Project M Ultimate Discussion

LunchmanJ

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Messages
206
#1
So for those who don't know, Project M is a mod to make Brawl have the same competitiveness as Melee. Right now, people are working on a Project M for Smash Bros Ultimate. Seems kinda unnecessary, right? Kinda offensive? Well, I would say that both Ultimate and the Melee style should be available at the same time. I don't know about the legality of it, but whatever.

I personally think that the Melee physics SHOULD be replicated, but the movesets should be based on the meta from Ultimate. You take an Ultimate character, balance him and give him new tricks, BAM. You're done. I love Melee, but it is like 20 years old. It would be a repeat of Icons: Combat Arena.

For new characters, I think we should get:
  1. Chibi Robo - Mini robot with an electric plug who cleans your house. His series may seem unknown and his sales weak, but his games have a cult following and an Amiibo.
  2. Isaac from Golden Sun - Anime boy who uses elemental magic. People don't really know him, but his game has a following as well. Less recognizable but more dedicated. It's for this reason that he is one of the most requested characters.
  3. Andy from Advance Wars - The Commander of his own little army in the games of Advance Wars. Same logic as Isaac.
  4. Ray from Custom Robo - Custom Robo is played by less people and has low sales, but where he shines is that he is top tier in that many people have heard of his games, more than Isaac and Andy.
  5. Waluigi
  6. Birdo
  7. Paper Mario
  8. Fawful
  9. Ashley from WarioWare
  10. Dixie Kong
  11. Skull Kid
  12. Bandana Dee
  13. Krystal from Star Fox
  14. Tom Nook from Animal Crossing
  15. Shadow the Hedgehog or Knuckles the Echidna - Low key, Shadow is going to be the next DLC fighter (alongside Waluigi). Why? Because he is the ultimate "holy **** my childhood" meme for this generation. If that happens, we got Knuckles.
I reject:
1. Rhythm Heaven character - Their games sell well, but does anyone remember a single character or game even if they played it? They are all stock characters.
2. Flavor of the week Pokemon or Fire Emblem - I never like these additions since Lucario in Brawl. Does anybody really get hype for these characters unless they were already in previous games? You could say they are somewhat important, but they literally only appear in one game. A character like Scorbunny does not even have his game out yet.

Movesets changes (if the game is to be truly different than vanilla Ultimate, then I'll just go all out.)
1. Mario, Luigi - Make them more like 3D Land and Super Mario Galaxy. Add in all their types of jumping and stuff.
2. Ganondorf - Just revamp his moveset already. I don"t give a **** there's still Ganondorf mains.
3. Dark Samus, Lucina, and Daisy - Upgrade from Echo to unique moveset.
4. Bowser Jr - Paintbrush from Super Mario Sunshine.
5. Wario - Take off all that jankyness and farts, and make him more Wario Land.
6. Impa over Sheik - Same moveset, different model. Maybe reworked to be more Sheikah. We don't need that chain side b.

FRICKIN CUT SOME CHARACTERS SAKURAI
1. Dr Mario
2. Pichu
3. Young Link
4. Dark Pit
5. Wii Fit Trainer
6. Robin
7. Corrin
8. Bayonetta - Broken character that was stated to be number 1 in the ballot, but like, that's obviously not true.
9. Richter Belmont - Mainly because he's same as Simon and nobody asked for him.
10. Miis - They make the addition of truly new characters cheap and disposable. Plus they are a chore for competitive play.
11. Jigglypuff
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
3,131
#3
So I want to ask: now that Ultimate's low landing lag is now essentially auto L-canceling, how would that pan out in a Melee-like environment?
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
776
Location
Virginia
3DS FC
5198-2617-9626
#5
Personally, a mod I would want to see would be to mix Ultimate and Melee's gameplay together (Or essentially mostly Melee and remove some unnecessary aspects of it). There are some things I don't think we need back from Melee and same as Ultimate. L canceling would be pointless to implement and Wave dashing can be up in the air and I don't really care it was in or not (As I heard some players don't really care for it, I also heard Mang0 saying the same thing in a stream once).
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
3,131
#6
You add lag to aerials back in then add L canceling to cancel it out.
In a perfect world, that would be the right solution.

