• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Is it really THAT surprising that Metaknight and Snake are top tier?

LavisFiend

Smash Lord
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
1,713
Location
Alexandria, Louisiana
Seriously, think about it.

If you think of Metaknight as a representation of Sakurai, and Snake as a representation of Kojima, then what have you here is a bias.

It is common sense that Snake got in because Kojima begged him too, and it has already been established that they are buddy-buddy with one another.

We also know by now how Sakurai just LOOOVES to give his franchise the special treatment. There is evidence all over the place to back that claim up. It is also not surprising if you consider just how grossly popular Metaknight was before the game made it to our wii's. He is the "cool" factor of Kirby, and snake is the "cool" third party character.

Truth be told, it would be much more effective had Kirby been a top tier character, but that would really give it a way.

My point is that Sakurai obviously played favorites by making Metaknight how he is, and Snake how he is. It was no error in beta testing. You can't hide their superb movesets. They are beasts by moveset and insane priority.

So there you have it: The top tier characters are in fact, representations of two buddy developers trying to reign superiority over the rest of the characters because they believe their franchises can do no wrong.
 

eskimo bob

Smash Apprentice
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
149
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
tell me... why hasn't he made kirby as good as he was in ssb64 then? in fact in melee he was one of the worst characters and you don't really have to know about the competitive community at all to know that.
 

LavisFiend

Smash Lord
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
1,713
Location
Alexandria, Louisiana
tell me... why hasn't he made kirby as good as he was in ssb64 then? in fact in melee he was one of the worst characters and you don't really have to know about the competitive community at all to know that.
I already covered that.

Besides, Kirby is a lot better than how he was in Melee.
 

Crazy_mofo213

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
1,233
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
It wasn't really surprising after all like you said Metaknight is Sakurai's creation. Kojima probaly paid Sakurai to buff up Snake. That or they're really good friends like you said.
 

Zero

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
5,825
Location
ワイヤード
We already know that Brawl was massively influenced by Sakurai's creations, so Meta Knight being the way he is is not suprising at all. We also know Kojima basically begged for Snake to be added, albiet with a lot of money to coerce him, so Snake being amazing isn't suprising either.

No, not at all.
 

flyinfilipino

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
4,319
Location
North Carolina
We also know by now how Sakurai just LOOOVES to give his franchise the special treatment. There is evidence all over the place to back that claim up. It is also not surprising if you consider just how grossly popular Metaknight was before the game made it to our wii's. He is the "cool" factor of Kirby, and snake is the "cool" third party character.
But he only added two more characters to his franchise's roster after two games. I agree though, I knew Meta Knight and Snake would be great from the beginning, they just looked so cool.
 

Patsie

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
441
Location
Nashville, Tennessee
I mean, when I just first got the game, I thought Snake was absolutely horrible, until I discovered his tilts.

I still hate playing with him, he's not my playstyle at all.
 

ADHD

Smash Hero
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
7,194
Location
New Jersey
Who cares, he took out everything that made brawl good. Hitstun, etc.

And here we have what? Snake.....? Meta.......?

lol......
 

retro gamer 6

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Messages
382
Location
in o-town, florida
not surprised really surprised. thats why i hate meta knight! snake i can handle. but yea sakurai was bias towards meta knight (should've buffed kirby some more instead).
 

Puddin

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
1,333
Location
Na'wlans
It really isn't that suprising. Mainly because there have to be top tiers, so if it's Sakurais baby and Mr. Tight *** then so be it, but if not them then some other character people would complain about.
 

LP4Life666

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
427
I believe LavisFiend is actually onto something here. One could assume that, Snake being announced the first "third-party" character, he received special attention. I totally do not doubt this. However, by his logic, would Donkey Kong be considered the favored one of Nintendo, since he can counter both MK AND Snake? No, it's just the way things happened to work out.

Also, look at the trend among newcomers vs. the original 12. Where do they all stand in comparison, now? In melee: Sheik, Falco, and Marth were the newcomers, and they were all top-tier. In Brawl, it turned into Snake, MK, and (arguably) Dedede. THEY became the strongest characters in the game.

Basically what I'm saying is: The newcomers are generally more powerful. People WANT this to happen. They don't want the characters that they were so hyped up for to suck in comparison to the already established characters.

-LP
 

Neo M.J

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
159
But he only added two more characters to his franchise's roster after two games. I agree though, I knew Meta Knight and Snake would be great from the beginning, they just looked so cool.
But theres hardly any important character left from Kirby now, the only other guy that I can think of who even has a chance left is Zero and he has the Ridley syndrome.
 

Bowser King

Have It Your Way
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,737
Location
Ontario, Canada
I'm not surprised. Even in SSE kirby and the rest are given extra roles then the more important characters. Mario had less of a role then kirby, meta and D3.
 

0RLY

A great conversation filler at bars and parties
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
2,681
Location
Temple University, Philadelphia
I'm not surprised. Even in SSE kirby and the rest are given extra roles then the more important characters. Mario had less of a role then kirby, meta and D3.
Snake even gets to save the princesses while Mario and Link are off fighting... yep, you guessed it... goombas. >_>
 

Dark Nemesis

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
80
Location
Norway
Meta Knight is Sakurai's second born baby. Of course he made him the best.

