Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm a bad user? How?There's not much else I can do other than laugh.
It's a shame this is a good idea, but we have such a bad user managing the thread.
☆ You don't have to, I just like looking at style post on threads since there's not many color uses. =P ☆Sorry Viper, it's not worth replying to if I have to fix your strange font.
☆ Thanks, but lets see what more users have to say about this though. If some of the users know Kirby potential on this games as well as Marth's. )= ☆I might just advance Kirby, since Viper's backing himself up with GOOD facts and all.
I take it you've never played a Kirby game in your life. If Kirby swallowed Marth, or just even Marth's sword, Kirby would not "lose his insides." He's eaten enemies with swords and with spikes. When he does that, he acquires a sword or is able to produce spikes out of his own body. Blades of any kind would not kill Kirby if he swallowed them.And even if Kirby could swallow him, I think he would just lose his insides as well.
+1 Marth
Erhm.I'm a bad user? How?
You're not a bad user, it's just this thread is really biased right now. You're trying to make Kirby win just because Viper has a good argument, and you never really state any of the rules in the first post so people know how things go. As a result, it seems like you're just letting things go the way you want them to, and it caused some confusion back in the Roy vs. Pichu vote.I might just advance Kirby, since Viper's backing himself up with GOOD facts and all.
☆ You mean Kirby, the guy who beats a galactic overlord, the darkest evil, even Meta Knight, who said to have the strongest sword in the galaxies, and he can't bet a swordsmen?!? You really haven't played all his games. D= ☆
This two part of the posts is the posts that made me decide the what to vote for. Kirby. :DI take it you've never played a Kirby game in your life. If Kirby swallowed Marth, or just even Marth's sword, Kirby would not "lose his insides." He's eaten enemies with swords and with spikes. When he does that, he acquires a sword or is able to produce spikes out of his own body. Blades of any kind would not kill Kirby if he swallowed them.
thisI take it you've never played a Kirby game in your life. If Kirby swallowed Marth, or just even Marth's sword, Kirby would not "lose his insides." He's eaten enemies with swords and with spikes. When he does that, he acquires a sword or is able to produce spikes out of his own body. Blades of any kind would not kill Kirby if he swallowed them.
Kirby is invulnerable to being cut, and is a black hole. Marth literally stands no chance, because kirby can't be sliced by his blade. And as soon as kirby eats marth, marth will die, kaput. In the kirby games, the enemies you eat never pop out. Also, kirby can fly forever. Marth may be a quality swordsman, but he can't really do much against kirby when kirby can just float away, can't be hurt, and can eat him whole instantly. +1 Kirby.
If you don't like it, then please don't participate. And btw, read the OP, the part where it says "true to their games", meaning ALL characters are allowed their true abilities.This is an extremely bad thread because you have regular humans vs. fictional creatures with unrealistic abilities.
The fact that Kirby cannot be cut in any way shape or form solely because the game designers made him that way only makes this contest stupid. If Kirby can't be harmed, then he wins the entire contest.
If this were real life settings, Kirby would lose. THIS IS A BAD IDEA.
This entire contest makes Mario, Donkey Kong, Link, Fox, Pikachu, Marth, Game and Watch, Luigi, Diddy, Zelda/Sheik, Falco, Pokemon Trainer, Ike, Snake, Peach, Yoshi, Ganondorf, Ice Climbers, Wolf, Wario, Toon Link, ROB, Olimar, and Captain Falcon inviable because they don't have special powers that prevent them from being in pain.
Kirby, Samus, Ness, Lucas, Sonic, Meta Knight, and MAYBE Bowser are the only characters that could be in this.
After Viper's and Dryn's post, just about everyone else who came here posted Kirby for the win, that's why Kirby got the most votes.How did Kirby win when Marth got more votes?
Biased?oh dont like diddy so i vote for dr. mario!!!!!
me said:Mario vs. Link
wut he says- Link[6] Mario[0] [iiiiii][] YES
Ike vs. Sonic
wut he says- Sonic[12] Ike[6] [iiiiiiiiiii][iiiiiii] NO [11][7]
Pit vs. DK
wut he says- Pit[0] DK[5] [][iiiiiiiiiiiiii] NO [0][14]
Olimar vs. Metaknight
wut he says- MK[6] oLIMAR[0] [iiiiiiii] NO [1][8]
Pokemon Trainer vs. Lucario
wut he says- PT[5] Lucario[1] [iiiiiiii][ii] NO [8][2]
Zelda/Shiek vs. Ice Climbers
wut he says- Zelda/Shiek[5] ICs[0] [iiiii] YES
Mewtwo vs. Ness
wut he says- Mew2[0] Ness[0] [iiiiii][iiiiiii] HELLLLL NO [6][7]
Pikachu vs. Luigi
wut he says- Pika[3] Luigi[4] [ii][iii] NO [2][3]
Roy vs. YL
wut he says- Roy[10] YL[3] [iiiiiiiii][iiiii] NO [9][6]
Peach vs. Pichu
wut he says- Peach [5] Pichu[4] [iiiiii][iiii] [6][4]
Samus vs. Fox
wut he says- Samus[7] Fox[1] [iiiiiiiii] NO [9][1]
Kirby vs. Marth
wut he says- Kirby[17] Marth[6] [iiiiiiiiiiiiiii][iiiii] NO [15][5]
Dr. Mario vs. Diddy Kong
wut he says- Dr. Mario[0] Diddy[0] NO [iiii][iiii] [4][4]
K, sorry about that. But I did advance the right character though, right? and yeah, I should make a rule like that.Mmk. Now, I'm not coming in and trying to start something, but Raizen, this is ridiculous. You're not counting the votes right, and just making up rules and letting characters advance when they shouldn't be able to. I took the responsibility and counted all the votes for you, so I can show you how wrong you're doing this. Now, I don't know whether I counted them right, but I know for sure I did a better job then you. No, I'm not trying to be elitist.
The i's are my tallies, the 'yes' or 'no' means whether you got it right or wrong. As you can see, you only got two right.
I suggest making a rule that forces people to say, I VOTE FOR ____ so you don't get confused counting the votes. If you have pepole just saying 'lol kirby is awsum', that should NOT count as a vote. Make the rules clear, don't make them up as you go along. In the current state this is at, it is just easy +1 post thread. Make people back up their vote, and clearly say I vote for/I think that ___ would win. If you're counting your votes, then either say it in the OP or say it in the post in which you are presenting the topic for the day. Seriously, make this a better thread, or it's gonna get closed.