I really dont think pools should count for PR's at all considering their function in tournament
Pools are created from PR's iirc
So, if pools matches influenced PR's, couldnt they perpetuate immobility in the rankings?
Pools are also used to seed the bracket, so
as opposed to being used as an additional tool to balance the "conservative," less changing nature of the PR's, wouldnt they in theory just marginalize the effect that pools have in seeding?
The
swiss format that was used here (and adjusted for smash) at the last tournament is pretty good.
But instead of running the entire tournament in swiss, final scores were used for bracket seeding. PR's used in this instance are still practical, but they dont necessarily directly influence final seeding, they just make things less random (read: not necessarily more predictable)
Pros:
After swiss seeding, you pretty much
cannot complain about your seed
You play a good amount of matches before the tournament with people on/near your level (except for maybe the first round), so results are less preordained
Cons:
May (or may not) take longer than pools because your full series of matches is not pre-set, so you cant have, say, Nathan Ducketshire sit down and play out all of his matches and be done
Its a little more work for the TO(s) to calcuate who should play next after each series of games, but it sort of replaces the more subjective seeding system that follows after pools matches have been played out, so idk it might be the same amount of work