sometimes though. It's still pretty hot though.
Yes, just yes. Read it guys read and remember it.Stuff
just trying to convert religionWhy do all the melee phags post in the brawl boards?
Shut up, brawl is never boring, unless both players suck. I think halo is boring. So much runningAlso Halo has a larger fanbase. and Brawl is boring as hell to watch. I honestly wonder if Melee would still be in the MLG circuit if Brawl was never released. Same with EVO. Because other then Brawl being boring to watch doesn't smash have one of the best competitive scene's out there?
Then why exactly was it not on the circuit???People never cease to amaze me. Everything for some reason has to boil down to Brawl vs Melee.
Do you guys not realize MLG has seen the exact situation that the Smash community is now with the transitions from Halo 1 to Halo 2 and again to Halo 3? The old hierarchy whining about the new game-it isn't anything new. Eventually though those voices simply fall on deaf ears.
Brawl not being added had nothing to do with the community/Brawl vs Melee/many of the things said in this thread.
That made me lol but it's pretty ful of truth.When you come on the forums, are the posts of Ninjalink or Hylian the ones that make you shake your head? Or are they the posts of random users, people who've been to one or two tourneys and spend twice as much time on the forums as they do playing the game? People who, when Brawl is all said and done, won't have mattered?
Because that's totally mature.Great idea, ill get on it now xD
Before all the rant, this was the major question I was focusing on. I mean i don't run MLG, i don't know what complications they had. However, to purchase Smashbaords, the largest community for the game, and not run it? A little awkward im afraid. But who knows? They proabably have something else in the works...Why would MLG purchase Smashboards but not have Smash on their circuit? Consider simply that Smashboards is now part of the "MLG network", which expands MLG's userbase/number of viewers and therefor online ad revenue (major emerging source for income). MLG recognizes that Smash has a devoted, popular following. They want to be the leader in competitive gaming, so it makes sense to add one of the largest competitive gaming communities to part of their network of representation.
They are willing to get add rev from it but not host originzed tourneys?? It makes no sense!MLG is a business. Adding a game isn't as simple as: "hey, we want this game, lets add it!"
There are legal ramifications, sponsors, conflicting interests, logistics of running the event/game, etc. to consider.
Smash meets (and exceeds) most (probably all) of the standards MLG uses for choosing a game. In particular Smash is one of the most popular tournament titles in the country, probably surpassed only by Halo (or possibly Madden).
Why would MLG purchase Smashboards but not have Smash on their circuit? Consider simply that Smashboards is now part of the "MLG network", which expands MLG's userbase/number of viewers and therefor online ad revenue (major emerging source for income). MLG recognizes that Smash has a devoted, popular following. They want to be the leader in competitive gaming, so it makes sense to add one of the largest competitive gaming communities to part of their network of representation.