But you know the Smash fandom is a bunch of sheep. One moment, they want L-canceling to come back in its full manual form, but now that Ultimate gives low landing lag, nearly everyone proclaims L-canceling was garbage and never should have existed.
 
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
538
#7
In a perfect world, that would be the right solution.

But you know the Smash fandom is a bunch of sheep. One moment, they want L-canceling to come back in its full manual form, but now that Ultimate gives low landing lag, nearly everyone proclaims L-canceling was garbage and never should have existed.
You and I already went through this in great detail. Unless you were just asking OP purely for context. But it seems like you are saying the community is contradicting themselves when really it's a combination of differing opinions and people figuring out L-Cancel is a horrible game design choice.

Anyway, I have enough programming background to easily do at the very least a rebalancing mod of Ultimate if I had the tools. I just don't think the tools are refined enough yet, and considering the Switch is going to be a major console for Nintendo in the foreseeable future, I don't know when the Switch will be super safe to hack and play with.
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2018
Messages
104
#9
changing ultimate to be like melee would be a disaster there is a reason project M drop that idea, imagine balacing 70+ characters with 3 frame jumpsquat aka: the same as melee fox, most characters do more damage that their melee counter pack, sans specific moves, characters are more faster in ultimate compared to melee without the extra movement options of dash dancing, waveland, and wavedash, shields mechanics are weaker in ultimate, DI is weaker, SDI too, the results would be more akin to smash 64.
 

Zachmac

Delusional Zard Loyalist
Premium
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
5,566
Location
California
3DS FC
4210-4109-6434
NNID
AbsolBlade
Switch FC
SW-1754-5854-0794
#10
Eh I don't think it'll quite catch on. Part of the reason Project M originally got as big as it did was because Brawl was such a disaster competitively already and making it more like Melee was the most obvious way fans could think of to "fix" it. I idea of a Project M for Wii U was brought up a few times and never really got came to fruition, and I think that may have been in part because it was already a decent competitive game even if it was pretty flawed itself.

Currently Ultimate doesn't have any massive, jarring flaws that absolutely need fixing. Making it more like Melee will just make it more like Melee - unlike Brawl, it wouldn't necessarily make it a better competitive game. I don't see where the demand for something like this would really be. I think Melee fans will just keep playing Melee and Ultimate fans will just keep playing Ultimate.
 

LunchmanJ

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Messages
206
#11
So for those who don't know, Project M is a mod to make Brawl have the same competitiveness as Melee. Right now, people are working on a Project M for Smash Bros Ultimate. Seems kinda unnecessary, right? Kinda offensive? Well, I would say that both vanilla Ultimate and the Melee style should be available at the same time. I don't know about the legality of it, but whatever.

I personally think that the Melee physics SHOULD be replicated, but the movesets should be based on the meta from Ultimate. You take an Ultimate character, balance him and give him new tricks, BAM. You're done. I love Melee, but it is like 20 years old. Don't do a repeat of Icons: Combat Arena.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
538
#13
Literally went over this in the OP.

As someone who grew up playing Project M, I think adding L Canceling back in is really a non issue. Like it's such a minor detail and is basically the same. I don't think people hate it that much.
Well like someone already said, making it more like Melee is not synonymous with making the game better. And if L-Cancelling was added back, it would basically be a game wide movement nerf that is only compensated for with a rapid fire quick time event system. Who asks for stuff like that?

So in this regard at least, someone would be actively making the game worse from a design standpoint just so they can be "like Melee", which honestly shows me that people who would want that horrible design added back into the game don't actually understand why Melee is so great. Hint: it's not the APM.
 

LunchmanJ

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Messages
206
#14
Well like someone already said, making it more like Melee is not synonymous with making the game better. And if L-Cancelling was added back, it would basically be a game wide movement nerf that is only compensated for with a rapid fire quick time event system. Who asks for stuff like that?

So in this regard at least, someone would be actively making the game worse from a design standpoint just so they can be "like Melee", which honestly shows me that people who would want that horrible design added back into the game don't actually understand why Melee is so great. Hint: it's not the APM.
I think of Ultimate and the Melee style not as improvements but options. If you like Ultimate, you play Ultimate. If you like Melee, you play Melee. If you like both, you play both.

