#HBC | Nabe
Beneath it all, he had H-cups all along
Sure. Any means.Mod: Can we help people find replacements in any way, and if so, how?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Sure. Any means.Mod: Can we help people find replacements in any way, and if so, how?
This game just keeps devolving and devolving. Like I literally have nothing to say because I'm just staring at this game, shaking my head at a lot of things.
Laundry please quote this because I'm on my phone/it's 3am and can't switch accounts atm.
Kantrip turning super aggro/moody pants. He is continuing to tell at soup and now I am getting a little bored of it especially because he isn't adding anything to soupScum idea besides just bickering with him. I want to see him respond to Soup instead of just say "**** you!" to him for the countless time. I moreso want to see this because Soup's a pretty strong town read of our slot for reasons Laundry has said but if not I can paraphrase. Basically soup is obnoxious this game but got off on the wrong foot and is still town due to his motives behind his actions.
Wott, you asked about SvT or TvT. To be honest, I have felt more TvT but Laundry has liked more SvT (Kanty as the scum) and I am starting to see why more and more. Laundry told me that Kanty has been digging his heels into the ground about a lot of things and now I can see what he means about his soup push. It lacks anything new and lately he is just saying it to say it. Now because we have decided that we like Kanty less and don't trust him (we didn't label him as scum) he comes in and changes his mind based on that premise and we haven't been adding new things? I'm sorry but that's just wrong cuz I know for a fact Laundry has been posting in this game whenever there is new stuff because he drags me to talk with him while he posting. Kanty's flip on our slot is bad to look at just off his premise and now he seems to be playing more like "how do I make myself look townie enough to not be suspected" which makes me more willing to side with my other half on the fact he's more likely to be scum then a lot of the cast.
Some other reads while I'm here; Gheb is quite truly the epitome of dumb or scum this game. His readslist is a great example of this where he feels Kanty/Soup are scum together with our slot and another slot I can't recall. I can see townGheb just playing bad as per usual or he could be scum this game. It's a 50:50 but meh. Also Gheb from what I can recall has been more of an armchair critic this game instead of hunting scum. Don't know if bad or scum so that's for a later date for me.
Joker/Wott are strong as **** town. If anyone questions that, tell Laundry to yell at me to get in here. Soup/Fab are pretty damn town too. Pawn is really easy newbie townie....are people not seeing this yet?
Oh, scum-read on Rake and his "big" post was very lack luster. I believe even the quotes had more to say then he did and it really doesn't feel like townRake trying to help town but moreso responding because it's an obligation.
Just re-read a bit more, Kantrips antagonistic attitude towards WoTT based on him trying to get amswers makes me more and more curious about his slot and makes me want to say having the tourney cop watch his match would be good.
If I were in Joker's spot, I would definitely be looking more at the question marks to figure out what may be happening behind the scenes. That's why people like Gheb/Kanty would make a decent pick.
As Laundry said though, we are waiting for matches to finish so we may evaluate them and get more info. The matches should have good info that we can generate more discussion around but lately nothing really new and fresh has been in the thread. Our slot has been one of the front runners for discussion and we are more than comfortable to sit back an analyze other people talk more now.
Nulls like TTK, Shoco, whoever replaces Ryker, Gheb putting some weight into his words, and some more...what's the word.....substantial? things from Kantrip would be good to see.
Anyways I'm out for now, but that's where my head is at. I'm pretty sure this isnt too long since I'm on a phone but if it is ugh. Night peoples.
Gheb, it's in the rules that scum knows each other but just can't communicate iirc. So that would throw out that side of your argument if so.
Also, dude, there are four scum, you labeled four people and didnt explain yourself. You cannot honestly blame them for thinking you had them as scum together because that would just be obtuse.
Elaborate on ShocoScum, that's a new thing that's not #trending at the moment since you are the first to bring it up. Everyone else has them as null, what are you seeing differently?
I'm gonna agree with the majority of thoughts at the current time and ask you to elaborate also on Soup/Kanty both being scum.
Kantrip still not responding to Soup: Irritation rising
Gheb not knowing this posted in the OP: please read
J busy status: extremely
Yet why am I still caught up and posting but not others? What excuses?
