Alright, cool. I'll wait till the end of the game to ask what exactly you don't like about it; J said I should wait to ask for critique, and I suppose that's included.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
How do I do that?@Lore you can save the quotes from the previous page if you save your draft before going to the next page.
I have absolutely nothing in my reply box, just a big empty box.
I honestly don't have any of that, lol.![]()
Just type, click the floppy, click save draft
... But you aren't the only one doing any work, and most of the work you've done has been useless.Sure. I would at least like you each to give 2-3 reads that you have yet to release, or change in reads. Unless that is too much to ask. I can't be doing all the work in this town.
ObviouslyMan.
I'm not finished catching up yet, but Mac and ilovegiraffes are OBVIOUSLY buddies this game.
Expand on thisreasoning on the weird interactions Mac and Giraffe keep having.
Expand on this
1-thats a null tell from rake and comparatively to zombies me posting this much with a no ****s barred attitude should actually be taken as a town tellThis is going no where. This is my other lead besides Werekill, yet my read on WK is weakening into 'Dumb or Scum'. More so the former.
Unvote Vote: Full Metal Lynch
1.These guys have been flooding the thread with useless filler.
2.They have been trying to make me look bad, instead of looking for scum.
3. Their vote currently is on Scary, and not even as a scum reason. (As you heard rake say 'you're bad if you think I seriously think scary is scum')
4. The only other thing they have been doing is trying to get Werekill to be more aggressive.
5.They give me the same vibe from Fire Emblem, where they kick up alot of dirt and flood the thread
Here's the first post that makes me feel iffy. Every single bit of reasoning in this post is either mediocre or a flat out lie, especially the last paragraph. It's hardly a reason to vote for me and attempt to start a little wagon, but why did he make this attempt at a case with such crappy reasoning?Faking content.
Why haven't you asked about Mac's/Gorf's/Gheb's reasoning then? Why focus on Jerkus?
Wishy washy and afraid to vote.
Since BardulL has been voted, he has been saying that BardulL's post was weird. Yet he never asked him directly about it at first. Only I did. What came out was "lol rvs" and Werekill stating that it didn't seem like rvs to keep himself on BardulL. Yet he never even voted him. He is wishy washy. He also tells Jerkus that not presenting reasoning is a no no but didn't say that to Macman/Gorf/Gheb. You can see that he isn't really taking that to heart, and only saying it to say it because you talked about critical thinking. He is faking content to seem town, and trying to misrepresent BardulL when there is little reason to.
Vote: Werekill
"I asked it first so anyone pushing harder on someone to answer it is faking content."@Lore :
1. You were asking a question I already asked. You never asked it at first. Therefore, you were faking content. If you have agreed with my question initially, then you may have had points to your favor. Yet your first post was vague.
2. You never cared to ask Jerkus at first either (you had plenty of time to ask), you only said so to seem town because Zen reminded you by asking Jerkus for the reasoning. Why were you actively focused on Jerkus/Zen and not Macman/Gorf/Gheb?
3. He only had 3 votes on him by the time you entered. One more wouldn't have hurt, and this isn't a newbie game. Players know what to do when their wagon is at full steam. This is not a good excuse for you not to vote. Your excuse also doesn't excuse you from giving a concrete stance on BardulL. (From "I guess he might be scum" to "I think he is scum")
4. Refer to point 1. You specifically said his post was weird, not that he should have explained why he was voting Zen. So this shows you didn't know what was weird, you were just going along with it because he seemed to be a popular candidate. You then asked this to add onto your 'that's a weird post bardull' assertion. You should have been more specific originally.
Says the guy voting scary for lol reasons. Yo are you going to actually explain that? Who else is scum?
Hooooooo boy. First he accuses them of filling the thread with filler (which I'll get to in a moment), but then he flat out accuses them of not looking for scum at all. Apparently going against a wagon and asking for specific reads is kicking up dirt. And that's not even mentioning how apparently "make[ing] me look bad" is a scum tell; apparently Giraffe is a paragon of towny virtue and is immune to criticism!This is going no where. This is my other lead besides Werekill, yet my read on WK is weakening into 'Dumb or Scum'. More so the former.
Unvote Vote: Full Metal Lynch
These guys have been flooding the thread with useless filler. They have been trying to make me look bad, instead of looking for scum. Their vote currently is on Scary, and not even as a scum reason. (As you heard rake say 'you're bad if you think I seriously think scary is scum') The only other thing they have been doing is trying to get Werekill to be more aggressive. They give me the same vibe from Fire Emblem, where they kick up alot of dirt and flood the thread.
@Xivii : You were scum with FML. Is there a similar play here to that of Fire Emblem in your own opinion?
@#HBC | Scary : Vote this guy with me. He's even voting you, and doesn't even think you are scum. Ain't that a bit telling?
@Lore : If you top pick is Macman, why aren't you voting him?
@#HBC | Mac : Yo why haven't you answered my q. Read on Bardull?
Hey. Get your vote on my WK wagon. It has cake.![]()
Zen you should vote WK with me, actually. You down?