Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
100% the :ws: to Gorf here; see a scum can neighbor a town etc etc. it is really fun to be that scum btw
I am getting there we will lynch 100% scum and achieve perfect victory in time
he wants people to claim? the only player ive seen advocate that is real gamer, other than that ive seen an attempt at open queries about it, which rings to me just as scummy as kyryk asking for people to give him a number so he can rng vote in post 1 (hint: not scummy at all). outline his expressed desire FOR claims to be made n ill give you that. if not ill call you mechanical n push for a connection between you and real gamer upon a scumgamer flip.
No.
He was replying to macI think you and I will get along
I agree that this may be a good idea
Hijole he requires the skill of me I require of others
the question was whether or not a multiman group of players existing and having access to communication with each other outside of the thread, regardless of alignment, would be indicative of a masonry or a neighborhood. now if a scummy was in that group itd definitely be a neighborhood, since here masonries are typically DEFINED as confirm'd town with each other, but thats aside the original point.
THEN rinoke said:
Either I can't read.... or they are saying people should claim.
Yes. I have indeed seen a masonry with scum at it's helm though, a sort of recruiting masonry. It gets crazy. But neighborhoods sometimes have like the whole scumteam + a couple town, and it is either hell or supreme glory to be those town
oh. okay ill give you that. i still think merit exists to claiming whether or not people have outside communications in and of itself, like maintaining a reasonable track record in thread, unlocking more secrets to the setup, etc. but unless you think the scum team is openly willing to disclose their comfort of gaining that morsel of information this early in order to know wHo To KiLl AnD wHeN IN THREAD, no less, then your outlook is flawed. if they asked for nameclaims or who theyre partnered with thats one thing, but i dont think scumreading them for that tidbit alone holds any weight.
Operative words: "if they have access to outside communications"
You know how I know you're bsing? You said "etc." as a reason for why claiming at the beginning of d1 is a good idea.
I don't follow. Why doesn't BH just plynch slam like kita and marv?
while the 2 face shtick was whack as hell, I agree with this sentiment
Let's play a game, my friend. Flip a coin. Heads, you tell me, "Garg, I am terrible at mafia and am reaching ridiculously hard to paint a player in a negative light who doesn't deserve to be. I want to apologize for making so many stupidass comments that shouldn't be listened to by anyone. I'm sorry."
Tails? You say, "I'm scum."
I don't buy these quotes and I'm depressed and shocked that no one else in the thread challenged you on them because they're terrible. So, are you really this atrocious at mafia, Gorf?
FOS: Gorf
Whether we actually end up claiming or not is irrelevant to me; I'm much more interested in how people responded to the question (which is why I went neutral).
I can see town intent in asking questions to get reactions out of people, regardless of what said question is. Just look at all of this beautiful discussion we've gotten out of it, though this wagon on me is crappy
For the record I always "play the audience" regardless of my alignment since it usually leads to me lasting longer, but fair enough.
Huh? Where did I say I actually WANTED people to claim?
Gorf y u reaching brah?
He's voting slam last I checked.
Lets be clear that he is okay with people claiming.
