d00d rAkE iS cHiLl He HaS tO bE tOwN!!!!11
^btw if nobody's been able to tell this is my sarcastic sounding-like-a-****** voice. yea rake needs to be smacked up.
Yeah I was right Gorf was being sarcastic and also backs the wagon.
So we have gogogo HBC marshy, Gorf, and adum backing the lynch. I can say for
sure that I myself do not support what happened, JeXs showed no intent to actually
lynch Rake due to his unvoting and was just lending a hand to the pressure. The only other person on the wagon was Captain Hotcakes, who should understand that lynching in the first day of gameplay is stupid and not okay. For a new player to exhibit the whole hardbody mentality is strange to me for sure. But nevertheless, he did want Rake dead as well.
Look at the way he handled the wagon
There's nothing in these posts aside from votes and obligtory "WOAAAH guys he's at L-1 let's careful here"
It screams of someone trying to slip into the wagon discretley.
I like the point that Dark Horse is trying to make here. I don't necessarily agree with it. So far I am not seeing scum in JeXs, but I like the initiative from Dark Horse either way.
Hmm,
@
JeXs
why the change here?
I like that Dark Horse's opinion of JeXs made Ruy stop and think and ask JeXs for clarification. Nothing malicious from Ruy, and it's a good gesture to try to inquire into something potentially suspicious.
Haha, where's the actual defense? Your posts not only lacked substance but gave you an easy way to turn on them in the future. "Interesting", it's one of the best non-committal ways to look like you're producing content when being utterly useless and allowing you to draw any conclusion in the future. Explain what results actually suggest about the player or shut up, if it's about future actions, shut up. You also spend entirely too much time explaining town reads and the only things leaning scumish are people who are leading a lynch wagon on you. The people shouting "die rake die" specifically
Here is the first example of actual reasoning being laid out for Rake scum. The assertion that Rake's RVS and pre-game posts lacked substance is ridiculous, especially from adumb who said that people
should not be posting substance before the game starts. Disgusting hypocrisy just to paint Rake as scummy. Besides, I've come to realize Rake always talks like this and calls things "interesting" this and "worth looking into" that. There is nothing behind this point at all. Next.
Rake is apparently
spending too much time explaining his townreads. So Rake ignores the pressure from a stupid wagon in favour of fleshing out thoughts in thread, and apparently
explaining his reads is a point
against him? And because the only people he doesn't like are people pushing him, he's scummy?
NEWS FLASH: The only big event in the thread has consisted of people pushing him. Every scummy action that has occurred so far has been by people who have voted for him. I see it that way too. Adumb is making up points out of thin air to justify a wagon that is completely totally bull****. It's absurd.
This rush of desperate content just cements it because it has exactly the same problem, beyond moving off hotcakes and agreeing with my read.
This makes it painfully clear that adumb was going to stay on Rake no matter what Rake did. Adumb is not looking for Rake's alignment, he's looking for points he can make to justify the wagon. Suddenly Rake is making a "rush of desperate content" to appear townie. I ask myself what exactly Rake was supposed to do to get people off of him. When I come up blank, it's clear there was either tunneling going on, or scum driving the wagon. I'm thinking it was the latter, because tunneling usually requires
points for a townie to cling to. Adumb has none.
Now then, why is it grimy, and if it's so grimy, why aren't you voting for me? Breaking down and explaining why a post from somebody leading a lynch wagon on you isn't scummy, but proceeding to throw analysisless dirt on them is, doing it and not following it up with a vote, even more so unless you have a higher scum target, and what luck, you have none!
So then you'll die, totally fine with this result. 99.9% likely that you'll die post-claim too though.
Lol, meta isn't something you just throw on to see if it sticks, you need actual analysis of the play across multiple games. But the important part is, more dirt (of the "interesting" non-commital variety) and still no vote!
Would you kindly die?
And finally, since Rake is calling people scum without voting for them, he is scum. The sad part is that this is the most solid point that has been made against him at this point.
People credited adumb for being the only one on Rake who even gave reasoning. After the mislynch occurred, they wanted to call him the most townie because "at least he made it clear why he was doing it."
The truth though, is that he didn't have any reasoning worth ****. No one did. And the fact that he tried to make it seem like he
did is the
scummiest thing anyone did on the wagon. marshy I expect it from. I hate it and I'm glad scum Night Killed him. But I expect it. Past that I have nothing but bewilderment.
I'm still reading of course, but between this and adumb's recent play (vs Chaco, vs Mac, wrt setup discussion), he needs to die.
Vote: ascumbrodeus
