ItsRainingGravy
Smash Ace
I'm so mad at this.
Whatever its your thread you can do what you want...
I'm not looking for anyone to debate 'Mewtwo is bad in neutral because hes low tier'
If your conclusion is that DDD has better tools to deal with that scenario... then I'll quietly leave this thread forever.
First of all, when you make comments such as the above, they come off as being very provocative in nature. Stuff like "I'm so mad at this", "Whatever its your thread you can do what you want...", "If your conclusion is...then I'll quietly leave this thread for forever", "then I am done here", and the like, it sounds like you are trying to pick a fight with people.The classic one-size-fits-all response.
My claim remains. If people believe that a DDD has better options to deal with hard-camping enemies in neutral than Mewtwo, then I am done here. Its called respectfully disagreeing, not being mad or attacking.
Same for @ ItsRainingGravy my post isn't 'taking out personal grievances', I literally asked two questions. Questions that I believe if unable to be answered, defeat the entire purpose of this thread. But you did answer it, so nothings wrong?
I want this thread to be different to how traditional tiers are voted on in smash bros where its simply public opinion averaged out since you have to remember that ratings are all relative to the cast. It seems like many opinions in this thread were considering characters in a vacuum, or simply comparing them to Sheik. Mewtwo might have a bad neutral when compared to fox but not every character in the game is fast and running around with a reflector. Considering how many characters in this game employ a 'camping/zoning' playstyle, having a projectile that eats through almost everything in the game and a reflector already makes a massive difference.
When you take all the opinions and average them out and you find that Ike is in the same tier as Mario (again, packing a projectile and a reflector) do you take a step back and think 'hey... this isnt right, someone needs to move, one was either voted too high or too low'?
I don't personally see how marth/ike/lucina/roy deserve to be that high when they have no way to stop reliably projectiles aimed at their landing or approaches and their approaches are highly committal. I would have imagined having a projectile, reflector or safe approach are the 3 things that give a huge boost in neutral and not having those puts you at a massive disadvantage to characters that have 1, 2 or all of those things.
A further example is "I literally asked two questions", which gives the implication that you are calling my intelligence into question. This too feels like aggressive behavior on your part. Which clearly contradicts your statement of "respectfully disagreeing/not being mad or attacking".
You want things from this thread, but the few posts that you have made have done little outside of calling other people's posts into question. Mine, and @ ぱみゅ . Outside of that, you haven't really contributed much to this thread. Additionally, when you have "contributed", you have done so in an unnecessarily aggressive mannerism. Which is counter-intuitive to this thread for a few reasons. The first reason being that things like this require time and patience. The second reason is that this is a group effort.
When you make posts like what you have done, not only are you showing a lack of patience, but you are also only here for the things that you want. And, when you don't get the things that you want (which apparently has already happened), you make sure to show a lot of contempt in retaliation by trying to make examples out of people. And that is not a very proper manner of conducting yourself. Not just for an online forum, but for life in general.
And in regards to your worries to the direction this thread is taking, there are other methods for achieving your desired goals. Instead of making posts with passive aggressive jabs at other members, focus on the characters instead. Such as "I feel as though Mewtwo should be higher, because...". If you do this, you will not only achieve your goals more efficiently, but you will also obtain more respect from other people. Especially if you don't do things like calling their intelligence into question. Simply put, just remove the mentions of other people from your posts, since it isn't necessary and just causes drama.
Over time, as I have stated before, the lists will become more and more accurate when more opinions and more data arrive. But it's going to take time, and patience before we achieve that. Because, even as unbiased as people try to make things out to be, there is always going to be some level of bias most anywhere you go in life. After all, people are prone to forget things, over/under hype things, and make mistakes. That is why other people serve as a sort of "checks and balances" sort of system, to help even things out and prevent stuff (such as data) from getting out of hand. Likewise, this topic was built using a similar premise. If tier lists aren't doing nearly enough to cut it, why not have a topic that focuses on the Neutral/Advantage/Disadvantage states as a form of checks and balances to help explain why characters are as good as they are, rather than simply just stating it. I thought it was a great idea for its own topic, so here we are.
