(oh snap, just pressing quote automatically adds the quote to your current draft... sex)
how does voting J do more than having voted Gheb? because J had someone else voting him? they were both votes without reasoning behind them, it'd be silly as **** for J to feel pressured do to WOTT's additional vote.
WOTT's reasoning in #42! certainly doesn't explain ****... so i'm confused why you're suspecting NL with the premise that he didn't acknowledge WOTT's pointless reasoning. also i though WOTT's vote was odd af too so I'm not following how NL seems like he's discrediting WOTT / how NL seems scummy from that
this doesn't make any senseSimply put, I think you are trying to sling mud onto WATT for a weak reason. You don't really have much reason to discredit him from joining your push, and it seems you are trying to force one. To me, him joining you on J would be better since nothing was happening with his Gheb vote. You also say him bringing up Mac/Gheb makes no sense when it does, and especially when he gives the reasoning and you don't even acknowledge it. It would be understandable if he had reasons to hold him back yet he still went on with voting J, but there was none strong enough. (Since his vote was RVS) You also have stated that it was weird that he moved on to J while having stated that Gheb OMGUSED him. Do you think an OMGUS is good enough to stay on a vote when a seperate wagon is forming up for pressure?
Vote: No Lynch
how does voting J do more than having voted Gheb? because J had someone else voting him? they were both votes without reasoning behind them, it'd be silly as **** for J to feel pressured do to WOTT's additional vote.
WOTT's reasoning in #42! certainly doesn't explain ****... so i'm confused why you're suspecting NL with the premise that he didn't acknowledge WOTT's pointless reasoning. also i though WOTT's vote was odd af too so I'm not following how NL seems like he's discrediting WOTT / how NL seems scummy from that