i put him at viable because n64 beat reno.
I just wanted to say that. Was anyone else at rom2?
I also don't agree entirely with having only viable matchups matter. I see the point of it, as the likeliness of a player encountering someone who plays a non-viable char in tournament is slim, and that ylink beats jiggs (just for supposition) doesn't matter much if he loses to pretty much every other high tier. I think however that the benefits from including all characters would outweigh any deficits.
First, releasing a third of a matchup chart isn't going to please a majority of the people. Even if sheik ***** kirby (sorry pink reaper) and that doesn't have an affect on her tourney performance, we still should represent it so that when random new smasher is looking for a char to pick up they can be like "oh, kirby does actually suck." As well, I think it would just look better / look like we actually put effort into making a complete one.
Second, while somewhat negligible I think the effect of some matchups below high tier do matter. If jiggs has trouble against lower tiers than sheik, she can potentially be knocked out by one if the matchup happens. This is much less valuable than her matchups vs other high tiers I agree, as that's most often what she will encounter, but it's still worth considering imo.