Oh lordy lord lord. This is quite a distressful distraction. Good post J, but unfortunately you're just wrong about me. I don't even want to respond because I know you've already made your mind up about this long ago and nothing I say is going to convince you. I guess everyone else would still like a response so here we go!
I finally found the post that made me curious about Sword's:
Here is when people have come in and made cases for both slots already and this seems to be Sword's just taking what seem to interest the rest of town as the "majority" scum-reads and tacking on his $0.02 onto it. But let's break it down as to what I am talking about.
He constitutes one of my questions towards Maven as scummy when I was asking why he unprecedentedly brought up the fact of Alphas and not letting them take control of the thread which hadn't even really occurred in the thread. It looked like Maven was trying to throw FUD at Ryker for no reason whatsoever besides his entrance post. That struck a chord with me.
First things first, what you asked Maven about read way more like an attack than a question.
Why did you write this paragraph? It just looks like an attempt to knock Ryker down before he even really got into the game. I mean sure, we all know that Ryker is stubborn but this looks like a little too much of mudslinging/demeaning him for your benefit. Could you point out what you hoped to accomplish posting this?
This is your "question." It clearly reads like you suspected Maven of something, so don't under represent one of my arguments against you. This is what you were responding to:
Maven said:
For those who don't know, Ryker is like a birthday boy. He's sitting in the circle with his paper Mcdonald's crown on demanded we cede every argument to him and let him be the only one who plays "cause it's his birthday". Push him back just as hard as he pushes you, no one cares and will actually like that you do so.
This clearly reads like Maven was just exhibiting his personality. Trying to insist that there was an ulterior motive behind it (such a FUD slinging) seems foolish. Hence my argument that you started out with "force content."
He actually tries to use my "ring vote-count" as a reason to look at me as being scummy but does not explain how. Besides it being a really weak reason, it looks like Swords is really reaching to try and come up with "original" content on me which he then in turns tries to call me out on in the next post by saying that my read on Spak at the time is just "logical" and someone else had already brought it up which was not the case actually. The only person to have said anything on Spak looking townie was Laundry and the consensus at the time was that Spak was looking scummy to WATT/Ryu/Rake/Maven/Rosa. The irony of his statement is that my read on Spak was not "un-original" but the opposite whereas his next scum-read is on, guess who? Spak.
I DID explain why I found the ring vote count thing scummy here, in 302:
J is currently leaning scum to me as a feel he's maintained a presence without actually doing too much of anything. The three main points of concern is his weird attack on Maven, the "event votecount" he kept, and just a lack of original content. Already went over Maven. The "event votecount" thing isn't scummy by itself but coupled with a lack of original content it reads more like filler than genuine usefulness. I just feel like if J was town he would be more interested in that WoT vs. WL thing then he seems right now.
It wasn't just the fact that you did the ring puesdo-votecount, but that was ALL you were doing at the time that I found worrisome. Weak reasoning? Maybe. The case would have been stronger should you have been doing that for a longer time. In matter of fact, I thought about giving you more rope before making any of the accusations I did, just to see if my suspicions would get stronger in time if I left you alone to do your own, natural thing. However, I decided that if I took that philosophy I would be waiting around forever, so I decided to call you out on it then and there.
Wrt Spak, at what point did I ever say he was scum? Yes, I know that I proceeded to question him in just a manner that may imply I found him scummy, but I was doing so because I was looking for how honest/open he was going to be to just direct accusations. The REASON I asked him if he was trying to redirect attention off of him was not because I thought he was scummy but because I was interested in his answer.
There is a red flag in this post as well especially when Spak is being talked about. The red/bolded bit really worries me because Swords seems to not really care about finding scum, but it seems like he is trying to look for easy options on who to lynch which were at the time J/Spak and not much else. But the "regardless of alignment" is something he does for both of his scum-reads. He tries to qualify his responses with outs and excuses for after flips. I can say for certain that from my perspective this looks like what Swords is trying to do. Blanket statements like "regardless of what he flips, I can still call them out on this" is incredibly scummy to me because it is not full committing to the read and also giving an out
How exactly am I looking for easy lynch choices wrt pushing you? I haven't played this game in awhile but I remembered the last time I did that was Rusty Guillotine Day 1 and it did NOT end well for me.
Anyways point being you are NOT an easy push (well apparently you are Day 1 but that's not what I remember). If I wanted to to do that there are other choices I would definitely consider before you.
Wrt Spak you're confusing me being open and honest with my thought process with "not fully committing to a read," because I DID commit to a read. At the end of that post you quoted I sided with a town lean on Spak. Read it pls. Everything before that is the telling of how I arrived at that conclusion.
Btw I 100% stand by that I believe Spak was AtE'ing at the beginning of the game. I just didn't necessarily read scum intent behind it.
