• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Interesting Pokeball discovery

IWontGetOverTheDam

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
1,798
Location
MN
Last night, I turned on Pokeballs and started throwing just to get Mew. In the midst of this, I discovered something rather interesting. It seems that if you get a Gardivoir and you throw another ball, the Pokemon is highly likely to be another Gardivoir. This happened no less than eight times in my 30 minute match. What do you think?
 

Bowser King

Have It Your Way
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,737
Location
Ontario, Canada
it's possible but Im going to go with that its random. Stuff like that has happened a lot to me like if I through a certain pokemon then through one right after I get the same pokemon. Still I think it's just a coincidence.
 

IWontGetOverTheDam

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
1,798
Location
MN
Could be, but eight times in a half hour match? Seems a little too often to be random. It got to the point that if I got Gardivoir, I said to myself "bet this next one is..."
 

SSJ4Kazuki

Smash Champion
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
2,605
Location
UK (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Someone in Wales. Must play against you. Send me a PM.

A member by the name of "itsameSMB" is working on his theory that Pokeballs are far from random.
I don't believe it, but it's pretty cool how much work he's putting in.

I've frequently thrown latios AND THEN latias from 2 consecutive pokeballs, right next to each other.

And I've seen a Youtube video in which two Kyogres appeared.
 

Wave⁂

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
11,870
Testing with throwing 2 Pokeballs at a time with the IC's may yield different results... this is interesting...
 

Spire

III
BRoomer
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
15,079
Location
Texas
I get double Gardevoirs all the time. Out of all Pokemon to get doubles of, I get a trash one like it.

For the record, I have gotten double Kyogres and double Groudons also before. Furthermore, if you release Groudon, the odds of releasing a Kyogre go way up, and vice versa. I've had the two on stage many, many times before.
 

Stroupes

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
1,810
Location
Tennessee
I would say that it's random, but it seems that it could possibly be something more than that.
 

Spire

III
BRoomer
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
15,079
Location
Texas
well if the odds of getting Mew and other rare pokemon are extremely slim than the pokemon are not random at all
Precisely. Mew, Celebi, and Jirachi (and perhaps Deoxys) all have a 1 in 493 chance of appearing, and that is a set percentage. Other Pokemon must also have a set percentage like Wobbuffet, Bonsly (I got about 5 in a row once), Munchlax, etc. Then of course, the other legendaries would appear very rarely, so everything is set, or at least every Pokemon has a set percentage and that number is tossed into a randomizer from which Pokemon are then drawn. For instance: if Meowth was a 150/493 chance Pokemon, then you would have a 32.8% chance of getting it (out of 100).
 

OmegaXXII

Fire Emblem Lord/ Trophy Hunter
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
21,468
Location
Houston, Texas!
I think this Gardivoir thing was a coincidence, because like Spire said, if they all have a set ratio it probably means that it would increase the chances
 

bioniclekid8

Smash Cadet
Joined
May 9, 2008
Messages
44
in 1 hour i got about 23 torchics ( I was having a 99 life brawl-athon as TL) Coincidence, or not :veryconfu
 

The Halloween Captain

Smash Master
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,331
Location
The northeast
The same type of thing happens a lot with the random character selecetion. I think for some reason, the game has a little less trouble doing repeats than random selection every time.
 

majora_787

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
6,122
Location
Texas
This happened to me with munchlax. I got all muchlax except for three bonsly and two metagross. it was an all pokeball match tha tlasted two minutes, obviously that's a lot of munchlax. :laugh:
 

Negi-Kun

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
1,494
Location
Plastic Beach
i noticed that too. i played around with pokeballs too.
have you ever got six munchlaxes in a row? i have which is weird
 

GimmeAnFSharp

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
291
Location
Boston
Could it have anything to do with stage selections? I notice I get legendaries more on the Stadium stages.
 

Sai Winner of Games

Smash Cadet
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
72
Location
somewhere between the 10th and 11th dimensions
NNID
SpiralDragon
3DS FC
1822-0827-5656
These types of things are fairly common when random number generating algorithms are involved. Basically, computers cannot really generate truly random numbers, you would need a decaying radioisotope to do that. If you are doing something like Monte Carlo approximations, for example, it can be pretty important what algorithm you use, since it could increase the uncertainty of your calculation if you use one that has results that deviate from a perfectly random probability distribution (uniform distribution for Brawl purposes, I think). The Wii probably uses a very simple algorithm or maybe even stored sets of random numbers to output (probably to increase performance), so that is probably what is causing these seemingly nonrandom results.

There is also observer bias. You will pay more attention to results that do not happen often, because you were not expecting them, but the results can still be consistant with the (uniform) distribution of values we expect. To prove that something is random or not with confidence you would need more way samples. Unless someone wants to run detailed experiments and calculate the p values to prove otherwise, we can assume that these things are done based on a random number generated by the Wii.

/thread?
 
Top Bottom