• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Julian Assange granted asylum in Ecuadorian Embassy

Pluvia

Hates Semicolons<br>;
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
7,677
Location
Mass Effect Thread
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19281492

Ecuador has granted asylum to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange two months after he took refuge in its London embassy while fighting extradition from the UK.

It said his human rights might be violated if he is sent to Sweden to be questioned over sex assault claims.

Foreign Secretary William Hague said the UK would not allow Mr Assange safe passage out of the country and the move was also criticised by Stockholm.

Ecuador said it would seek to negotiate arrangements for Mr Assange to leave.

"We don't think it is reasonable that, after a sovereign government has made the decision of granting political asylum, a citizen is forced to live in an embassy for a long period," Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino said.

Mr Assange took refuge at the embassy in June to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he faces questioning over assault and **** claims, which he denies.

Mr Patino had accused the UK of making an "open threat" to enter its embassy to arrest Mr Assange, an Australian national.

Mr Assange said being granted political asylum by Ecuador was a "significant victory" and thanked staff in the Ecuadorean embassy in London.

However, as the Foreign Office insisted the decision would not affect the UK's legal obligation to extradite him to Sweden, Mr Assange warned: "Things will get more stressful now."

"It was not Britain or my home country, Australia, that stood up to protect me from persecution, but a courageous, independent Latin American nation," said Mr Assange, who watched the announcement with embassy staff in a live link to a press conference in Quito.

"While today is a historic victory, our struggles have just begun. The unprecedented US investigation against Wikileaks must be stopped.

"While today much of the focus will be on the decision of the Ecuadorean government, it is just as important that we remember Bradley Manning has been detained without trial for over 800 days," he said, referring to the former US soldier accused of leaking government material to Wikileaks.

Mr Assange is expected to make a statement in front of the embassy on Sunday at 14:00 BST, according to the Wikileaks Twitter feed.
'Legal obligation'

Announcing Ecuador's decision, Mr Patino launched a strong attack on the UK for what he said was an "explicit type of blackmail".

The UK Foreign Office had warned, in a note, that it could lift the embassy's diplomatic status to fulfil a "legal obligation" to extradite the 41-year-old by using the Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act 1987.

That allows the UK to revoke the diplomatic status of an embassy on UK soil, which would potentially allow police to enter the building to arrest Mr Assange for breaching the terms of his bail.

Mr Hague said it was a "matter of regret" that the Ecuadorean government decided to grant Mr Assange political asylum but warned that it "does not change the fundamentals" of the case.

He also warned that it could drag on for some "considerable" time.

"We will not allow Mr Assange safe passage out of the United Kingdom, nor is there any legal basis for us to do so," he said.

Mr Hague said there was "no threat" to storm the embassy.

"We are talking about an Act of Parliament in this country which stresses that it must be used in full conformity with international law," he said.

Mr Patino said Ecuador believed Mr Assange's fears of political persecution were "legitimate" and said his country was being loyal to its tradition of protecting those who were vulnerable.

He later told BBC Mundo that conditions were attached to the asylum.

"We placed the same type of conditions that are the norm in international relations, such as him [Mr Assange] not making political statements that could affect our relations with friendly countries."

The Foreign Office said it was "disappointed" by the Ecuador statement and said it remained committed to reaching a "negotiated solution" that would allow it to carry out its "obligations under the Extradition Act". This means Mr Assange's arrest would still be sought if he left the embassy.
Sweden summons ambassador

The Swedish government reacted angrily to Mr Patino's suggestion that Mr Assange would not be treated fairly by its justice system, summoning Ecuador's ambassador to explain.

"The accusations... are serious, and it is unacceptable that Ecuador would want to halt the Swedish judicial process and European judicial co-operation," said Anders Joerle, spokesman for the Swedish foreign ministry.

The Organisation of American States called a special meeting at its Washington headquarters on Thursday to discuss the Ecuador-UK relationship, specifically Ecuador's diplomatic premises in the UK.

The Union of South American Nations, meanwhile, has convened an "extraordinary meeting" in Ecuador on Sunday to consider "the situation raised at the embassy".

Mr Assange entered the embassy after the UK's Supreme Court dismissed his bid to reopen his appeal against extradition and gave him a two-week grace period before extradition proceedings could start.

It was during that fortnight, while on bail, that he sought refuge.

A subsequent offer by Ecuador to allow Swedish investigators to interview Mr Assange inside the embassy was rejected.

The Wikileaks website Mr Assange founded published a mass of leaked diplomatic cables that embarrassed several governments, particularly that of the US, in 2010.

Mr Assange says he fears that if extradited to Sweden, he will then be passed on to the American authorities.

In 2010, two female ex-Wikileaks volunteers accused Mr Assange of committing sexual offences against them while he was in Stockholm to give a lecture.

Mr Assange claims the sex was consensual and the allegations are politically motivated.
To get this out of the way before it comes up, these **** allegations happened 3 months before the massive Wikileaks scandal on November 28th, which was announced by Wikileaks on November 22nd.

I see what Assange is doing as an attempt to hide from court by using conspiracy theories and his fame to muddle up the facts with his unrelated Wikileaks activities which happened after these allegations. He should go to Sweden and answer for these allegations if he has nothing to hide.
 

