Death Bear
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 138
Ran I'll talk to ya on Nabe from Toonami later.
Got work, so,
Got work, so,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee013/ee013acbed9df374d36d85981458551b8f20cdc6" alt=""
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
These things are clarified a couple of pages back if you took the effort to read. What I don't like is that you ignore this fact and put your vote on the most likely lynch without any substance behind it. I don't care if you replaced or not, it's bad regardless.You told me we were scrambling for a lynch, so if you are opposed to the Circus route, then give me context. I asked people to tell me what was going on, and all people told me was.
The circus wagon is about as organized as the J wagon in RVS.If we are scrambling for a lynch, why is everyone going all over the place? We need to organize fast and get something done.
Circus isn't really inactive? He made one post last night.If inactives are the problem, lynch the inactives.
There isn't any gold to be found. I'm not sure what you're trying to imply.If we got gold on something scummy, lynch them.
That's not true at all, though? I see people changing their votes actually, yet some are being stubborn for no reason. These people are the ones that are gonna cause us the headache. Would you lynch Rockin based on whatever you have read?But you need to make sure this is possible and is agreeable, which based on how people are refusing to move their votes, seems pretty likely.
Your slot was talked about. Rockin is talked about. Bardull was talked about. Kuz won't get lynched today.So Soup who is an inactive no one gives a crap about?
Otherwise the only alternative is Circus or someone with enough votes.
Dear Bard,Tired of Nabe pointing the finger and thinking he's above responding to accusations made toward his slot. Also have a strong dislike regarding his general persona this game (which includes him not explaining himself whatsoever.)
Leaning more towards Nabe for defacto than Circus right now.
lolnope.jpgDear Bard,
you are really dumb.
Love,![]()
Hypocrisy doesn't make a point invalid, but I'd have expected that previous experience to reflect in your attitude here.Maybe? If you're thinking of that time you called me out for giving you a free pass for not buddying me in G3S2 Tokyo Drift or whatever that game was, then yeah, I guess I'm pretty much calling Kata out for that. Am I wrong to do so?
What I'm saying is that you called Kat out on giving me a pass for shenanigans, when judging from your other posts it seems like you actively have me as scum, read or lean. And in that situation, I'd expect you to be talking to the townmass (imagine Akira), not just Kat.You've lost me. How have I appealed to Kata in any way? Specifically mentioned what? "Thread-wide" vs. "narrow-band?" You don't have to answer all of these individual questions; I'm just trying to illustrate how much I utterly do not understand what you're saying here. I assume you probably won't respond to this at all.
I don't understand why Circus talking to Kat about Nabescum means Circus is scum. From what I can see, Circus hasn't been active enough to push his reads, so why are you reading into this as scummy behavior?Hypocrisy doesn't make a point invalid, but I'd have expected that previous experience to reflect in your attitude here.
What I'm saying is that you called Kat out on giving me a pass for shenanigans, when judging from your other posts it seems like you actively have me as scum, read or lean. And in that situation, I'd expect you to be talking to the townmass (imagine Akira), not just Kat.
I think you understand that random conflicts of personality cause wagons in D1, and certainly close to deadline, but you're sitting here asking for a concrete argument for your lynch as if you didn't already know that one doesn't exist. I can understand a townie perhaps being upset that there's no evidence to cast aside with a thrust of cool logic, but the proper thing to do in this situation would be to get involved some more in the thread and tag someone else for the gallows. Active participation in the thread is the way to turn a D1 lynch around, and the desire to do it is a good indicator of townsmanship, savvy? Scum would be much more likely to say it's unfair they were tagged and just sit on their hands, which is the attitude you're demonstrating.
540 is not an accusation of anything. I don't say anywhere in 540 that I think Swords is scum. What I do say is that in the event Bard were to flip scum, Sword is a person who should be looked at, and I give a specific reason for saying so. It's a minor connective statement to be looked at in D2, not a scumread declaration.Unvote Vote: Nabe
Look at #540. It looks like Nabe trying to lightly paint a connection on Swords, yet I think it's possible Swords may be his scum buddy. Thing is, the accusation from Nabe just seems weak
Distracting from what?and it seems light enough that it can be some sort of distraction.