And to all Snake mainers: You should be thanking Kojima's blowjob skills. That's probably why he's god tier.
 

~Peachy~

Creator of delicious desserts
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
1,423
Location
<3
of course its surprising, everybody knows that falcon should of been top tier instead of them.
Ummmmmm... no.

But then again, he shouldn't have been made this bad either.:ohwell: Oh well, there's no use in complaining, what good will it do?

And its funny how almost every topic on here is a ______ bashing party, a huge debate on Melee and Brawl, a newbie asking for help for something although there's a topic right in the stickies, or a someone Spamming just for the heck of it. Well, I guess its just the flow of the General Brawl Discussion sub-forum.;)

Anyway, I guess you can say its kinda biased. But do game makers really put advantages to their favorite characters? We should get proof to see if other competitive games follow this behavior as well.

And am I the only one who thinks Nintendo is having a R.O.B fetish? He was in Mario Kart DS, a racing game. And now he's in Brawl, a fighting game. What's next? Will he be in some other Nintendo sports game?;)
 

flyinfilipino

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
4,319
Location
North Carolina
And am I the only one who thinks Nintendo is having a R.O.B fetish? He was in Mario Kart DS, a racing game. And now he's in Brawl, a fighting game. What's next? Will he be in some other Nintendo sports game?;)
When I saw your Peach avatar, pink text, and excess of smileys, I feared for the worst :ohwell:*

If R.O.B. is a character in another game, he'll be a secret character, because Nintendo is afraid to just come out with it! They want R.O.B. to be Nintendo's new mascot.


*but thankfully, you pull it off much better than other people I've seen
 

~Peachy~

Creator of delicious desserts
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
1,423
Location
<3
When I saw your Peach avatar, pink text, and excess of smileys, I feared for the worst :ohwell:*

If R.O.B. is a character in another game, he'll be a secret character, because Nintendo is afraid to just come out with it! They want R.O.B. to be Nintendo's new mascot.


*but thankfully, you pull it off much better than other people I've seen

Not all Peach maining, pink texting, smiley-spammers are arrogant and stupid idiots you know.;)

Just wanted to point that out.;)
 

White Pikmin

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 9, 2008
Messages
258
Location
Behind You
Yeah, i got flammed for saying this before, but...

"You really think the best charater in the game would be a nintendo charater?"

I think its sad how its a nintendo game, then some dude comes in with grenades and C4s, then he's the best
 

727272216

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
32
Location
*scoff* Yeah, right.
lol
That's pretty funny.

But yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if R.O.B. was in another Nintendo game. (of course, they'll have to make the jump from Mario games to Nintendo. lol Mario -> Zelda -> Kirby -> Fire Emblem lawlz)
 

Sosuke

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
25,073
Switch FC
8132-9932-4710
No, its not.
But then Sonic should be to miright?
 

PCHU

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
1,901
Location
Jackson, Tennessee
I used to think Snake was the worst character in the game (well, just bad in general) but look at him now......

I thought the same of Falco, but look at him now.
And KDDD.....I never expected anything out of him.
Pikachu scares me.
It's thunder has to be a mistake.
 

WolfCypher

Smash Lord
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
1,303
NNID
WolfCypher
Switch FC
4999 6039 1484
Seriously, think about it.

If you think of Metaknight as a representation of Sakurai, and Snake as a representation of Kojima, then what have you here is a bias.

It is common sense that Snake got in because Kojima begged him too, and it has already been established that they are buddy-buddy with one another.

We also know by now how Sakurai just LOOOVES to give his franchise the special treatment. There is evidence all over the place to back that claim up. It is also not surprising if you consider just how grossly popular Metaknight was before the game made it to our wii's. He is the "cool" factor of Kirby, and snake is the "cool" third party character.

Truth be told, it would be much more effective had Kirby been a top tier character, but that would really give it a way.

My point is that Sakurai obviously played favorites by making Metaknight how he is, and Snake how he is. It was no error in beta testing. You can't hide their superb movesets. They are beasts by moveset and insane priority.

So there you have it: The top tier characters are in fact, representations of two buddy developers trying to reign superiority over the rest of the characters because they believe their franchises can do no wrong.
Coincidence, a Smash fan theory, and nothing more. If, say, SSB4 was made by Gamefreak, and Pikachu was top tier, then SSB5 was developed by Miyamoto and Mario was top tier, THEN I'd see a pattern. But that scenario is unpractical. As far as it stands with Brawl, MK, and Snake, what you're saying is quite possible, or just a coincidence.

I read a person's post here months ago about how, no matter how balanced you try and make a character in the development stages, once the game comes out the player will see just how balanced or unbalanced a character is. Sakurai probably had no intention of making Fox as good as he was in Melee. Sakurai probably figured "Fox is fast as hell, but his attacks are fairly weak. Fox has amazing combo-potential, but his weight makes him very easy to KO. There's enough pros and cons...Fox seems balanced." Then the gaming pros took a whack at things and we all discovered how insanely good Fox is. Ideally, the character seems balanced, but its not until the game is released and after countless hours of playing the game that you realize how good or bad a character really is.

