Recent content by Priap0s

No idea. It's not like its something genious, its a very simple pun/word play that 4(sry, lame) sure has been done many times before! But then we got Sakurai saying he consideres the games different enough that he sees them as number 4 and 5 in the series. So that kinda points towards it not...

It's the fourth game in the series. Smash 4 WiiU. Smash 4 3DS. Smash for WiiU. Smash for 3DS. Smash four WiiU. Smash four 3DS. 4 / four / for :)

Thought so, thanks for quick answer mate. Tuesday will be a good day for Nintendo fans; The main Nintendo E3 events, The Smash Q&A AND the Smash bros invitational all the same night. Oh lord, this gon be good! Edit: Oh and yes. I have moved on from watching Microsofts presentations...

Is the countdown set for when the first Nintendo event starts or for when E3 as a whole starts? :)

I wish Sakurai would Yeah this post AND leave a comment on it. It seems like such a Sakurai thing to do :)

Thank you, well written. I'm on board now! I wonder, do most of us in here even care if L-cancel is manual or automatic? I mean, I figure most of us that hang around here have it in our muscle memory and do it without difficulty. Even if it was automatic I'd probably still be pressing the...

Got ya! I still don't realy see how it concerns the discussion of L-canceling at all. Do you mean that L-cancel should not be questioned as a needless barrier just because there are other barriers that are even harder to overcome? I think the tradeof complexity vs added depth is the most...

Yes it sure is! It is possible to be good at the game without some of the things I mentioned as well. I still have to admit that I don't get what point you are trying to make? Or in what context your first comment was relevant to the discussion.

Yup. Wavedashing, Dashdancing, DI, SDI, crouchcanceling, ledgecanceling and alot of other things aswell. They are different options and add strategic depth though. So your point is?

I agree. Alot of people say "oh well, casuals don't even know or care about it", but I have mates that are among those so called 'casuals'. I'm sure alot of people, like me, have friends that play casually only. They are not bothered finding out about L-canceling, practising/learning it or...

Every post you do you are on the offense and attack the one you respond to. Can you come with something concrete instead of just claiming things and bash on others? This isn't facebook or whatever. No one is dumb enough to not see through the Bill O'Riley arguing techniques here. I asked you...

Ehm, I said I can't see how it affects that situation and asked you to explain further. I also said I thought keeping L-cancel in for such rare events only is bad game design and is just needles complexity for what it offers. Where the hell did you get the "You ignore examples and dismiss...

Hard to argue about it then when no examples can be put forth. I actually don't think it would be advantageous in many aspects at all. When do you mean that you are opting to NOT L-cancel? Sure, some people argue about mindgames and such. But tbh I always found that argument pretty lacking. I...

GC remake = 25 bucks + a wiimote.* But wiimotes are pretty cheap nowdays I assume? So about 40$-45$ for both maybe?

What? I don't see how automatic L-cancel wouldn't work there anyways? (I never play Link so go easy on me). Still, even if so, having L-canceling manually because of one or a very few certain scenarios is silly. Then rather redesign Links D-air accordingly, I'm sure there is another way to solve...