Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Based on match-ups alone, starter lists should look like this:@Brawl:
1) What do you guys think about testing a 3 stage starter list? ~ Yoshi's Island/Battlefield/Animal Crossing?
Pokemon Stadium 1 is a much more legit starter. It is much more balanced (Starters are supposed to be as neutral as possible) and is a much deeper stage.2) What do you guys think about Final Destination as a starter over Pokemon Stadium 1?
If you're going to have it, you should also have some other borderline stage to counter it's influence, like Green Greens3) What do you guys think about Pictochat?
Camping below the fin is an incredibly advantageous position. Given the general lay-out, it is also a strong counter-pick for Fox. Stronger than any pick for any other character (unless you include Mute City for Puff/Peach).@Melee:
Opinions on Corneria?
That is based on raw match-up data, so actually, they are.There's no way PS2 and Lylat are both better starters than Battlefield
You legend.I'm a big advocate for more starters, purely because it allows greater option (even if 90% of the time it'll go to smashville regardless of how many starters there are ). I'm not experienced with a three-starter scenario, so personal opinion is as much as I can offer.
Still a legend.I'd love it, but only in a 5 or 7 list. I can elaborate on this if need be, but I'll leave it as personal opinion for now and see if I'm horribly outnumbered rendering my vote useless :D
This is very true.Just to note
3 Starters is working backwards more than anything.
The starters are supposed to give the fairest match-up for the first game, and it's very hard to do that with only 3 stages. 7 stages is a really good number, basically the seven grim said above maybe with Frigate replaced by Yoshi's.
FD is not a starter stage. Shouldn't be, anyways. It is, quite simply, one of the most polar stages ever. I went down from S tier to D tier and found 2 characters who find the stage neutral in more than a small handful of matchups. FD is a hardcore counterpick. It's very rare that one of the two players doesn't ban it, that's how polar it is. It's literally about on the level with Rainbow Cruise or Brinstar as far as matchup polarization goes.
Mr. Game & Watch would be pretty bummed about that.All we need is one starter.
Smashville!
I tried a 7 list with Castle Siege back in December - it was -always- struckI left Castle Siege and PS2 off the starter list because I don't think you guys are quite ready for that yet
And Ice Climbers would be overjoyed.Mr. Game & Watch would be pretty bummed about that.
Oh, fair enough then. I've never tested with the stage, so that was just theory-craft based on what various character boards have said.I tried a 7 list with Castle Siege back in December - it was -always- struck
Unless they are playing against wolf, oh J-birds where you currently locatedAnd Ice Climbers would be overjoyed.
Well then you'd most likely also have a transformation that helps your character, so it evens out more than anything.Everyone struck it because there's 3 transformations, and it's very tough for all three of them to be favourable to your character in any match-up. If you think about it, you got almost all stage variations appearing at some point in that stage (short of moving platforms of course), and thus unless you already have a 70:30 MU against your opponent's character then you're giving them an advantage at some point in the match that they otherwise wouldn't have had on a different stage that you can counterpick. It's not a bad stage, but it's rarely ever going to get picked over stages that are consistently favourable to a character.
It evens it out somewhat, but when you've got a choice of giving your opponent an advantage for some of the match or playing on a much more neutral option for a starter, most people choose the latter. Even if someone doesn't choose the latter, the other person probably will, resulting in it being struck anyway Smashville FTWWell then you'd most likely also have a transformation that helps your character, so it evens out more than anything.
I'd imagine it's because there are already three predominantly flat stages on the list, adding FD as a fourth is pretty unbalanced. Changing FD for Lylat will results in most matches going to SV first up, as there are 2 platformy stages and 2 flat stages, with SV being the middle ground so to speak. TBH I don't think I've ever seen Lylat or FD played as the starter stage in a tournament set that wasn't a ditto.1) I'd like to see a five stage starter list, just for a little more variety. Ideally SV, BF, FD, YI and PS1, although i figure FD will probs be substituted for lylat, although i'm still unsure why.
I don't know the last time anyone in QLD in the past year has played first match on Lylat.Lylat Cruise.
I can't guarantee that it won't be struck as much, but I can say that the game will be more likely to end up on the fairest stage for the match-up.EDIT: Wait, yes I can. I personally guarantee it won't be struck as often or as quickly as FD over-all.