There's nothing proving or disproving the topic creator's hypothesis, but that's all it is, a hypothesis. Until the unlikely day that Sakurai takes a lie-detector test and its proven that he purposely made MK and Snake top tier, we can only make an a$$ out of u & me.
 

AmigoOne

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Messages
307
In any case, even if it wasn't intentional to make them top tier, it's pretty obvious of where the bias is.
With Snake, there WAS no "He's X good, but he'll have Y weakness" in attributes. His speed, knockback, power, and recovery are ALL ridiculous. ALL his moves are KILL moves. He gets super armor type attributes while in his up b, his up b cypher hits above to prevent some attempts for spiking. He's ridiculously heavy for his mobility and recovery. Heavy, but fast (in move lag like tilts). Fast, but hard hitting. Heavy and hard hitting, but with a ridiculously good recovery?

For MK it makes a little bit more sense and isn't as bad, since he originally had wings and be lighting fast with his strikes, it's a bit more believable, his attributes fit a bit better and doesn't semi contradict each other with weakness that should be there but isn't. Still pretty unbalanced though.

Kirby, MK, DDD, all have their share of broken attributes or moves or whatever.

Character attributes may be left up in the air, but if we look at SSE, it's like swinging a brick to the face obvious. If it wasn't for DDD or Kirby, basically, Tabuu would've won. DDD had to be the one to miraculously make the buttons to revive people. DDD had to be the guy to come back to rescue everyone after Tabuu. Kirby had to be to only one out of the decimated group by tabuu to be revived. Kirby had to be the one to come in and singlehandedly demolish the huge spaceship thing that ganondorf and bowser had. Heck, Kirby was the first person you had to start out with. Mario gets owned in the face and the princesses get caught. Who saves the day? Kirby.

/rant
 

Chileno4Live

Smash Ace
Joined
Feb 21, 2008
Messages
661
Location
Almere, The Netherlands
NNID
Xyronith
3DS FC
0731-5336-4808
im just a noob, but i think that the player controlling the characters decides if its good or not. I cant play snake or MK at all. They dont suit my playing style. And btw, Mr game and watch is also very good in this game
 

AnAardvark

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
466
Location
Looking For Someone To Falcon Punch!
I'm pretty sure Sakurai didn't purposely give Meta Knight an advantage, because how I see it, Meta Knight IS a fast comboer. Snake on the other hand might have been given some advantages on purpose. All of his moves have a purpose and an advantage. His tilts can all KO at small percentages. Yeah, I think you're right about Snake being purposely given some advantages. :ohwell:
 

SirKibble

Smash Champion
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
2,400
Now let's explain Game & Watch via this theory...

Oops. Never mind.

Seriously, though, I'm sure if there was bias, it was subconscious and unintentional. I mean, if I were making the characters, I'd probably naturally make those I liked cooler/better, without meaning to. It's just something we do as humans, nothing you can blame him for.
 

Veggi

Smash Champion
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
2,590
Location
I'm gonna wreck it! (Fort Myers)
Now let's explain Game & Watch via this theory...

Oops. Never mind.

Seriously, though, I'm sure if there was bias, it was subconscious and unintentional. I mean, if I were making the characters, I'd probably naturally make those I liked cooler/better, without meaning to. It's just something we do as humans, nothing you can blame him for.
What I don't understand though is that Sakurai made Snake's moveset, but some of the things he has are unbelievable. Look at his forward tilt, it has crazy range that goes a good distance beyond where he actually hits and does 21%, that's insane. Now look at his up tilt, same thing and they both KO well. Even his standard A combo KO's well. Plus he's the 3rd heaviest character in the game, but he looks no where near as heavy as some of the other characters. I'd understand more if he was a good deal lighter than Samus. How could Sakurai not notice how good he was?
 

SirKibble

Smash Champion
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
2,400
What I don't understand though is that Sakurai made Snake's moveset, but some of the things he has are unbelievable. Look at his forward tilt, it has crazy range that goes a good distance beyond where he actually hits and does 21%, that's insane. Now look at his up tilt, same thing and they both KO well. Even his standard A combo KO's well. Plus he's the 3rd heaviest character in the game, but he looks no where near as heavy as some of the other characters. I'd understand more if he was a good deal lighter than Samus. How could Sakurai not notice how good he was?
That, my friend, is an excellent question.
 

1337marth

Smash Ace
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
693
Location
Why should I tell you? Kentucky
I think Metaknight should be, but not snake. Snake is too weird for me. I don't like his moves. Also tiers mean nothing, just what people think are the best, that don't matter, just learn to play as a character, and become great as it, it could be anyone, and then you could beat anyone. Kinda like Gimpyfish's Bowser.
 

BEES

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
1,051
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Isn't Captain Falcon Sakurai's favorite character? Explain that one. He was good in the last two games, but c'mon. At least Pichu had some priority.
 
Top Bottom