Nine
Smash Journeyman
I'm surprised the community hasn't tweeted much.
Let's go!
Let's go!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
TriForceGameMaster @EMP_TriForce_GM
@Zophar321@NintendoAmerica Reggie suggested that Smash had to be a definite pick. The other two were Mario Kart and a new Tetris for Wii U.
https://twitter.com/EMP_TriForce_GM/status/395296025927098368
See this is the problem. Nintendo already knows this stuff exists, but literally don't care. And they really have no reason to.Regardless of winning or not, both Nintendo and Reggie will see that there is a HUGE supporting smash scene,
Precisely. You'd probably have ten times as much success getting them to sport Brawl and convincing no one to show up.I don't think melee is the type of game that fits this. They are just asking, I think, rhetorically what people would want to see if there was a revival of Nintendo World Championships. For the uninitiated it was basically a tournament where competitors would get a special, modded cart with 3 games: Super Mario Brothers, Rad Racer, and Tetris and has a certain amount of time to get a high score. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_World_Championships
This isn't an actual tournament from the looks of it and I'm guessing they want stuff like "oh new super mario brothers u get 50 coins or catch nizbit" along those lines, but showing NoA that we are a vocal community (as if they didn't already know) and while we might not work for this is (more just a rhetorical question than anything else from the looks of it) they might throw us a bone sometime soon.
I'm still laughing.And people laughed when we told Smashers to get twitter.
Yeah, but I really can't bring myself to vote for a game that I actively dislike. Sorry.Just trying to keep it real here... if you're voting Melee then you really should toss Brawl a vote too.
Thanks for the support, M2K.Everyone create a twitter right now if you haven't already.
www.twitter.com
don't be lazy plz, we've needed this in the past several times this past year, we need it right now, and I'm sure we'll need it more in the future.
If you want to keep it real, then you should realize barlw is dying as soon as Smash 4 launches (if not sooner). It is a dead-end game unlike Melee which will be maintaining its very healthy competitive scene for at least the unforeseeable future.It says current games. Brawl is a current game, Melee definitely isn't. The Brawl community helped Melee get into EVO, how about the Melee community helps out the Brawl community this time? We do still exist, you know.
Before I get flamed, this is coming from someone who has probably entered more Melee tournaments this year than Brawl tournaments. All I'm saying is that Brawl has a much better chance of making it in, and I'm sure most Melee players know it. Just like how Brawl players knew Melee had a better chance of making it into EVO and voted for Melee instead. Brawl was an option in the poll, if you remember. Why be selfish and vote for Melee this time? You know how Nintendo feels about Melee. The Smash community will benefit regardless of which game gets in.
Just trying to keep it real here... if you're voting Melee then you really should toss Brawl a vote too.
Brawl is current, vibrant tournament scene. Melee isn't as current, but certainly on a lot of tongues because of EVO/documentary. Any Smash title is a victory, I personally voted for both.
You obviously don't care about Smash as a whole, only what the 4th word of the game-title says.
Obviously I cannot speak for anyone else, but I think super smash bros. brawl is a bad game and I don't see why I would vote for it just by virtue of being in the same franchise as the games that I think are good. I don't care about "Smash as a whole" because I do not like "Smash as a whole." There's a good more to the differences between the games than a word in a title, and if you asked me today to go purchase final fantasy XIII because I liked the first nine games in the series I would probably go on a lengthy diatribe about its flaws and tell you very candidly that I wouldn't support it unless you put a gun to my head. I've absolutely no reason to treat smash differently in that respect.You obviously don't care about Smash as a whole, only what the 4th word of the game-title says.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but as others have said Brawl is a more current game. That being said it would most likely be the preferred game to put into something like the NWC. How could it hurt to vote for both?Obviously I cannot speak for anyone else, but I think super smash bros. brawl is a bad game and I don't see why I would vote for it just by virtue of being in the same franchise as the games that I think are good. I don't care about "Smash as a whole" because I do not like "Smash as a whole." There's a good more to the differences between the games than a word in a title, and if you asked me today to go purchase final fantasy XIII because I liked the first nine games in the series I would probably go on a lengthy diatribe about its flaws and tell you very candidly that I wouldn't support it unless you put a gun to my head. I've absolutely no reason to treat smash differently in that respect.
I mean no disrespect to brawl players (or final fantasy xiii fans, for that matter, I think lightning is hot too don't worry).
Using the original NWC as reference, I can see it being Smash 4 with the stage being Battlefield and 2 minute timer, and the goal is to see who racks the most KOs.TriForceGameMaster @EMP_TriForce_GM
@Zophar321@NintendoAmerica Reggie suggested that Smash had to be a definite pick. The other two were Mario Kart and a new Tetris for Wii U.
https://twitter.com/EMP_TriForce_GM/status/395296025927098368
See there is an inherit problem with this mentality, it implies that every person who plays brawl with just play brawl. Just because the games are fundamentally different, by the sheer virtue of being part of a series, it will attract attention to the other community.Obviously I cannot speak for anyone else, but I think super smash bros. brawl is a bad game and I don't see why I would vote for it just by virtue of being in the same franchise as the games that I think are good. I don't care about "Smash as a whole" because I do not like "Smash as a whole." There's a good more to the differences between the games than a word in a title, and if you asked me today to go purchase final fantasy XIII because I liked the first nine games in the series I would probably go on a lengthy diatribe about its flaws and tell you very candidly that I wouldn't support it unless you put a gun to my head. I've absolutely no reason to treat smash differently in that respect.
I mean no disrespect to brawl players (or final fantasy xiii fans, for that matter, I think lightning is hot too don't worry).
But if melee isn't an opinion, why wouldn't you support another smash game that will support your own community. If it's only modern games and melee doesn't count, instead of just writing it off as saying "brawl is bad" just vote for it, it will lead people to smashboards and melee in the process.There is a difference, for me, between supporting the community of a game and supporting the game itself. I very much appreciate the support brawl's community has given melee (2008 notwithstanding) and vice versa. But to send the message to Nintendo "yes, I believe in this game and wish to see it represented, this is an acceptable standard of game design and quality" would be absolutely disingenuous of me. Shouting out a brawl stream so that anyone interested can find it is far from the same thing as telling the game's makers that I think they did a good job with this, and that's a tacit approval I'm not comfortable making. And I'm very certainly not convinced that it would be good for melee to do so.