~ Gheb ~

Life is just a party
Joined
Jun 27, 2008
Messages
16,916
Location
Europe
I see what Assange is doing as an attempt to hide from court by using conspiracy theories and his fame to muddle up the facts with his unrelated Wikileaks activities which happened after these allegations. He should go to Sweden and answer for these allegations if he has nothing to hide.
The problem is that Sweden cannot guarantee that they won't turn Assange over to the USA, where he will likely receive a death penalty for his Wikileaks activities. As long as this is the case Assange can rightfully claim that his percecution is politically motivated. Whether he would actually show up to the process if Sweden *could* guarantee to not turn him over to the USA is a different question but as long as such a guarantee doesn't exist it will not matter anyway.

:059:
 

Pluvia

Hates Semicolons<br>;
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
7,677
Location
Mass Effect Thread
The problem is that Sweden cannot guarantee that they won't turn Assange over to the USA, where he will likely receive a death penalty for his Wikileaks activities. As long as this is the case Assange can rightfully claim that his percecution is politically motivated. Whether he would actually show up to the process if Sweden *could* guarantee to not turn him over to the USA is a different question but as long as such a guarantee doesn't exist it will not matter anyway.

:059:
He can't be sent from Sweden to the US if he has a chance of being charged with the death penalty, it's against the EU, so if he goes to Sweden there's a 0% chance of him recieving the death penalty.

Also, the US hasn't called for him to be extradited at all.
 

Mic_128

Wake up...
Administrator
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
46,183
Location
Steam
He can't be sent from Sweden to the US if he has a chance of being charged with the death penalty, it's against the EU, so if he goes to Sweden there's a 0% chance of him recieving the death penalty.
Of course, that doesn't mean he wouldn't face life imprisonment, or simply be held without trial.

Also, the US hasn't called for him to be extradited at all.
Well of course not. If they had, then there would be increased pressure to keep him out of Sweden. If they don't call him to be extradited until he's actually over there, then they're obligated to pass him on. It's a bit like walking into a tigers cage under the grounds that 'they didn't say they were going to maul me' but once you're in there, it's too late.
 

Pluvia

Hates Semicolons<br>;
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
7,677
Location
Mass Effect Thread
Thing is he can't avoid these accusations on some hypothetical situation created by his conspiracy theories.

Simply put, running Wikileaks doesn't make him above the law, and he should go face these.
 

Mic_128

Wake up...
Administrator
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
46,183
Location
Steam
Considering the info he's got access to, he's pretty likely to know what's going on.
 

Pluvia

Hates Semicolons<br>;
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
7,677
Location
Mass Effect Thread
Calling them conspiracy theories doesn't make them any less realistic.
Conspiracy theories to a hypothetical future situation. His life isn't in danger, and even in his hypothetical future situation it still isn't.

AKA not a reason to avoid the law.
 

~ Gheb ~

Life is just a party
Joined
Jun 27, 2008
Messages
16,916
Location
Europe
Well, apparently Sweden has confirmed that they won't hand Assange over to the USA in case his life is in danger there.

:059:
 

Claire Diviner

President
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
7,476
Location
Indian Orchard, MA
NNID
ClaireDiviner
Can the U.S. really implement the death penalty to a foreigner for leaking info that merely embarrasses them? I mean, did they say the leaked info contained codes to the government mainframe or something? I'm not exactly sure what "diplomatic cables" are.
 

Pluvia

Hates Semicolons<br>;
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
7,677
Location
Mass Effect Thread
Well, apparently Sweden has confirmed that they won't hand Assange over to the USA in case his life is in danger there.

:059:
Not exactly, you're making it sound like they made a special case for Assange, when it's actually in the EU to protect people from being extradited if there's a possibility they face the death penalty or torture.

Which doesn't make any difference here, as the US hasn't called for extradition that's just a future hypothetical situation, and Assange is probably already fully aware of EU laws, yet he still continues to hide and not face his charges.
 

Froggy

Smash Champion
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Messages
2,448
3DS FC
3110-7430-0100
Can the U.S. really implement the death penalty to a foreigner for leaking info that merely embarrasses them? I mean, did they say the leaked info contained codes to the government mainframe or something? I'm not exactly sure what "diplomatic cables" are.
I don't know as much as I'd like to about these kind of laws, but I don't think the U.S. should have to the right to execute any foreigner regardless of their crimes. It's fine if they want to kill their own citizens but I can't understand how anyone can think it's ok for the government to kill someone who isn't a citizen of their state.
 

~ Gheb ~

Life is just a party
Joined
Jun 27, 2008
Messages
16,916
Location
Europe
I don't know as much as I'd like to about these kind of laws, but I don't think the U.S. should have to the right to execute any foreigner regardless of their crimes. It's fine if they want to kill their own citizens but I can't understand how anyone can think it's ok for the government to kill someone who isn't a citizen of their state.
Since when does it matter to the US government what 'rights' they have? Last time I checked, they never had the right to torture prisoners, to install dictatorships in foreign countries or to provide equipment for foreign armies to commit genocide. If Assange is turned over to the USA he is a dead man for sure.

:059:
 

Shorts

Zef Side
Premium
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
9,609
3DS FC
3136-6583-3704
Since when does it matter to the US government what 'rights' they have? Last time I checked, they never had the right to torture prisoners, to install dictatorships in foreign countries or to provide equipment for foreign armies to commit genocide. If Assange is turned over to the USA he is a dead man for sure.

:059:
I don't think it would be AS EASY to kill him simply based on how much attention he has gotten internationally. Would be a lot harder to sneak him off the radar, and torture/kill him than most, I would say.
 
Top Bottom