choknater
Smash Obsessed
jeff's **** is consensual
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
haha yes this is true.He was on Rainbow Road while Tang was merely on Luigi Circuit.
well then i guess when i go to norcal you guys are gonna get your mind blown by my DI ^^shroomed has pretty good DI, especially in that set.
Go to the profile for these vids and look for the most recent SJSU vids with Tang vs Lunin and watch it.what match were the commentators always talking about where tang had a sick comeback.
Yeah probably.well then i guess when i go to norcal you guys are gonna get your mind blown by my DI ^^
Kinda looks like you DI out of being able to combo a dash attack to forward air properly at times.well then i guess when i go to norcal you guys are gonna get your mind blown by my DI ^^
........... lolIt seems like the trend ever since brawl came on the scene is that almost everyone left in melee is a techy player. The level of mindgames coming from people that make it to the finals should be a lot better.
SS is a really smart dude, but everyone else def needs to step their thinking game up. Pink Shinobi did surprise me a little, but he seemed to be winning off his player's mistakes a lot. (although admittedly this is what peach's game really relies on heavily, but this was a bit in excess, ESPECIALLY vs lunin)
Tang is just fast. The commentary made him sound like a beast, but IMO he's another fast fox player with very mid-level strategy and thinking game.
Do you think at this point in melee's life cycle, anyone who's watching the videos actually needs to know the percentages where, say, falcon's dair combos into knee? (all percentages for SS )... commentary is there to give the feel of watching the match in person, not to be informational.The commentary def needed to be more about what was actually happening in the match, and not just a bunch of yelling garbz into a mic.
ya know. i disagree with more than half of what you're saying. but i'm glad you aren't being ridiculously ignorant about it.It seems like the trend ever since brawl came on the scene is that almost everyone left in melee is a techy player. The level of mindgames coming from people that make it to the finals should be a lot better.
SS is a really smart dude, but everyone else def needs to step their thinking game up. Pink Shinobi did surprise me a little, but he seemed to be winning off his player's mistakes a lot. (although admittedly this is what peach's game really relies on heavily, but this was a bit in excess, ESPECIALLY vs lunin)
Tang is just fast. The commentary made him sound like a beast, but IMO he's another fast fox player with very mid-level strategy and thinking game.
The commentary def needed to be more about what was actually happening in the match, and not just a bunch of yelling garbz into a mic.
Uh that commentary was garbage. There's no bias with me because I'm in the midwest and if anything I should favor you guys more since I'm in the midwest. Anyways commentating a match should not be about screaming in the ****in mic because anyone can do that. It should be about intelligently analyzing the match up and what's goin on with the occasional screams of excitement. If the people playing weren't so ****ing good, I wouldn't have even watched them because they were so **** annoying.lol at jfox hatin on west coast. he just mad cuzz west coast commentary is better than theres.
ps tang is a beast the best player in the world.lol
lol u talkin like im bias im from TX. and if u dont like what they are sayin turn down the volume.Uh that commentary was garbage. There's no bias with me because I'm in the midwest and if anything I should favor you guys more since I'm in the midwest. Anyways commentating a match should not be about screaming in the ****in mic because anyone can do that. It should be about intelligently analyzing the match up and what's goin on with the occasional screams of excitement. If the people playing weren't so ****ing good, I wouldn't have even watched them because they were so **** annoying.
Wtf is this commentary "should be like" business? Commentary should be good. Good = entertaining or informing in my book. I don't really care which, although if I had to pick I'd pick the former because I already know about the game and it's highly unlikely any commentary is going to actually inform me. Lmfao @ people having a high horse about commentary. Plz stfu.Uh that commentary was garbage. There's no bias with me because I'm in the midwest and if anything I should favor you guys more since I'm in the midwest. Anyways commentating a match should not be about screaming in the ****in mic because anyone can do that. It should be about intelligently analyzing the match up and what's goin on with the occasional screams of excitement. If the people playing weren't so ****ing good, I wouldn't have even watched them because they were so **** annoying.