So yeah as of pg. 8, I am standing by my Sword's scum read.
Continuing on pg. 8, This post really irks me in it looking like opportunistic WATT hopping onto my wagon. The reason I say it is opportunistic is that WATT comes in and votes me after the dislike for my slot comes around enough for people to vote me. (Fanny/Dancer/Gheb's approval) Also going on at the time WATT's wagon is gaining steam with votes from Laundry/Rake/Gheb which makes me also have a theory. I am thinking currently of a WATT/Dancer scum-team makes a lot of plausible sense. Especially when combined with the course of actions in pg. 8 especially when looking at my slot from a Town perspective. WATT also was on the "let's follow Jmeta" train for D1 until I ask him a question and he starts being backed into a corner so he latches onto my slot.
Here is the vote-post from pg. 10
Tell me, what do you think of WATT's 318? Do you think his vote against you was unfair and if so why?
This post speaks volumes to me because especially under my theory, this is evidence of actions from Fanny starting the wagon for Dancer to jump onto with WATT being able to try and sway the wagon from me onto him. Currently, looking at a WATT/Dancer scum-team. I would also say that Dancer and WATT have a clear disconnect from each other that they have not been commenting on each other in the thread. Dancer did not comment to length on the WATT push which strikes me as odd because he had enough to speak in detail on myself and Spak when WATT was also a cause for concern slot. From these flips I get, a stronger townLaundry read (from his WATT push), an even stronger townSpak read (From Dancer/WATT's collective disgustingly opportunistic push), which puts me ahead in terms of reads for D3 if my theory is consistent
You're completely right, actually. Me and WATT haven't commented on each other much at all during the whole Rake vs. WATT thing. I still haven't really commented on WATT. There's nothing I can really say other than I simply didn't really care about his slot. Why? Poor scumhunting + work fatigue + I simply cared about you more. Yes that last sentence sounds like AtE ut it's the truth like it or not.
see Fanny posting, I am nodding along, I don't get the uber hard-on everyone has for that slot though. I mean a lot of what Fanny says is just "well yeah", but he is dogging my slot and not really doing much else. *shrug* I don't see him fitting into my puzzle of WATT/Dancer currently, but I keep re-reading his posts and keep saying "...and?". I think this may be a playstyle thing though, because in another game that Fanny himself brought up I was able to nail him in a heartbeat when he was scum. However, that was D4. I'm gonna continue to watch Fanny because everyone just seems to be okay with him being town. For now, town by association that I will want to re-look at later.
I am still not feeling Rake scum and it really makes me go "...?" to the people that are reading him as scum. I stand by my reasoning that no one has given me a reason to look at Rake yet and I stand by that even more on re-reading D1. Speaking of people who make me feel good is Kantrip as well. Rake and Kantrip just seem to have a similar way of making me think they are not scummy with just none of their posts just striking a chord with me. They are logical, coherent, feel like townies trying to find scum and not reeking of mal-intent from other slots this game that come to mind. Only problem I have with these slots, which is ironically identical, is their presence comes in short bursts and then they disappear for pages on end. However, when they do post I like them.
K, just quoting to segregate this part from the others.
-Pg. 12; Found my next point of interest against Dancer.
This reads post is Dancer playing the "let's sit on the fence and look like I'm doing things and having read's this game!" I'm gonna hone in on certain things real quick so I'm beating a dead horse with the "I dislike Dancer/his reads are balls passive" He starts to lay back heat on me after my wagon starts losing appeal, he gives himself outs to RR/Rosa, but the curious one is WATT where he fails to take a stance on WATT, but with every other read he's got an opinion. Here he says verbatim:
"...and thus have failed to form an opinion about it. Don't worry guys, I'll get to it I swear!"
Meh, I don't actually have a great defense to this. Keeping my vote on you at that point in the game was ****ty and I can honestly see where you're coming from. My bad.
Wrt RR, I ultimately DID decide that I did not want him lynched yesturDay, so I did follow up on that.
Wrt Rosa, Rosa WAS playing safe and even though it was a mislynch I still hold by what I said about that slot.
Then he continues on to almost beg that people keep Spak on the table, but does nothing to push this besides "Come on guys, don't let him get away!" which goes along with my theory that Dancer isn't scum-hunting, but just appealing to the masses. Literally, with all his reads and him saying "idk where to go" but does nothing to further his scum-hunt or anything. He just sits on reads and harps on them when asked.
What I said about Spak given the context was completely called for. Look at it from my perspective, we have a slot EVERYONE is town reading who's play consists of nothing more than doing "nice" things. Who wouldn't in their right mind find that bothersome?
