That's still pretty much jumping to conclusions in terms of the personalities though. I guess the problem here though is their depiction in Smash Bros, rather than their depiction in their own games, where Marth and Roy have virtually the same personality. (Where the problem seems to be depicted as more feminine. In any case with the made up personalities, Ike kind of usurped your idea for Roy.
Actually, what this reminds me a lot of is Captain Falcon, who seems to have a different personality (or preceived to have a different personality) in Smash than the one he has in F-Zero.
How do you not see their personalities. Heck, you keep referring back to the other games so much it makes me wonder if you even play Smash Bros.
My main argument is that Fire Emblem shouldn't keep on having the same type of character. Its not a want of lances, axes, mages, and what not, its a diswant of another sword users from Fire Emblem, or at least the same type of sword user (Lyn probably wouldn't fight that way...but Lyn's probably not getting in anyways, so disregard this) The series should be expanded, instead of having three characters who are virtually the same, outside some fairly insignificant differences. Quite frankly, I'd be fine if the FE series only stays with Ike and Marth, and doesn't get a new character, since that will still be better than overloading the franchise with more of the same.
Yes, because two characters wielding a sword is SO much the same. You need to understand that the sword is a very complex weapon. There are a heck of a lot of different kinds of swords from different cultures are well as fighting styles. One sword is not the same as another. This is why Smash has so many varied sword fighters.
I don't think a analogy about a lost dog is quite apt since we can only assume that the girl liked her dog for her special bond that they developed together. It'd be more apt to put in say a doll, since any bond that's generated between the girl and the doll would be more akin to any that a player would generate between themself and Roy. In any case, it still stands that most connections that these average fans have is created by the aethetics of Roy, rather than Roy himself, and thus he can be replaced, since despite your analogy, there isn't that much emotional attachment. Of course some will still complain, but everyone complains about everything in these types of games, since no one's dream roster will be perfect. Plus, its not like there's a overwhelimg majority of people who want Roy, since I'm pretty sure that most of Smash fans don't really care. Its just those vocal few who don't aren't really that big into Fire Emblem, yet still seemed to develop a attachment to Roy instead of being indifferent like most are. Even Mewtwo, who clearly has more people complaining about him, is pretty unlikely, as the fanbase is mostly confined to message boards. Of course this makes me wonder what exactly the Japanese stance on Roy's cut was, since their fan base is almost certainly the one that could push in these types of characters through.
I'm saying if fan demand was high enough, then Roy would have gotten in anyways, since he would have been priority. Look at Falco. He was a clone who had enough fan popularity that he got in despite the fact that there was a new character added. (And it speaks even more for him, since the new character pushed in was a clone as well) Also, while its true that I doubt that many were expecting Doc, Pichu, and especially MC, I do remember what it was like Pre-Brawl, and more people were expecting Geno than Roy, even though Geno's inclusion made no sense. (Heck, near the end, I think the only one who was expected more than Geno was Ridley, and we know how all that turned out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Urg :urg: :urg:"
)
Do we have to prove fan demand to you.
Look, if any other character was cut, people would have reacted the same way. They'd be upset, like they are now. Truth is, we don't know why they were cut. The evidence, however, points to that they were in the final project, but were removed so that Sonic and his stuff could be done without having to delay the game forever (they were already behind squeal it seems). Your making a claim with no fact. You only assume that Roy didn't come back because he wasn't popular enough. Remember: Assume is ***=u+me
Yes, most lords havn't really don't many important things outside of their one game, with the exception of Ike and Marth who had multiple ones, but Roy falls into that mass of other lords that you just put down. In his own series, Roy hasn't done anything in his own series, at least by your definition of it.
Do I REALLY have to repost
No, you don't know what important means.
marked by or indicative of significant worth or consequence from here
So, the character must have some indicated kind of worth. We can't use story because Fire Emblem, like Final Fantasy, is not continuous. While some games move into one another, most are independent. Since all the lords are the main character, they are all important to the story.
How else may they be important then. Why, they may be important to the franchise. Guess what, Melee is what made FE possible here. People wanted FE because people like Marth and Roy. Since Roy helped to popularize Fire Emblem by being playable in Melee, he has worth, thus, he is important. When a new FE game comes out the question always is "Is Marth or Roy in this game." People thought Elwood was Roy when they say the box for FE7. People were very upset when Roy was taken out of Brawl.
By definition, he is important. To deny his importance is to not understand the definition of importance.
Then it shouldn't matter at all who they include, since the FE game won't matter that much, thus they should please the fans by putting someone who better at expanding the series. It won't bother the average person, since it doesn't matter to them, according to you.
Or how about they don't add another FE character. Why does no one explore that alternative.
Also, to bold, who do the fans want. Oh, that's right. ROY
Uh...because you tell him more than "I like Moltres. :3" I guess? That's how those letters went anyways. Plus given that Pokemon is a bigger franchise than Smash isn't that kind of like saying "I like doughnuts :3" and Sakurai not being able to tell if you like the doughnut food item in smash, or the actual food? (Plus, Moltres is pretty bad for a legendary in Brawl. Why would you like him because of his apperance there?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9d93/f9d93f9a7ef6a0337876bcd172e601739002dc70" alt="Psycho :psycho: :psycho:"
)
What?
Again, its not these type of people that the roster should be generated for. Marth and Roy don't even exist in the same universe. Given the total disregard to each of their characters, I don't see the problem at all with cutting one, and adding another, since the people are just generating stuff in their head.
So, let me get this straight. The roster is not suppose to be generated for Smash fans? The who should it be for?
If this responce is confusing, it's becuase it is. It doesn't even relate to Toise's post
And no, Marth doesn't convey "the Fire Emblem effect" well enough on his own. People don't write "Fire Emblem was localized because Marth was in Melee." It's "Marth and Roy." Everywhere on every website that has a description. "Are Marth and Roy in this one?" People want them both. My brother used to say "so basically, Roy is Fire and Marth is Emblem, and they fight crime." You can't have one without the other and assume people will accept it. They're bound to eachother forever.
You've lost like 10 pages back. I didn't even have to try and counter your arguments, they are just to easy. You have this weird idea that you base your argument around, but not once have you defined why that your idea is a idea of reason and should be followed. Or, in simpler terms, why your idea makes sense.