Why is this odd? You voted for Circus right after Swords did, so there must have been some reason for it that you were aware of. You even badgered me to do the same. And after voting for Circus, you then asked Swords why he hadn't voted for me earlier, and he gave you a reason. Do you find the reason odd? Or are you saying you don't understand why you voted for Circus?I also found it odd Swords didn't really vote Nabe along with me. Need to re-read Swords.
What does Soup have to do with anything?Soup too. Soup is a different story though. I am putting him to slight town lean for now, because I am conflicted as to whether his waiting on Kuz and others is legit, or is him playing well as scum.
Why does that come to your mind, at all?I think it would be good to re-read Soup's interaction's with Swords, and look at why he really was going at Swords.
I'm not talking about the "missing content" that I'm apparently hiding. I'm talking about correcting people who are writing illogical posts. You didn't start posting idiocy until just now.How about no, and you try to explain while we post. Today is deadline you know. You should have done this long ago, not when a wagon is starting on you.
Hey! Now that I've responded to Ran's not-a-valid-post:Tired of Nabe pointing the finger and thinking he's above responding to accusations made toward his slot. Also have a strong dislike regarding his general persona this game (which includes him not explaining himself whatsoever.)
Leaning more towards Nabe for defacto than Circus right now.
You want to join . . . . . . what wagon now? Rockin? Any reason to believe others will join it?Ugh, I don't want to feel like ****ing Ranmaru but cmon sword
I think Bardull explained it well. You come in, and don't really elaborate much on your suspects. You know, Circus and Hilt. You just post little jabs like #540. It just didn't seem like a genuine observation, but more like an opportunity for you to fake content. It also seemed like you were doing little, trivial things like this because you had to, since you were inactive. You know, little quips like my playing differently, which you don't really explain if it was of suspicion to you or not... I don't really see the reason in going through that if you didn't really suspect me.540 is not an accusation of anything. I don't say anywhere in 540 that I think Swords is scum. What I do say is that in the event Bard were to flip scum, Sword is a person who should be looked at, and I give a specific reason for saying so. It's a minor connective statement to be looked at in D2, not a scumread declaration.
The reason you think it "seems weak" is because what you're looking at is not the thing you are labelling it as. If I had said "Swords has a dumb avatar", and you viewed it as an accusation of Swords being scum, it would certainly look weak. The statement looking weak isn't a sign of it being weak, it's a sign that you're viewing it as something it's not.
From you not really doing much, when it comes to explaining your stances.Distracting from what?
I voted Circus because I wanted a bigger Wagon and was content with voting Circus at the time, but I still thought it was odd he voted Circus when I had voted Nabe already, and I changed my mind about just staying on Circus, and instead pushing towards you since we got an extra day. (Which is why I asked him why he voted Circus instead of you)Why is this odd? You voted for Circus right after Swords did, so there must have been some reason for it that you were aware of. You even badgered me to do the same. And after voting for Circus, you then asked Swords why he hadn't voted for me earlier, and he gave you a reason. Do you find the reason odd? Or are you saying you don't understand why you voted for Circus?
This is me giving my most recent thoughts as well.What does Soup have to do with anything?
Because it sort of ties in to Soup's 'waiting' period. I feel it would be good to re-read to solidify a read on Soup.Why does that come to your mind, at all?
He is asking to be looked at, as either alignment, and you should not give him a pass on this. What he is doing is taking a backseat, allowing him to coast through the day without having to do anything meaningful. Maybe he's just a lazy ****** but that it is so obvious that he is doing it is a null tell for someone like NabeNabe would have been playing much more careful by now, and it's almost like he's asking to be looked at.
These are all the things I literally wouldn't do. :S In the posts you've pointed out from Super Heroes, I hadn't recently come back from inactivity -- it was the final day of the game, and with Ryu only posting through QT to Zen, it was a matter of me talking to Zen and hoping I said the right things, compared to the other invisible argument I couldn't see. The best way of dealing with the situation was by projecting an innocent air, and indeed some of the quotes of "?????" you pointed out express my actual feelings about the things Zen was saying, albeit a little cartoonized. This argument has nothing to do with this game.That's what I would expect scumNabe to do. He would act like a jester to confuse people and make them say "ScumNabe would NOT do that!" It's also something I would expect Nabe to do upon coming back from inactivity. He avoided a lynch in Super Heroes Mafia as Mafia because of acting this way. I will demonstrate in the next post. Can you give me examples of Nabe being careful as scum, or just why you would think he would act that way?