Recent content by Kaladin

Sure, I can do that.

Oi, I'm still here.

I'm still /in.

I'd be ok with simply removing the 1 second rule, if grabs always air released and never ground released. It'd still be overall detrimental to the game, but I'd be alright with it.

/in 10 chars

I thought the game would be started by now, as a responsible individual ima have to /out, since I won't have internet access at all next week. If you still haven't started by then, however, I'll /in.

It makes it so scum will never be in a situation where they have to vote for another scum, revealing themselves. It's still shady and would probably still get them lynched the next day, but they wouldn't be screwed mechanically.

Consider this: we're at the point where there are two players without votes on them. One is scum, one is not. Scum if scum partner votes for the scum without a vote, the day ends. Since it was a phantom vote, the lynch is randomized. If the scum is lynched, we then know that the one person who...

One shot per game, or per day?

Eh, don't scrap it just yet. It's really interesting on a conceptual level, and I'd like to see if it can be made to work. What if it was made so that if mafia vote each other, they receive some sort of penalty -- no night actions, maybe?

"If you ignore some of the best metaknights in the world vs some of the best sheiks in the world and instead look at one player's results..." Yeah, sorry, no. In reality, both results and theory back up the claim that it's 55-45.

So, someone could vote every other player to prove their innocence? Can we have a gentleman's agreement not to do so?

Wait... So is there anything preventing the mafia from just constantly voting each other? Even if it became really obvious, they couldn't be lynched, right? I guess there must be night actions to offset that.

Since it could be rather important in this setup, what randomization technique do you intend to use?