• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

I feel now is a good time to make a statment about clones and their function in Smash

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
1,448
With Lucina showing up I'm seeing a lot of comments along the lines of "another lazy clone added to the roster" and "why can't we just have more unique characters in the game?" As someone who used to feel that exact same way I would like to share some perspective that helped me see clones in a different light, as well as share some facts that, while common for Smash fans and fighting game fans in general, might be new to people just now getting into the games. These are:


Clones are added to pad and strengthen the roster:
While the roster is decided before the game begins development and some clones may be planned at that point, a good parentage of them are added after the initial roster is finished. The thought process behind clones is this: "the intended characters are basically finished, but maybe we can make another one using 'this' characters assets. Let's see who could work with this character build/moveset." Of course, I imagine it is slightly more organized then that. They probably have a list of characters they are going to make, and then a list of characters they can use as clones if there's time. My point is no one in the Smash team decides to make clones out of simple laziness, in fact it's usually the opposite. They want to add as many fan favorite characters as possible to the game, and they assume most fans will enjoy seeing their favorite characters. Even if those characters are similar to pre-existing fighters.


The addition of clones in no way effects how many unique characters we have:
Clones take up some development time, but they take up far less time then a brand new character. New characters don't just have to be made from scratch; they have to be balanced as well. Designing a character isn't as simple as simply making a model, giving it moves, and calling it a day. What if your teams initial idea for a moveset doesn't work? What if the moveset is unbalanced? What if the game can't handle a design you had in mind? These are very real problems a fresh new character brings to the table. Problems that can pop up at any point when adding the character to the roster. A clone eliminates these problems entirely. You know the moveset works, so giving it to another character makes sense. A few alterations to speed and power gives the clone spice without forcing the team to head back to the drawing board and start over. Since these characters take far less time to make thinking they are some how holding back a unique character simply isn't true. There is no way they could design and implement a new character in the time it takes them to make a few clones.

Characters (even clones) are finished long before we see them:
A common complaint is that since we see a clone at a certain point we assume that the team scampered to make them at the last minute. While you could say this is the case from a development perspective, this is far from true. They aren't going to add a character a few weeks before a game goes gold. Even the most bare bone clones were added months ago. The fact that most clones are secret gives us this impression that they were somehow added "very late." Toon Link and Lucina have been finished for months, when we see them has nothing to do with when they were made. I say all this to say that even though they're developed using "other parts" they aren't half-ass Frankenstein monsters added on a whim. Someone worked hard so we can have them. I'm not saying this to pop your mouth and tell you to "be grateful," but understand that a "lazy clone" is anything but.






I understand your frustration when it comes to clones initially. There is nothing more disappointing to see your favorite character...only to have him play like someone else. Lamenting over wasted potential is fair; a lot of potentially unique characters have "succumbed" to the "cloning." But try to look at it from a development perspective. They took the time to add as many characters to the roster as they could and they did it with fans in mind. Clones are specifically there to make us happy and give us characters we otherwise couldn't get.
 
Last edited:

Headcrab Jackalope

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
855
Location
Kalimdor
NNID
Jackalope1313
3DS FC
0791-2751-5749
Switch FC
SW-2418-1451-4036
Hm. You make good points. However, the main reason I like clones is that they let you play as less popular characters, but just with a similar move set. I really like Pichu for example, so being able to play as him in Melee despite him being terrible and a clone is great. Lucina is another character I supported, and despite being a clone(maybe), I will definitely enjoy playing as her, just because I like her as a character, rather than a fighter.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
1,448
Hm. You make good points. However, the main reason I like clones is that they let you play as less popular characters, but just with a similar move set. I really like Pichu for example, so being able to play as him in Melee despite him being terrible and a clone is great. Lucina is another character I supported, and despite being a clone(maybe), I will definitely enjoy playing as her, just because I like her as a character, rather than a fighter.
The other perks clones bring to the table are great. I agree with you, playing as characters we otherwise wouldn't get is a nice bonus. Another big plus to clones is that you can see what some character would be like with different speeds and strengths. A slower Mario or a faster Pikachu. The worst clone as far as potential goes is actually the best example: Ganondorf. He's a slower stronger Captain Falcon. Without clones we wouldn't know what that was like. Why they didn't give it to Black Shadow though...


My point in this thread though is to show specifically why clones are added from a developers perspective. A lot of people either don't know or simply don't care. I was hoping to shed some light on the situation.
 
Last edited:

SvartWolf

Smash Champion
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
2,156
Location
Santiago/Chile
and i hope some people get the time to read this.... the whole, Lucina was a slot waste, do a more interesting character is kinda boring me.

I think the notion that character slots is some kind of finite resource the dev team have to manage is curious. on the other hand, developer time and workforce is THE resource that determines how big the roster is. not the other way around. as much as mii fighter uses one slot, the resources that went behind that one probably were vastly superior than say, greninja.

I'm pretty sure that the most interesting and unique the newcomer gets, the most of this resource actually spends. which for example means if ganondorf would get a whole new moveset, it would spend a something a kind a whole newcomer, instead of just being a returning veteran. (is not like it woudn't be resources well spent though I really hope his moveset gets really tweaked, I certainly wouldn't mind black shadow coming just to take old ganondorf moveset)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom