KingofPhantoms
The Spook Factor
Bomberman or Simon Belmont would be fine by me if Snake is cut, though I'd rather keep Snake.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
So, me against Simon and Mega-manicus?I wanna see Simon Belmont so we can complete the Captain N trio (Mega Man, Pit, & Simon)
This is the second reason why I support Simon Belmont.I wanna see Simon Belmont so we can complete the Captain N trio (Mega Man, Pit, & Simon)
I blame Wii Fit Trainer's ass... now we have to deal with crappy character suggestions this weekend.I really wonder why Sakurai held off on showing anyone on Friday.
I mean its still possible for Monday, but with as many potential characters as Pokemon could likely receive for Smash 4, there was no better time than now to reveal a Pokemon character.
Sureicus! How about OoD X Chrom X Toadicus?Can we change the topic to something other than King K. Rool is too big and Arcadenick's bias *****ing.
I'll give you Snake, but Why Lucas and ROB?
...How=??? Unlocking things in Smash is super easy. I had every stage and character unlocked in Brawl by the end of Day 2. In Melee, I had every character unlocked in 4 days. In Smash 64, I had every character unlocked in a week.It increases the longevity of the game and keeps it fresh.
How the heck does that relate to games like King of Fighter=???The way the industry is going is "pay to play". Micro transactions for new features and whatnot. Unlocking things through playing gives a sense of reward and a want to continue to play to see if you can get anything.
...what the hell does this even mean=???If they remove the unlocking characters feature, the game loses its entire casual fanbase, because thats a large part of why they play.
GoddammiticusSureicus! How about OoD X Chrom X Toadicus?
2 Mother characters just seems like it's far too much.
Enough of this "x franchise characters" bulls***. That's not a part of the roster selection, so stop it.2 Mother characters just seems like it's far too much. 1 Mother character, absolutely, they're extremely unique,
Mario and Captain Falcon are more alike than Ness and Lucas.but two.. just seems far too similar. .
Mind games. It appears Jigglypuff might be revealed on Monday, judging by how the Wii Fit Trainer is sleeping.I really wonder why Sakurai held off on showing anyone on Friday.
I mean its still possible for Monday, but with as many potential characters as Pokemon could likely receive for Smash 4, there was no better time than now to reveal a Pokemon character.
Yes and yes.I'm wondering, are there any support threads for either Simon or Bomberman?
Right, Sakurai clearly cares about having similar characters. This is implying Ness & Lucas are even that similar., but two.. just seems far too
The fun part of the game is actually beating it. You know, completing objectives, unlocking characters, bringing in new content. People play smash cuz its fun, ya, but why is it fun? Because theres a sense of reward for playing. Theres a reason to continue. There was a reason why I completed adventure with every character before I quit. That "what if I missed something?" Feeling is why I completed everything, and had a blast doing it....How=??? Unlocking things in Smash is super easy. I had every stage and character unlocked in Brawl by the end of Day 2. In Melee, I had every character unlocked in 4 days. In Smash 64, I had every character unlocked in a week.
Having hidden characters literally added nothing but a dull process of jumping through loops for it. Games should be fun, not chores.
How the heck does that relate to games like King of Fighter=???
DLC could just as easily be in Smash Bros. as in other games. Also, not all DLC is bad. Look at the forthcoming Ultra Street Fighter IV. Now that's some awesome additions.
...what the hell does this even mean=???
Who the hell plays smash to unlock stuff=???
People play Smash because it's fun to play. It's as simple as that.
It doesn't feel right to you. That's what you think, to you. You said it yourself. And I'm going to need more than just that to be convinced R.O.B. is a likely cut.R.OB. something just doesn't feel right about him, to me. Going back a hundred pages can see my posts regarding R.O.B., but he just seems like out of all the characters that would be cut (I feel like we can expect some cuts,) he's one of the top contenders. Having R.O.B. feels kinda like having Diskun. It just doesn't feel right. Though, of course, R.O.B. is actually capable of doing stuff, unlike some floppy disk.
I'd rather it just go away, sans the single-player, or at least be an option.
It's gone from Street Fighter, gone from Tekken, gone from Soul Calibur, gone from King of Fighter... why can't it go away for Smash=???
