but we havent had any bundles for just characters announced. Now you're adding to ANOTHER variable into the mix :/
Yes I know, we hadn't had any as of yet, but it makes sense to do so, especially with Sakurai's variety of choices that range from popular to unpopular. It's not hard to understand. :<
and as for "being a villain"
you're guilty of it as well. this is very snarky. even if you dont intend it, anyone you are calling a villain doesnt intend it either.
I know, just word it differently to make it nice, that's all you have to do guys.
I can't just sit there and let the YL fanbase feel discouraged you know. :/
You're contradicting yourself. You say that Young Link has enough appeal to sell, while also acknowledging that Young Link would need a revamp or a bundle to sell best.
And honestly, all this talk of bundles and revamps... These are just excuses to add Young Link, a way of justifying his inclusion while dancing around the fundamental problems.
Yeah I suppose that's a contradiction, but bundling
is a way to make Young Link sell.
If anything that's Nintendo's problem moreso than Sakurai's really, it's not going to affect the character's chances, Nintendo
would know to bundle a less-demanded character with a highly demanded one in order for him to sell, it's more of an aftermath after Sakurai decides who he wants added as DLC.
It's not to say it would make him justifiable, but to give people a good deal and also satisfy people who him back to main him again.
So I'm a villain because I mentioned the possiblity that he could be biased towards Young Link.
The way you word does sound like it to be honest. Let's just end that right there
Roy is the only safe Melee option left and is unique enough to pass for a semi-clone.
Pichu's injury mechanic gives him an edge? No, last time I checked, damaging yourself even on friggin' normal attacks does not make you desirable in any fighting game. Just play Lucario if you want to do something about dat damage.
Indeed that's what I said, his injuring mechanic makes him a diverse character from Pikachu, enough
to have no real reason to change his moveset, didn't say anything about making him desireable.
Please answer this question: would you buy Young Link as a clone? You bringing up the fact that he could use some amount of a revamp can be equally applied to the other two Melee cuts. Even then, it's a gamble if Sakurai will even be willing to revamp a clone
Yes, if it's a Smash Bros. character, then I'm likely buying it anyway regardless if it's who I want or not.
Can I just point out how ABSURD this argument is?
You are talking to the Smash 4 customers. The people, here on Smashboards, are the people most interested in Smash 4. We are the people who are following the announcements, and we are THE MOST LIKELY people to buy DLC.
Marketing data will show you, for any game, that DLC is not purchased nearly as much by casual fans as it is by hardcore ones. Casual fans buy the game, play it for a period of time, and move on. The more invested the player, the longer they stick with it, and the more they are willing to invest in it going forward.
We are telling you his appeal won't sell. Because WE WON'T BUY IT. If we "just don't see" the appeal, then that means that Young Link DOESN'T HAVE THAT APPEAL, because WE are the customers who would be BUYING him.
I get it already and I'm already aware of he's less demanded.
But isn't the presence of DLC characters enough to get casual and hardcore alike. That's the main appeal to fans really. He isn't targeting just Smashboards, but also wide variety of people, all of them whom have different wants and desires,