Shun Goku Satsu Rake
Oriwa Rake. Kaizo ko ni oriwa naru
- Joined
- May 8, 2012
- Messages
- 3,897
Arcane inferno should post or die Imo
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
SvS isn't an option to you?Wot, I don't know. I can definitely tell he's agging Murderbrush, I don't really know if it's SvT or TvT at this point.
upon coming into the thread these were my exact sentiments lolRake should stfu or die imo
>you should go back to chacoGorf don't be a ****
And no I don't cosign any of sokrs posts, he's posting of his own accord
You should go back to Chaco tho man it really looks like you're badly distancing him the way you dropped him
Lynch this slot plz.it really looks like you're badly distancing him the way you dropped him
This vote sucked btw. Reading duri lunch, dunno how far I'll getVote: Rykerboner
Define speculative.Bardull, I could go along with. Was getting speculative of Wot already. Where's your analysis on Gorf? I'm not really liking him atm.
You're dense if you don't get what ryker is saying."3 is more votes than any townie has innately."
no way. i can go down the list of the players that have zero chance of getting the shield via anonymous plurality. nobody's gonna be dumb enough to give the shield to lylo bait.
****in **** i gotta get myself outta thread or im never gonna wake up for class
Kinda early for that.Laundry town
Slight scum lean.Define speculative.
on what planet is what Gorf did effective distancing? This just sounds like you're trying to have stated opinions in the thread, because you can't honestly think telling Gorf who he should be pushing is a valuable use of your time.Gorf don't be a ****
And no I don't cosign any of sokrs posts, he's posting of his own accord
You should go back to Chaco tho man it really looks like you're badly distancing him the way you dropped him
This is a pretty absurd accusation. What does Gorf stand to gain by not taking a firm stance on the Shield? Honestly, who gives a ****. It's not like he's sidelining an important lynch, he's stating that he can see both sides of the argument over the dumb Shield.Now he's put himself slightly behind both sides. This looks like he's trying to cover for himself to me.
Just doesn't read like SvS to me. I can see Wot actually getting frustrated in the posts so I don't see a direct connection between the two of them really. I don't like how Ryker tried to bait Wot into posting from claiming I'm skimming the page. I don't know entirely what to make of it, or Murderbush calling that out as baiting. I don't see the motive when they were already at it some.Vote KWK
SvS isn't an option to you?
The shield is a pretty powerful tool and opinions on how it should be dealt with can be telling. The way I saw it was that Gorf was getting behind murder's opinion so it would be easier to backtrack. We've already stated that some people seem a little scummy for what they want done with the shield.This is a pretty absurd accusation. What does Gorf stand to gain by not taking a firm stance on the Shield? Honestly, who gives a ****. It's not like he's sidelining an important lynch, he's stating that he can see both sides of the argument over the dumb Shield.
Iunno I think I agree with him.Kinda early for that.
We could yes, and this is also always an option as well. But then scum know where shield is headed at all times. And our BP is kind've just a "steer clear" of this target, kill someone else. Then they pick off people around the shield. I merely left it to sender/recipient full disclosure chain that way it actually has a chance of protecting someone.We've already mentioned that we can't see the pass interactions and are merely taking the sender and receiver's word for it.
Of course we can't. That's understood. What you have to understand is the risk people take if they don't follow suit. This is a big game. And what I mentioned is merely an option. (One that isn't "bulletproof" by any means, lel) But by setting our option publicly and them receiving it and NOTING they received it or did not, they are out of the range of fire until the shield is moved. Upon moving, they report who they moved it to. If the next recipient denies getting the shield/someone else claims to have gotten it/scum got hold of it they HAVE to follow cycle and report or we know something's up any of the ways.
Whether or not it is public revealed or not, WE MAKE IT public revealed. This is only an option.
Question: If we could make the shield into a cleared town slot, would you do it? And would you want it to stay on that person?
So you're suggesting do the shield move thing closer to endgame? That's dangerous because if scum gets their hands on it, they can keep it to themselves/pass it among themselves.
All game. It creates accountability to keep it moving. I don't like creating a listed order to go by or anything because scum know where it's headed then and can easily act around it. By allowing the confirmed recipient his choice, scum don't know where it's headed and have to worry about going around a constantly moving shield for their kills. I think this would take the WIFOM out of the shield passing, and give us a bit of ease of mind knowing it's constantly moving. BP is powerful. No one denies that. But this, I think, is a good option of how to move it in our favor, and it takes away some of the threat of BP getting away.
Problems with this:
There is always a chance Scum get the shield.
If people do not agree with full disclosure and allow it to drift out of public info.
If a flipped scum has had the shield, it opens up new WIFOM of what they'd do with the shield pass. Town or to scum.
By no means, I don't think anything we can do here is perfect. But, what you mention next might be the best option.
Is this suggesting we vote each day who gets the shield? I missed this one initially actually. I like that better. But we're still placing our trust in the sender and recipient. And if the recipient is scum, that can screw us over.
Why?Iunno I think I agree with him.
I agree with this. But it's entirely out of place still.It sounds like a scum power tho, so I doubt anyone is gonna come forward at any point. Keep an eye out for someone with an itchy trigger finger.
eating chocolate CAN make you fat. im not gonna stop eating chocolate though just cuz i risk my weight.@Gorf: Lol, why anonymous then? If it's obvious why would you go against orchestrating a vote it if that's common knowledge? I just fail to see the point if you understand that