1: M2K=meta
2: Dojo=meta
3: DSF= meta/snake/wario
4: Lee Martin=lucario/meta
5: Tyrant=meta
5: Co18=ddd
7: Domo=meta
7: Melee1=ic/meta
I'm probably never going to get into the Back Room in my natural born life, so I might as well drag the conflict to grounds where it can be discussed. Apparently the issue that I see people having, is banning MK due to the evidence shown above. The top placings were taken by MK. And now, HOBO is Banning MK at their next tournament. Whether you want MK banned or not, please consider the following.
Is it probable, nay possible, that MK is not only an excellent character, but the most developed? Our most capable minds from Melee have transitioned to MK, and are further progressing his game play to limits far beyond the characters below him. In comparison, the amount of people who are capable of furthering any particular metagame, the number is very small. For you visual learners, If every character was racing on a track of development, MK is lapping everybody by three laps. It's because of this that MK is far advanced. It's not just the characters base advantages that are brought to the table, it's the creative thinkers that are progressing MK's Metagame.
Additionally, I feel that the tournament of WHOBO, and any Regional in that respect should really be analyzed as more than just character placings. You have to think about who was there. I think it goes without saying, that the five best MKs in the United States would go as follows, (This is in no particular order.)
M2K
Tyrant
DSF
Spam
Dojo
Four out of Five of them were there at WHOBO. Their skill far exceeds that of their competitors. It's no wonder that you are going to see MK at the top placings. That's usually what happens when you bring together the Best players from around the United States, they place on top. The reason that this is important, is to note that it was just a coincidence that they all play MK. In California, we have Many players who are capable of beating these people without the Aid of MK. (Again, in no particular order)
DEHF - Falco
Fiction - Wario
Teba - DDD
LeePuff -GaW
Listed above are just a few of California's Capable players, and when I say capable, I mean National tournament Viable. A threat, so to speak. Some might say that the Former is the best in California. But I digress, and that is a different debate. Back on topic, we can clearly see that MK can be beaten, and there are a variety of characters that can do the job. Basing ones opinion to ban MK due to the results of WHOBO is basing an opinion of bias, coincidental, and therefore, invalid results.
Finally, and I feel this bears repeating, we are attacking one character and we fail to shed a helping hand to the characters below MK. My example that I'd like to offer is a story of HugS. HugS played Samus in Melee, and as everybody knows, is absolutely amazing. He didn't pick up brawl immediately, where as I picked it up the day it came out. HugS decided to play Brawl seriously, and therefore decided to pick up ROB. My Peach, has beaten some of the best ROBs in the United States, in money matches, and in tournament.
ShadowROB
Hitori
t0mmy
This was not to brag about my abilities, or boast about those victories, but rather to illuminate this next point. HugS is very smart, and has been a beacon of intelligence in Melee and in Brawl, from helpful advice to jaw-dropping rhetoric. With his knowledge of the game, and just in general, HugS picked up ROB, and furthered ROB's metagame. To this day, I've yet to beat HugS in tournament, I've played him twice. His ROB exceeds the ROB's in the nation as far as I'm concerned. Well, beyond the fact that I'm meat-riding HugS, this paragraph proves a point. It takes a smart mind to further a character. HugS had that potential, so he Did it. And now ROB in a whole is just a better character.
And then what next? Though it sounds farfetched now, we might be thinking differently. MK does keep some characters in check. Without him, Falcos will run rampant. Think about it. Does your Non MK main beat Falco to it's entirety? Soon we will be singling out other characters who make top eight. When those top placings are infested with another character, will we then be having a discussion to ban him/her?
In conclusion, This tournament's results were biased and inconclusive. It's not fair to base such a rash judgment on one tournament like this. And even if others were taken into account, bias knows no discrimination. If anything, Genesis would have been a better choice tournament to base opinions off of. Metagames are still incomplete, and therefore I believe that it's fruitless to make a bann without taking these things into consideration.