Also I love L Canceling.
THAT IS TENGAN TOPPA. THAT IS GURREN LAGANN! My drill is the drill that creates the heavens!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
538
#15
I know. I think of Ultimate and the Melee style not as improvements but options. If you like Ultimate, you play Ultimate. If you like Melee, you play Melee. If you like both, you play both. I was a Melee player, worse than Mango obviously, and I am asking for this minor change that affects nothing. What makes my opinion so much less valuable than Mango's? I'm a player too you know.

Who asks for it? I do, and it's part of the general process of even creating Project Ultimate, which will be made even if you don't want it to.
I understand the goal is simply to make Melee HD. But why not just make a better competitive Smash game than Melee, especially when you have almost two decades of hindsight to work with?

This is why I think anyone who works off of this mentality of simply making a carbon copy of Melee doesn't actually want an actually great competitive Smash game, they just want Melee. The goal in mind is rather skewed from my perspective. And I have a strange feeling that if it's not due to incompetence, it's due to either them not wanting to anger Melee fans when just by virtue of not being Melee, they won't play it, or they actually think Melee is the pinnacle of competitive game design in literally every respect. Or they simply don't know why Melee is a great competitive game and can discern the problems with the game as well as what works within it too and get rid of the former and keep the latter.

The most charitable and likely interpretation is the last one, which is why I feel like a "Project Ultimate" who's mission statement is simply to make Melee with Ultimate's roster doesn't actually understand why Melee is a great competitive game in the first place.
 

LunchmanJ

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Messages
206
#16
I understand the goal is simply to make Melee HD. But why not just make a better competitive Smash game than Melee, especially when you have almost two decades of hindsight to work with?

This is why I think anyone who works off of this mentality of simply making a carbon copy of Melee doesn't actually want an actually great competitive Smash game, they just want Melee. The goal in mind is rather skewed from my perspective. And I have a strange feeling that if it's not due to incompetence, it's due to either them not wanting to anger Melee fans when just by virtue of not being Melee, they won't play it, or they actually think Melee is the pinnacle of competitive game design in literally every respect. Or they simply don't know why Melee is a great competitive game and can discern the problems with the game as well as what works within it too and get rid of the former and keep the latter.

The most charitable and likely interpretation is the last one, which is why I feel like a "Project Ultimate" who's mission statement is simply to make Melee with Ultimate's roster doesn't actually understand why Melee is a great competitive game in the first place.
Oh. That actually makes sense lol. I just did not think of that. I think both options have their advantages. Doing a Melee clone would be easier, but doing that would just be better overall. Your option would be better if you can come up with easy enough changes to implement.

What do you suggest for changes?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
538
#17
Oh. That actually makes sense lol. I just did not think of that. I think both options have their advantages. Doing a Melee clone would be easier, but doing that would just be better overall. Your option would be better if you can come up with easy enough changes to implement.

What do you suggest for changes?
Basically this thread I made a while ago. Note that some minute things I have changed up, but the overall ideas I think are sound.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
12
#18
One moment, they want L-canceling to come back in its full manual form, but now that Ultimate gives low landing lag, nearly everyone proclaims L-canceling was garbage and never should have existed.
I can fully understand the disdain that some players' have for the mechanic in Vanilla Melee.

Despite that, I am in full support of the mechanic in every other Smash (And Emulated Melee) due to the ability to reconfigure our buttons.
I suffer from the early stages of rheumatoid arthritis and L-canceling with Non-GC Controllers or with buttons other than the shoulder ones cause me no additional pain.

I also have little interest in the but it's an extra button argument as it is not the only element of gameplay that is essentially making you do (Self-proclaimed) unnecessary work to achieve our desired output.


That was an interesting read. Thank you for showcasing some of your ideas.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
538
#20
I'm not sure what the deal is with this cutting characters thing. Seriously, what is the point of cutting characters in a MOD? It makes no sense. Better to get the creative juices flowing and make them interesting rather than just giving up.
 

