Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Almost everyone, at least to an extent, was worried Melee would die. So unless you're saying everyone was short-sighted, idk what you're arguing. Just go read some threads from that time period. Hell, even the doc covered this topic. I hate to bring join dates into arguments but yours is pretty indicative of your naivety on the community's history.C'mon Bones.
When Brawl came out it was beating Melee. The people that thought that would continue/last and Melee would fade away were short-sighted, they were wrong. That's about as simple and straightforward as it gets, can't explain it in any simpler terms.
I know the history, not every one was afraid Melee would die (I certainly wasn't). If you're looking to throw insults based on empty assumptions or start an argument you can PM me. Continue on this thread and I won't bother wasting time to respond.Almost everyone, at least to an extent, was worried Melee would die. So unless you're saying everyone was short-sighted, idk what you're arguing. Just go read some threads from that time period. Hell, even the doc covered this topic. I hate to bring join dates into arguments but yours is pretty indicative of your naivety on the community's history.
I believe that I was the FIRST person to say that Brawl was going to be terrible compared to melee and that in the future Melee would still be the preferred game (for tournaments)C'mon Bones.
When Brawl came out it was beating Melee only cause it was new but it didn't offer what Melee could. The people that thought that would continue/last and Melee would fade away were short-sighted, they were wrong. That's about as simple and straightforward as it gets, can't explain it in any simpler terms.
Being personally worried is not the same as the community being worried.I know the history, not every one was afraid Melee would die (I certainly wasn't). If you're looking to throw insults based on empty assumptions or start an argument you can PM me. Continue on this thread and I won't bother wasting time to respond..
Or perhaps it's clear evidence that my local scene still supported Melee and I didn't have a sheep mentality?Being personally worried is not the same as the community being worried.
Keep in mind that with the exception of M2K, Brawl killed the original pantheon of smash gods.
Let that sink in for a minute. The best players at the time thought brawl had killed melee and quit.
I personally watched several communities of smash players dissolve, and close friends leave the scene forever.
A lot of people thought large scale competitive melee was over, that it would be relegated to side events like smash 64 was (at the time), and that we had our heyday.
Brawl nearly destroyed this community, and saying anything other than that is clear evidence that you either weren't paying attention at all or are in serious denial.
Your local scene isn't a microcosm of the national scene, nobody's is. People who supported melee and only melee at brawl's release were in the extreme minority at the time. Almost every major player tried to play brawl for varying periods of time and gave up. Some of them went back to melee and revived it.Or perhaps it's clear evidence that my local scene still supported Melee and I didn't have a sheep mentality?
I'm not trying to force any argument, and neither is bones (most of the time). We are getting offended because you are posting **** like this:To those that left the scene and gave up. That's exactly what I just said and both of you seem to be offended by it, desperately wanting to force an argument (it seems you didn't properly read my initial comment correctly, Bones took it off into a weird tangent and now you are paraphrasing things I never even implied).
People desperately wanted brawl to be competitive. Those of us there from early in melee's inception remember how long it took before we discovered advanced tactics, everyone who was anyone wanted to discover them and be one of the first technical players in a new game. Many of us gave brawl some serious effort trying to unlock and understand it, but to no avail. Calling those people short-sighted and lacking commitment because the game failed to have any depth is not only unfair, it's insulting.The majority initially were short sighted and allowed others to influence their opinions. It shows that they didn't really have the commitment to stick it out anyways, you both seem to be taking my observation very personal for some reason.
Again, your local scene is not a microcosm of the national scene. Your experiences are uniquely yours and you cannot pass judgement or make blanket statements based on only that experience.To me it was obvious that Melee would comeback, Brawl was so atrocious and was such an obvious devolution of the series. All the locals I played Melee with hated Brawl.
My main point of contention is that very few veterans "stuck it out". Many of them tried very hard to make brawl awesome and failed, then came back to melee. If there was some "veteran core" of melee players left when brawl was released there would've still been large scale tourneys with both brawl and melee during that time, but it's pretty easy to see that melee tourneys of any size didn't return until after a nearly year-long dormancy.All the other veterans stuck it out and eventually helped usher the revivals of Melee because they saw that the game still offered something Brawl couldn't and that tons of others were still as passionate as they were about it.
You have my permission toBrawl nearly destroyed this community
Your local scene isn't a microcosm of the national scene, nobody's is. People who supported melee and only melee at brawl's release were in the extreme minority at the time. Almost every major player tried to play brawl for varying periods of time and gave up. Some of them went back to melee and revived it.
I'm not trying to force any argument, and neither is bones (most of the time). We are getting offended because you are posting **** like this:
Again, your local scene is not a microcosm of the national scene. Your experiences are uniquely yours and you cannot pass judgement or make blanket statements based on only that experience.
.
This right here. Eventually the scene will get smaller and disappear from the spotlight and major tournaments because time keeps moving and nothing lasts forever, but it will never truly die.Considering competitive Zelda (the original one for NES) is still a thing..... yeah Melee isn't going anywhere.
