Arcadenik
Smash Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
- Messages
- 14,152
- NNID
- Arcadenik
Hmm... how about bazookas?Pretty sure he was referring to any firearms.
Firearms = no go
Explosives (i.e. RPGs, mortars, grenade launchers) = acceptable
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Hmm... how about bazookas?Pretty sure he was referring to any firearms.
Firearms = no go
Explosives (i.e. RPGs, mortars, grenade launchers) = acceptable
Bazookas use explosives.Hmm... how about bazookas?
It's a rocket launcher, so it's an explosive weapon rather than a firearm.Hmm... how about bazookas?
Fixed.nobody's brought up Pikmin 3, AKA The Best Game On Wii U. For shame.
As amazing as it is, people are a tad discouraged.People are talking about series that need playable representation and nobody's brought up The Wonderful 101, AKA The Best Game On Wii U. For shame.
Never said it did.Also, bad sales =/= bad game, otherwise we wouldn't have the w101 trophies at all.
I wasn't really trying to Bomb anyone, just saying that bad sales is a dumb excuse to keep a character out of Smash.Never said it did.
I think you misunderstood my point.
Eh. That's yet to be seen.I wasn't really trying to Bomb anyone, just saying that bad sales is a dumb excuse to keep a character out of Smash.
Yes. Platinum Games.Bayonetta and W101 come from the same developer, correct?
Ah, I was going to bring up an old Bayo argument but I didn't know the party of W101Eh. That's yet to be seen.
Apparently, Shulk barely made it in...
Yes. Platinum Games.
Though Wonderful 101 is owned by Nintendo.
People said that about Shulk, too.I'd be okay with W101 representation, but my only concern is the possible reactions from the people who still think it's third party.
Sales being an issue and ROB do not match. ROB saved the gaming industry by being bought by consumers.People said that about Shulk, too.
Also, on the topic of bad sales having an effect: Ness. Shulk. ROB.
Where'd you hear that?Apparently, Shulk barely made it in...
True.ROB saved the American gaming industry by getting the NES onto shelves... and within a few months, NES systems without the accessory were selling better than those with it. Also, nobody gave a **** about it in Japan and Europe because their gaming industries were doing fine while America was just totally ****ting the bed.
Fair enough. Ness and Shulk still stand, though - and much like with Mother and Xenoblade, The Wonderful 101 is noted for the fact that, despite poor sales, virtually everyone that's played the game loves it. Seriously, even including Smash, it's probably my favorite game on the system.True.
Though I think R.O.B. opening the gate makes him more of a special case, sales really shouldn't be taken to heart when it comes to discussing him.
Shulk's Miiverse quote states that characters like him don't happen very often and kind of implies that Shulk got lucky.Where'd you hear that?
I took that more from the gameplay perspective rather than the actual character. But I suppose he could have meant it by the other way around.Shulk's Miiverse quote states that characters like him don't happen very often and kind of implies that Shulk got lucky.
I took it as a character perspective as Shulk really is kind of an odd compared to every other choice.I took that more from the gameplay perspective rather than the actual character. But I suppose he could have meant it by the other way around.
He's the closest we'd get to Viewtiful Joe in design, at least. He'd still be just as flashy and crazy to play as.As amazing as it is, people are a tad discouraged.
It bombed.
Incredibly badly.
Still, he'd be so sick.
I recall seeing that line; I felt that it's a little open to interpretation, as it could be based upon the character's playstyle, or his general character background. Or both.Shulk's Miiverse quote states that characters like him don't happen very often and kind of implies that Shulk got lucky.
Yea that line was very vague. Did he mean the way Shulk works with all the Monado arts, or his one shot wonder status getting in the game after one game. Sure he is getting a franchise but he won't feature in the next games kind of like how Final Fantasy works. Or just another "sword-user" from another "RPG". Who knows? We will probably never get a clarification on that.Shulk's Miiverse quote states that characters like him don't happen very often and kind of implies that Shulk got lucky.
Depends if they even worked on viewtful joe, if he wasn't worked on there would be no moves to port.I thought I heard somewhere that Viewtiful Joe was planned as the Capcom rep at one point? If so, they could easily port over some of his normals to Wonder-Red.
I love wonderful 101, it is my favortie wii u game. Shame on Nintendo for not advertising it.I'd be okay with W101 representation, but my only concern is the possible reactions from the people who still think it's third party.
Also, bad sales =/= bad game, otherwise we wouldn't have the w101 trophies at all.
That's what I got from it.I took that more from the gameplay perspective rather than the actual character. But I suppose he could have meant it by the other way around.
Definitely seems more referring to his gameplay than who he is in general.He's not the type of character that would usually appear in the Smash Bros. series, but we worked really hard to make it happen. We're very happy with how he turned out.
I would love to see him back, but at the same time I highly doubt it.Have we talked about Snake already? Gosh darn it.
So, what's the public opinion on his return?
Or it could be the genre he's from, he's the only JRPG addition in Smash Bros. so far.He's the closest we'd get to Viewtiful Joe in design, at least. He'd still be just as flashy and crazy to play as.
I recall seeing that line; I felt that it's a little open to interpretation, as it could be based upon the character's playstyle, or his general character background. Or both.
Alright, but what is the overall opinion of the character from the user's perspective? I understand you're skeptical, but I'd like a more general opinion.I would love to see him back, but at the same time I highly doubt it.
If Snake gets important to Nintendo in the next five years or so, which is a really big if as it looks now, I think maybe he'll come back next title, but that Grenade Launcher has got to go.Alright, but what is the overall opinion of the character from the user's perspective? I understand you're skeptical, but I'd like a more general opinion.
?Or it could be the genre he's from; he's the only JRPG addition in Smash Bros. so far.
They are from strategy RPGs are they not, the gameplay of FE speaks for itself.
Have we talked about Snake already? Gosh darn it.
So, what's the public opinion on his return?
Snake's importance to Nintendo never got him into Brawl and it means jack here. Why do people keep using this poor excuse? Sakurai went out of his way to add him once, and it had nothing to do with Nintendo. He'll come back if Sakurai wants to add him.If Snake gets important to Nintendo in the next five years or so.
First: I admit I've never played Fire Emblem.They are from strategy RPGs are they not, the gameplay of FE speaks for itself.
You could at least tell me on what I should research.Yeah, you should probably do research first.