Moving off of that small tangent though, just relax. You are trying to rush, and force things to happen too much. It doesn't help things move along faster. Rather, it just creates friction, and tension between people. And I will politely ask you to try to conduct yourself in a more dignified manner. Thank you in advance
This will be my last post in regards to this subject, as it is off-topic.
Lastly, your opinions about Mewtwo and other characters will still be taken into consideration. And I appreciate your thoughts about them.
---
I did that on semi-purpose to get people to talk about him But also because, as a Ness player myself, I really don't think his Neutral is all that great. But at the same time, I don't exactly know where to place him. For the characters above him, I feel as though a good portion of them outclass Ness in terms of range and speed. However, what you said is still correct: It is a bit lower than it should be. Since, now that I look at it, Ness has more "safeness" to his moves than the Rank ★★ characters for sure. As for what Rank he is between 2.5, 3, or 3.5...I'm not entirely sure. Maybe not Rank ★★★☆, but probably Rank ★★☆ or ★★★. Either way, I will be bumping him up sometime soon. Until then, I would like to see more opinions about him~I feel like Ness is WAY too low now. Dropping to 3.5, 3 or maybe 2.5 sure, but his neutral is not SO bad. 1.5 is really low. He'd be invalidated at the neutral level by the 5, 4.5 and maybe even 4 stars if his neutral was really that bad.
I'm in agreement that Browny's response was a tad aggressive but I do agree that Mewtwo's neutral is not that bad. He has a reflector, a great projectile, good frame data on his jab and grab, some fast aerials and good range. He's let down by bad hitboxes, some pretty slow attacks and other stuff like his bad double jump, floatiness and poor weight/hurtbox, though some of that bleeds into his disadvantage state. Perhaps a 2 or 2.5 star rating for his neutral?
I don't think Greninja needs to be moved, I just think he's useful to discuss as a 4 star benchmark. Rosie and Diddy seem fine too but it depends how we play things with Sheik.
Yeah, Mewtwo's not that bad. His frame data kind of is (frame 6 jab is still on the more sluggish side), but he is the only character in the game with both a chargeable projectile and a reflector in one package. He also really doesn't have any good OoS options either. I think Rank ★★ is good for now, but Rank ★★☆ isn't too much of a stretch either.
Greninja at Rank ★★★★ seems fine to me for now imo. Dash Grab, Shurikens, Ftilt, Jab, Utilt, top tier mobility specs, and his frame 13 Fsmash (one of the fastest in the game) makes him a potent threat in the Neutral. His lack of OoS options does suck, though. Rank ★★★☆ wouldn't be too bad for him either...no higher or lower than those two ranks, though.
Good points about Samus Thank you! Not too sure about Zelda, but better than Jiggs and Ganon I can see.Samus's neutral isn't good but it is better than Zelda, Jiggly, Ganon, G&W, etc. I would put it somewhere in the 1.5ish area. Maybe 2. The strong points of her neutral are definitely not fsmash and ftilt, they're zair, dash attack, up b OOS, and a very good SHAD with many ways to act out of it--mainly uair, which is a good aerial. This is enough to make her better in the neutral than the characters I mentioned earlier. Also good but not quite as good are bombs, missiles (still projectiles even if they aren't amazing. They still function very similarly to most projectiles as far as neutrals go), bair sweet spot (safe on shield and lots of shield damage), and dair (also safe on shield). Bair isn't a huge deal because it can be challenging to land on many characters.
Also we should discuss G&W. I feel like his neutral is awful, maybe half a star. Nothing good oos, a pretty bad grab, and very unsafe aerials. No good projectiles, can get camped very easily, and bad range. His dash attack is one of the only things going for him. This character would be good except for his neutral, which I think actually makes a case for being the worst.
Whoever does earn the title of worst neutral should get zero stars. Just a thought, somebody has to.
As for G&W...yeah, his Neutral feels pretty bad. He can't even SHAD either. Not sure about it being the worst, but it definitely holds him back for sure.
I'll consider the "zero star" rating Only fair, since I pretty much labeled Sheik as being #1 in the category. But only because it was a mostly unanimous opinion about her performance in the category. If there isn't a unanimous opinion about there being a "worst" character in Neutral, then maybe/maybe not~
Last edited: