FirestormNeos
Smash Lord
Consider the following phrase:
"I think you should shut up."
We can confirm it is speech because it is being said/written/typed by one person to another.
However, at the same time, it suggests the other person stops talking, essentially infringing on that person's Freedom of Speech, especially of the person saying it is in a position of [social/political/fiscal/parental] power over the person being told to shut up.
That's a problem. I want to discuss ways to fix this paradox in a polite and well-thoughtout manner.
"I think you should shut up."
We can confirm it is speech because it is being said/written/typed by one person to another.
However, at the same time, it suggests the other person stops talking, essentially infringing on that person's Freedom of Speech, especially of the person saying it is in a position of [social/political/fiscal/parental] power over the person being told to shut up.
That's a problem. I want to discuss ways to fix this paradox in a polite and well-thoughtout manner.