Another thing that bugs me about Dancer is that he keeps using this phrase which he even has used on D2 which is "I want to lynch J for information" which is a cop out reason to lynch and something I find scummy. Information lynches are fine in my book, but when it is becoming pretty much the only and sole reason to lynch someone on D2, then that is something I find bad. D1 is the day for informational lynches and inactive lynches. D1 I was barely here and using the ploy of my lynch being "informational" was garbage because there were way more slots where everyone had opinions on especially when the mass opinion on me was "J is just being J". So what information was he hoping to obtain from that?
This entire paragraph isn't true at all though! I'm pretty sure I said that ONCE, as a supporting reason for why I wanted to go through with your lynch. Where did I use this Day 2? Quote it for me. I made the post calling for your lynch near the end of Day 1 when I saw that we really didn't have much of a direction to go in. I wanted to give town a solid direction to head in before I left for my v/la, so I knew that I had to be a convincing as possible, which is I included that reasoning which btw it WAS good reaoning!).
Don't tell me that information couldn't have been gained out of your lynch. It was a great lynch for information. In matter of fact, this very post from you is prove of that. You yourself mentioned that WATT's vote on you looked opportunistic. Others have pointed out that Maven's vote on you looked opportunistic. Then there were the people who were just saying that you were just playing to your meta. From my perspective, how could they be so sure?
Here's another point to my theory of a WATT/Dancer scum-team:
One lynch is for "information" while the other is a policy lynch. Yet, he continues to say he has no stance on WATT, but by saying this he knows that WATT is up for a lynch. That brings again that disconnect of Dancer not willing to put a solid feel on WATT and distancing himself from that plus offering up "solutions" against his lynch.
Moving on, why does Rosa "like" all of my posts, but then says I'm scummy. I did not get her lol.
Rosa wagon snap did not have much evidence of anything honestly besides just a bunch of quick pile on votes. The only one that stuck out to me was Kantrip's who said "I am voting Rosa because she is one of my scum-reads" rather than everyone who was like "lol deadline" and that actually gives Kanty more town-points in my opinion because I do not feel scum would be that set on saying they were backing a read of theirs if they "knew" it was going to flip unfavorable to their statement.
And those are my notes from D1. I am gonna wrap up this post so I may continue onto D2, but I have been here for a majority of D2 so I am just going to stick to the latter portion where I left off.
Scum: WATT/Dancer
Town: Spak, Laundry, Kanty, Rake
Indy feels: Maven/Fanny
What do: Ryu/Ryker
So I am deadset on the WATT/Dancer train and will be gunning for them for blood at this juncture. I am pretty comfy with my town reads currently and really see no reason to discuss them. Earlier I was talking about Indy feels around Maven and I still stand by that he would be my biggest read for Indy and then I would have Fanny be next in line for that. I do not get the overwhelming town-vibes from Fanny and just a lot of him saying the same thing a lot like a parrot since people have called him town for that earlier. Maven is more because of his explosive lash outs when people call him scum (I.e. Gheb v. Maven), but I do not get scum-team vibes from either. I am also not really looking at indy's because although we have proof that an indy exists in mod-confirmed info and what appears to be their way of killing (poisoning via Laundry claiming it). However, Laundry has claimed to be cured so I the Indy is already having a foot in the ground regarding their kills.
With the What Do category is simply put, I don't know where they go. That's my null pile because I do like quite a bit of what Ryker is posting but I have no clear reason to call him town. Plus I dislike the Rake push so that puts him in a unfavorable light in my eyes, especially with WATT being on it as well. Ryu's claim is janky and also just meh to read and when reading D1, his early play did read as scummy but then near the end he became more genuine and I know scumRyu is much more disgenuine. I am just uneasy to put that slot onto either side. I would lean probably scum on Ryu and town on Ryker on gut though.
I am operating under the idea that with a killing Indy the scum-team would make sense to be a 2 person team with an Indy floating around. So that's why me reads are as such.
Anyways, I'm tired and need to take a breather before moving onto D2 because this post took up a large chunk of my night/morning and it is now the afternoon I am realizing when I started this post at like 5am my time.....lordy...
Okay, so here's the thing:
You're right about one thing in particular, Day 1 I didn't follow up like I should have in several instances. I think I was justified to push you early but the later it got the more lazy I became and I let my vote sit on you when I should not have. The thing is is that what you've noticed is not scum play but just bad play, but it's a good observation that I'll take as constructive criticism should I play mafia again in the future.
Anyways you're about to be mega frustrated with me J but I want to reevaluate my reads, reason being that even though I just rebutted your post I actually really liked it + I liked your play coming into toDay and now I really don't feel like I have a solid direction. I'm not even confident in Ryu who was my other scum pick, as other have said it doesn't make sense from a scum perspective to have randomly claimed the things he did.
I can't give you a timestamp, but we gave you a whole Day to play! So fair is fair, right?