Thanks for reading,
Sky`
2: Dojo=meta
3: DSF= meta/snake/wario
4: Lee Martin=lucario/meta
5: Tyrant=meta
5: Co18=ddd
7: Domo=meta
7: Melee1=ic/meta
I'm probably never going to get into the Back Room in my natural born life, so I might as well drag the conflict to grounds where it can be discussed. Apparently the issue that I see people having, is banning MK due to the evidence shown above. The top placings were taken by MK. And now, HOBO is Banning MK at their next tournament. Whether you want MK banned or not, please consider the following.
Is it probable, nay possible, that MK is not only an excellent character, but the most developed? Our most capable minds from Melee have transitioned to MK, and are further progressing his game play to limits far beyond the characters below him. In comparison, the amount of people who are capable of furthering any particular metagame, the number is very small. For you visual learners, If every character was racing on a track of development, MK is lapping everybody by three laps. It's because of this that MK is far advanced. It's not just the characters base advantages that are brought to the table, it's the creative thinkers that are progressing MK's Metagame.
Additionally, I feel that the tournament of WHOBO, and any Regional in that respect should really be analyzed as more than just character placings. You have to think about who was there. I think it goes without saying, that the five best MKs in the United States would go as follows, (This is in no particular order.)
M2K
Tyrant
DSF
Spam
Dojo
Four out of Five of them were there at WHOBO. Their skill far exceeds that of their competitors. It's no wonder that you are going to see MK at the top placings. That's usually what happens when you bring together the Best players from around the United States, they place on top. The reason that this is important, is to note that it was just a coincidence that they all play MK. In California, we have Many players who are capable of beating these people without the Aid of MK. (Again, in no particular order)
DEHF - Falco
Fiction - Wario
Teba - DDD
LeePuff -GaW
Listed above are just a few of California's Capable players, and when I say capable, I mean National tournament Viable. A threat, so to speak. Some might say that the Former is the best in California. But I digress, and that is a different debate. Back on topic, we can clearly see that MK can be beaten, and there are a variety of characters that can do the job. Basing ones opinion to ban MK due to the results of WHOBO is basing an opinion of bias, coincidental, and therefore, invalid results.
Finally, and I feel this bears repeating, we are attacking one character and we fail to shed a helping hand to the characters below MK. My example that I'd like to offer is a story of HugS. HugS played Samus in Melee, and as everybody knows, is absolutely amazing. He didn't pick up brawl immediately, where as I picked it up the day it came out. HugS decided to play Brawl seriously, and therefore decided to pick up ROB. My Peach, has beaten some of the best ROBs in the United States, in money matches, and in tournament.
ShadowROB
Hitori
t0mmy
This was not to brag about my abilities, or boast about those victories, but rather to illuminate this next point. HugS is very smart, and has been a beacon of intelligence in Melee and in Brawl, from helpful advice to jaw-dropping rhetoric. With his knowledge of the game, and just in general, HugS picked up ROB, and furthered ROB's metagame. To this day, I've yet to beat HugS in tournament, I've played him twice. His ROB exceeds the ROB's in the nation as far as I'm concerned. Well, beyond the fact that I'm meat-riding HugS, this paragraph proves a point. It takes a smart mind to further a character. HugS had that potential, so he Did it. And now ROB in a whole is just a better character.
And then what next? Though it sounds farfetched now, we might be thinking differently. MK does keep some characters in check. Without him, Falcos will run rampant. Think about it. Does your Non MK main beat Falco to it's entirety? Soon we will be singling out other characters who make top eight. When those top placings are infested with another character, will we then be having a discussion to ban him/her?
In conclusion, This tournament's results were biased and inconclusive. It's not fair to base such a rash judgment on one tournament like this. And even if others were taken into account, bias knows no discrimination. If anything, Genesis would have been a better choice tournament to base opinions off of. Metagames are still incomplete, and therefore I believe that it's fruitless to make a bann without taking these things into consideration.
Thanks for reading,
Sky`