*phone post, <3 Laundry*
This game just keeps devolving and devolving. Like I literally have nothing to say because I'm just staring at this game, shaking my head at a lot of things.
I finished my match. pawn beat me every time, never even won a round.
It was really scummy how Shoco refused to dig for **** but then when threatened with removal actually did it.
What kind of stuff are we sharing? Like do we want to publicly out what colours we and our opponents have access to? I don't know what else I want to reveal publicly. We both chose our main round 1 and he beat me, we both chose our counterpick round 2 and he beat me twice in a row. That made the set.Elaborate on it.
Do you think Pawn beat you because he cheated, or because he's scum? This is what I want you to elaborate on.
Because it's much more relevant than what is being said right now and now that matches are being played there should be something to be said about them. I personally find it fishy and I'm considering how I'm reading Kantrip right now because I believ(ed) that scum would more than likely take the win against a townie unless they cheated. I don't think I'm going to get an answer from Pawn stating if he cheated or not.
Here I think you are trying to make it seem fishy. Kantrip came in saying that he lost every time, but he never gave a suspicion that pawn may have cheated. You picked up on the "He won every time" bit and asked him to elaborate. You thought it was him cheating from only kantrip saying he won everytime, and you just reacted by asking him to elaborate. I mean, the thing is you expected Kantrip to be thinking that Pawn just won through being suspicious or cheating, and not due to being legit. You never considered that.Elaborate on it.
I finished my match. pawn beat me every time, never even won a round.
Because it's much more relevant than what is being said right now [...]
Deadline! ~72 hours left in Match phase.
What the **** are you smoking? Are you saying that there is no room to talk about this when I'm pretty certain that matches and the mechanics around it will become considerably more important as the game progresses? This whole post is ********, and let me tell you why. You jump to a conclusion about one thing I said instead of looking at the big picture of things. Look at my post again, and look at what I'm trying to point out. I think mafia is more likely to win a match and do you see where the problem is here? My scum-read, Kantrip, did not win a single match. This goes against what I've been thinking and I want to know more about this. Have you ever considered, that possibly, I stated all this because I want a certain someone to look into it also? Pawn isn't going to answer me because nobody is going to outright state that they cheated after a match, regardless of alignment. You're blatantly wrong about your assumption, and it frustrates me to see you go on about this like you know what you're talking about.No, it isn't relevant. I think you are bull****ting. The underline shows you saying you find 'it' fishy, but there is no 'it' to be fishy about. You saying that you THINK pawn won't answer doesn't mean he won't because he's scum. Again, there is no way for you to know if he cheated or not, and there is no reason to be suspicious of him cheating without knowing what really happened.
You are also taking how you THINK mafia would play to fit into your 'fishy' suspicion. You aren't considering that town would cheat also, or simply 'take the win'. I find it odd that you haven't considered it as null.
Here I think you are trying to make it seem fishy. Kantrip came in saying that he lost every time, but he never gave a suspicion that pawn may have cheated. You picked up on the "He won every time" bit and asked him to elaborate. You thought it was him cheating from only kantrip saying he won everytime, and you just reacted by asking him to elaborate. I mean, the thing is you expected Kantrip to be thinking that Pawn just won through being suspicious or cheating, and not due to being legit. You never considered that.
I just found it slightly opportunistic. Seeing your elaboration doesn't relieve my concern.
That's straight up not true.
![]()
Very well, PP / Shoco are borderline confirmed scum, you're looking good to go as well. Just gotta see how the whole thing with Kantrip losing his set is turning out.
![]()
I think mafia is more likely to win a match and do you see where the problem is here? My scum-read, Kantrip, did not win a single match. This goes against what I've been thinking and I want to know more about this.
You never clarified what you had a fishy feeling about (underlined). I assumed Pawn. I asked you to clarify but you didn't. So please do.Because it's much more relevant than what is being said right now and now that matches are being played there should be something to be said about them. I personally find it fishy and I'm considering how I'm reading Kantrip right now because I believ(ed) that scum would more than likely take the win against a townie unless they cheated. I don't think I'm going to get an answer from Pawn stating if he cheated or not.