Hey it's the guy with the Mario trigger! Good to see you again!This thread used to be cool.
You made some good points, but this part isn't exactly true. Melee and 64 were made by Hal, Brawl was made by a combination of Hal and Sora, and Sm4sh was made by Sora and Namco-Bandai, so Brawl was made by Hal as well.64 and Melee were made by Hal, Brawl and 4 were not. The director is the same for all the games. Look at how different the first 2 play compared to the later 2.
Game arts was the main developer for Brawl. I believe Hal helped with music and giving the brawl development team the melee development tools, but they didn't do much else, if anything else.You made some good points, but this part isn't exactly true. Melee and 64 were made by Hal, Brawl was made by a combination of Hal and Sora, and Sm4sh was made by Sora and Namco-Bandai, so Brawl was made by Hal as well.
OK, I wasn't sure how much Hal did what because a lot of companies did at least some work on it, but I remembered Hal was at least in part of the production process. Also, I wasn't saying you said Sm4sh was made by Hal. I was just clarifying the developers of the games.Game arts was the main developer for Brawl. I believe Hal helped with music and giving the brawl development team the melee development tools, but they didn't do much else, if anything else.
And where did I say Smash 4 was made by Hal?
We all learn something new.OK, I wasn't sure how much Hal did what because a lot of companies did at least some work on it, but I remembered Hal was at least in part of the production process. Also, I wasn't saying you said Sm4sh was made by Hal. I was just clarifying the developers of the games.
SupHey it's the guy with the Mario trigger! Good to see you again!
Your profile picture makes that response perfect.
I wish Worms 2 still had US servers :'(Melee will never be dead. There was always a large following for the entire series.
I've been playing a very old and not very popular or mainstream game and it is still going sting after 15 years. There aren't very many people playing but it still has servers with 50+.
Smash is just to big to ever go extinct.
I wouldn't use the word "obsolete" until an official game with a higher skill cap and gameplay that is nearly as fast and technical comes out.It has been obsolete for about six years now and the only thing fueling it is the obsessive nature of its fanbase.
I agree with this soooo much.the idea that everyone needs a job and to start a family and buy a house is an old school idea that only hurts people burys others in debt.
reflexes do not lower with age. reflexes actually INCREASE with age. they start to taper off around age 50-60+. science. and i think if were ever going to move competitive gaming into the spotlight we need to move away from this notion of being too old to play video games. there is no such thing as being too old. thats a scruby mindset. for the first time in human history we have large groups of the human race that dont need to get jobs or contribute to society in anyway. the idea that everyone needs a job and to start a family and buy a house is an old school idea that only hurts people burys others in debt. we dont live on farms anymore. you dont need to get up everyday as a child and work your fathers land or your family STARVES TO DEATH. society is so rich right now that people can choose to live life through their ambitions rather than conform to an outdated idea of "growing up". we have competitive poker for christ sakes. esports is coming and it will be bigger than any sport event. games have taken over the world.
Not sure if I dig that mindset... I feel like having a reliable source of income at least until you can safely transition to a full entertainment or e-sports occupation is a good idea. If you listen to accounts of youtubers before they got popular, a lot of them had jobs and just did the whole making videos thing as a hobby. This might change over time as the average age of youtube stars might start getting younger (merely a hypothesis with little data to back it up), but I feel like doing e-sports or internet entertainment full-time isn't really a safe occupation at the moment... I wouldn't put all of my eggs in one basket if the basket breaking could cause me to not have a main source of income and lose pretty much everything.for the first time in human history we have large groups of the human race that dont need to get jobs or contribute to society in anyway.
This is a joke right? Like, you're not actually trying to justify sitting on your ass and doing nothing for anyone your whole life, right?we have large groups of the human race that dont need to get jobs or contribute to society in anyway.
You don't need a family, sure, I can dig that. But you're not seriously suggesting that you can just opt out of the working world because you're a fan of Melee, are you?the idea that everyone needs a job and to start a family and buy a house is an old school idea that only hurts people
Walk outside of your house, man. A ten second internet search says 14.5% of Americans live below the poverty line. 14.3% of Americans suffered from starvation last year. This isn't just wrong, it's completely insulting.society is so rich right now that people can choose to live life through their ambitions
Squire I think your words might be wasted. After initially saying something like "reflexes do not lower with age. reflexes actually INCREASE with age. they start to taper off around age 50-60+. science." it seemed quite apparent everything that followed was going to be candy-land facts and opinions.This is a joke right? Like, you're not actually trying to justify sitting on your *** and doing nothing for anyone your whole life, right?
You don't need a family, sure, I can dig that. But you're not seriously suggesting that you can just opt out of the working world because you're a fan of Melee, are you?
Walk outside of your house, man. A ten second internet search says 14.5% of Americans live below the poverty line. 14.3% of Americans suffered from starvation last year. This isn't just wrong, it's completely insulting.
I didn't realize you lived in Candy Land, where everyone can just play video games for a living and we don't need an infrastructure because... we're... rich?.. or something?
Once again, another perfect response.