View attachment 278732
From a historic standpoint? I'm certainly inclined to agree. From a current relevance standpoint? Not in the slightest.
Ninja Gaiden's last release was a critical and commercial flop in 2014. It's been radio silence since then.
You can't deny the fact that while Atelier has never performed the best,
at least it's still going as a series.
Smash could be just the push the series needs to truly break out, much like one of the prominent reasons for Hero's inclusion. While it certainly goes against popular fan consensus, the fact is that it'd be a pragmatic business decision to include Atelier over Ninja Gaiden.
Call it shilling or whatever, but Nintendo is a company with corporate interests; of course they're going to cater to those first. They don't personally serve any of us.
That's a good point, but Mega Man also had year's worth of
overwhelming fan demand. I'd honestly say he was more requested by far over the likes of Ridley, K. Rool, and Banjo.
Comparatively, discussion on Ryu started what? Like, 6, 7 months ago? Back when he started showing up in "leaks" as FP4, FP5, FP6, etc. His fan demand is rather steady right now, but it's nowhere
near the astounding demand surrounding Mega Man.
Which is why I don't know whether or not Ryu has a definitive edge over the Atelier series.
Because your subjective, personal discussions reflect perfectly on the wider landscape of the gaming industry.
Atelier is very much in a similar position to Bayonetta when she was added to Sm4sh. Anyone saying otherwise wasn't around to see the fallout of Bayonetta's addition and is basing their perspective on now, when resentment has boiled over and views on Bayonetta have shifted significantly in her favor.