Going back to 64 and Melee, "Challenger approaching" (without knowing how to get them, not looking up the caqst online, and not being the most capable Smasher, being 8 or 9 and all,) was the most rewarding thing that Smash has ever given me, or one of the most frustrating if I lost the fight All-in-all, it was one of the most memorable things.Having hidden characters literally added nothing but a dull process of jumping through loops for it. Games should be fun, not chores.
What people find "fun to play" may differ from what you find "fun to play." Personally, I find unlocking characters, stages, trophies, beating personal HRC/event/target records, and etc. extremely fun. I used to spend so hours getting to 999 coins then playing the lottery machine to 0 coins in Melee.Who the hell plays smash to unlock stuff=???
People play Smash because it's fun to play. It's as simple as that.
-[citation needed] for "it's not part of the roster selection." I'll be the first to admit that I think it would be, but not that it's objective.Enough of this "x franchise characters" bulls***. That's not a part of the roster selection, so stop it.
THE ONLY THING CHARACTERS REPRESENT IS THEMSELVES!!!
If you don't know that, then you know nothing.
Mario and Captain Falcon are more alike than Ness and Lucas.
It doesn't feel right to you. That's what you think, to you. You said it yourself. And I'm going to need more than just that to be convinced R.O.B. is a likely cut.
Lucas and Ness, despite have the same FS and sharing 3 of 4 specials are pretty different, Change 5 of Lucas' moves and he's his own character, I think 2 MOTHER characters are fine and it should stay that way. As for ROB he's way to important to Nintendo's history to be cut and got a lot of spotlight in the SSE, I can only see ROB being cut due to lack of time but even then there are characters who would be cut before he is.2 Mother characters just seems like it's far too much. 1 Mother character, absolutely, they're extremely unique, but two.. just seems far too similar. I've been told that Sakurai wanted to replace Ness with "Mother 3 (Lucas)" character for Melee but couldn't due to the delay. Why there are two in Melee, I can't say, but they just don't seem unique enough to each be their own character. Beyond that, the franchise rotates, unlike another arguably over-represented franchise like Star Fox, which leads to little character development over time, making the specific characters hard to stand out from one another.
R.OB. something just doesn't feel right about him, to me. Going back a hundred pages can see my posts regarding R.O.B., but he just seems like out of all the characters that would be cut (I feel like we can expect some cuts,) he's one of the top contenders. Having R.O.B. feels kinda like having Diskun. It just doesn't feel right. Though, of course, R.O.B. is actually capable of doing stuff, unlike some floppy disk.
And Toad, too... showing a picture of Peach's Toad and then saying Peach's moveset "may be refreshed"... most people know that the most common logical fallacy argument against Toad is that Toad cannot be playable if he is part of Peach's moveset and that Peach's moveset will have to be changed in order to let Toad be playable...Sakurai's mindgames are getting pretty annoying. First with the Pyrosphere, and now with Pokemon.
Lucas and Ness, despite have the same FS and sharing 3 of 4 specials are pretty different, Change 5 of Lucas' moves and he's his own character, I think 2 MOTHER characters are fine and it should stay that way. As for ROB he's way to important to Nintendo's history to be cut and got a lot of spotlight in the SSE, I can only see ROB being cut due to lack of time but even then there are characters who would be cut before he is.
R.O.B. getting cut?
Yeah, I don't see that happening.
Better cut Luigi & Jigglypuff thenI tend to care less about moveset or playstyle similarities as I do conceptual similarities. Moveset and playstyle is important in high-level play, but casual play.. it'd be more what it "looks like" as opposed to what the frame/hitbox data says.
Except for MAYBE Snake? SNAKE? SNAAAAAAAKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENo character from Brawl will be cut for any reason, but time constrainsts.
The only exception would be Snake, for the sake of adding a more Nintendo-related Konami rep, and even that is unlikely.No character from Brawl will be cut for any reason, but time constrainsts.
I'd actually prefer that. Bomberman deserves to be in a Nintendo Fighting game way more than he does.The only exception would be Snake, for the sake of adding a more Nintendo-related Konami rep, and even that is unlikely.
This was mentioned in a few above posts.Hell smash even gave you games. Games inside of games!
might I ask why?
also since ROB actually physically existed, isn't he larger than everyone