LunchmanJ

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Messages
206
#21
I'm not sure what the deal is with this cutting characters thing. Seriously, what is the point of cutting characters in a MOD? It makes no sense. Better to get the creative juices flowing and make them interesting rather than just giving up.
Because OCD.

Also because you can't reinterpret all 70 characters in Ultimate.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
538
#22
Because OCD.

Also because you can't reinterpret all 70 characters in Ultimate.
Not with that attitude lol.

Also, I'm not sure you have to reinterpret everyone. Just add a few extra things or de-echo, but some are alright enough.

LunchmanJ LunchmanJ actually, have you seen my "Rework/Redesign" series of posts? They might be what you have in mind for this sort of thing.
 
Last edited:

LunchmanJ

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Messages
206
#23
Not with that attitude lol.

Also, I'm not sure you have to reinterpret everyone. Just add a few extra things or de-echo, but some are alright enough.

LunchmanJ LunchmanJ actually, have you seen my "Rework/Redesign" series of posts? They might be what you have in mind for this sort of thing.
Yeah, but I still kinda like using Melee as a base. It's really not that much worse, and is overall easier for the potential PMDT.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
6,152
Location
Miami, NYC
3DS FC
5129-1683-5306
NNID
NapoleonPlays
Switch FC
SW 3124 9647 8311
#24
I know. I think of Ultimate and the Melee style not as improvements but options. If you like Ultimate, you play Ultimate. If you like Melee, you play Melee. If you like both, you play both. I was a Melee player, worse than Mango obviously, and I am asking for this minor change that affects nothing. What makes my opinion so much less valuable than Mango's? I'm a player too you know.

Who asks for it? I do, and it's part of the general process of even creating Project Ultimate, which will be made even if you don't want it to.
THAT IS TENGAN TOPPA. THAT IS GURREN LAGANN! My drill is the drill that creates the heavens!
Personally (my perspective), its not that you cannot have an opinion, it's that the entire first post read as, even unintentionally, a bit obnoxious.

Allow me to explain-
For me at least, I was irritated by the word choice from the get go- continually referring to Ultimate as 'vanilla' in particular, rang offensively. Vanilla in this context is meant as a synonym for the word 'bland.' I actually find Melee to be much more bland- more movement, but ultimately, as the meme goes- Fox, final destination, no items.

Secondly, you mention in a few later posts how you 'mentioned such' in the OP. It's incredibly long, and when you tack on the ideas of your personal choice of characters, how I read it anyway, comes across as just a whine or a rant, rather than an idea that has any sense of plausibility. (This sounds a bit harsh, and I repeat I dont mean personal offense).

Lastly, adding back in entire mechanics of sluggishness just to then give a new ability to move-- well, it doesnt read well. It adds to the idea that this post was made for a game to revolve around you. And I get it- we all like what we like, and have preferences for how we would have things if we could. Maybe its that the post reads as an expectation that this is how it should be? I don't know. It rubs me the wrong way.
 

LunchmanJ

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Messages
206
#25
Personally (my perspective), its not that you cannot have an opinion, it's that the entire first post read as, even unintentionally, a bit obnoxious.

Allow me to explain-
For me at least, I was irritated by the word choice from the get go- continually referring to Ultimate as 'vanilla' in particular, rang offensively. Vanilla in this context is meant as a synonym for the word 'bland.' I actually find Melee to be much more bland- more movement, but ultimately, as the meme goes- Fox, final destination, no items.

Secondly, you mention in a few later posts how you 'mentioned such' in the OP. It's incredibly long, and when you tack on the ideas of your personal choice of characters, how I read it anyway, comes across as just a whine or a rant, rather than an idea that has any sense of plausibility. (This sounds a bit harsh, and I repeat I dont mean personal offense).

Lastly, adding back in entire mechanics of sluggishness just to then give a new ability to move-- well, it doesnt read well. It adds to the idea that this post was made for a game to revolve around you. And I get it- we all like what we like, and have preferences for how we would have things if we could. Maybe its that the post reads as an expectation that this is how it should be? I don't know. It rubs me the wrong way.
I'll edit my posts.
 
Last edited:
Top