And apologies, I like to write a lot.
Don't worry, I like to write a lot too.
So here we go again, let's see if I make it to 10 again, without cheating this time )who am I kidding, I'll totally cheat):
1) He changed the name of his video. It was originally called "The Hypest Moment in BEAST 6". He changed it because he got called out.
Read from this post onwards and you'll see.
2) Click bait is annoying, that is all. And again, it all comes fromt he history these boards have with Izaw, a history most newbies are unaware of. Imagine if a guy who was a jerk to you shows up 3 years later, still being a jerk. You call him out and some guys who don't know him, but who want him to like them because he seems like a cool guy, jump at you and fight to see who defends him the hardest. Same thing.
3) You really missed the point of the video again. Go read points 7 and 8 again.
4) What you said about people going and losing and considering their loyalties does not work like that. We've seen it in Brawl, we don't want to see it again.
5) I never said he's beneath me, though he might actually be IRL. I'm quite tall.
6) I don't have a need to belittle and harrass him. I call him out for his flaws, same as I do with everyone else. However, he seems to be above that according to some people (who're all really bad at logic).
7) This point is just a filler. Move along.
8) We care about the ability of someone to present false data A LOT because misinformation killed Link's jab game this time around. People talking about crap they don't know enough about, and hyping up something that was really not that big of a deal actually hurt Link's chances in the game. We didn't need that, and nobody else received that nerf (Fox, Ryu, D3, etc). Want ot know why? Because nobody made such a huge deal about it as it was made about Link. Therefore, the devs saw that they just HAD to nerf Link because he's so high tier he's clearly broken and we got hit with the dumbest nerf bat they had.
9) Really, go read points 7 and 8 again.
10) Now, for a practical illustration of points 7 and 8 of my previous post, reread this post's point 8.