Gova
I'm goin' for it!
cool pic, bro does it come with refutation?
look, here's what happened you asked that question, he ignored it, you asked about it again, he refused to answer it because it wasn't going anywhere, you think it's scummy of him
so far so good yeah?
this quote seems to back that up
you don't like raz for that series of posts. why? because you've said it's "mechanical" and "safe" or "non-committal" and "sidelining"before he answered our jab at him
aka this:
this is what i don't like raz for
so, his reasoning for dodging that question, which is that there is no point in making a stance because it's gonna be lolidunno/rvs
but then you get on him for refusing to make a pointless stance which came from the question of [why would you start this wagon on soup].
the belows quote shows you doing exactly that; ie he didn't take a stance -> means he's non-committal and sidelining
No, I'm calling you scummy for being non-committal and sidelining in a period of the game where mafia absolutely love to avoid the **** out of taking stances on things actually going on.
turns out it wouldn't have matter though, in a hypothetical, if he had answered your question of [why would you start this wagon on soup] you would have ignored it and still hated his entrance into the game anyways. what's the deal then why you getting on his case for refusing to answer something you were gonna ignore anyways?He thinks our ire lies completely in the question we asked and his response to it; it's not. Our ire with him lies first and foremost with the fact that he dodged everything going on and then the fact that he dug his heels in the dirt when tried to get him to take a stance. I've seen him cockblock direction out of RVS for the dumbest of reasons before but he at least tried to generate some type of stances out of it. This is different.
sooo uhhh yeah if you were just gonna ignore it anywaysFor the last time, No. That's not why.
I ignore your response and still hate your initial entrance into the game because it's still why I hate you. What part of "it was the cherry on top of the actual point of my distaste" did you miss?
what's the below quote about; you call him gross for not taking a stance that you were planning on ignoring
also, i'd just like to point raz, wasn't forced to comment on the soup wagon no one asked/forced/coerced him to make all these postsThis is all he did in RVS. Despite a budding wagon on Soup, to which Soup was clearly reacting and feedback was being generated from other players (Potato, Fanny, you to a lesser extent, Scary had a couple of posts, Garg), this is how he responds. He doesn't choose to start the game off by looking at things actually going on, he instead chooses to focus on **** he doesn't know about. So, hoping to get him to take something of a stance on anythiing (even if it's just the Soup wagon and why it existed), instead of taking ANY type of stance, he just responds with this:
I'm sorry but that's the grossest way to cap this off. You don't start a game by taking the most non-committal approach to a game you can find and then *****ing when someone calls you out for a stance to something going on around you. That's really bad and that's why we disliked that post so much. It's not because we expected him to have this grandiose reason for us to be doing something, it's that he dug his heels in the dirt on taking an actual stance. It reminds me a little bit of what IR did in D.Gray-Man Mafia hosted way back when, where they started the game of as scum by focusing on then-newbie Bardull instead of other thiings happening in the game.
His more recent posts are better, once he realizes he can't dodge the Soup wagon any longer and is forced to start talking about it, but his early posts are just so bad that it'd be a crime not to highlight them.
It's not just you. His words don't match his outward attitude toward the wagon.
Here's my problem with this, Soup.
You're an experienced player. You know pretty much every vote on you is BS.
Do you reaaally think that SWF Town, in a game without Ryker or Marshy, is going to pull a D1 quicklynch?
I just don't understand why YOU of all people are coming across as so panicked about this. If it was HollowNote, or one of the less experienced players, I would understand.
so at the end of the day raz comes out with a town-lean on soup; which, i think counts as a stance; before you even showed up in thread accusing himI thought we may've been on to something, Gorf, but I'm coming out of this with a town-lean on Soup after we talked him down. Slight, but it's there.
Reason being is that his concern over the wagon seems that he genuinely doesn't want to see a ML over stupid ****. He's not thinking solely out of self-preservation. If it had been the latter I'd have been more worried, and seeing where his head is at (reads-wise) after the wagon just makes me feel better about it overall.
so basically what was the point of that question? seems to me like it served no purpose and as a result there should be no reason to get ants in your pants for him not answering it
funny thing tho, where were you during rvs? nowhere to be found if i recall seems "mechanical" and "safe" and "non-commital" to me.
like yeah, skipping/missing rvs and then joining the soup wagon after progress had been made on it could be taken as "safe" and "mechanical" obv
regardless the question was pointless
your insistence that raziek was non-committal and sidelining is scummy when he got into the discussion on his own
but yeah this stuff bugs me and it's why im voting you
other players should like read this and tell me if they think im wrong on something
or why the soup wagon, i still don't see the emotional aspect of his play as scummy