Houston Thread - No HOBOs and no WHOBOs. What do we do now??????????????????????????????????????????

[Tesh]

Go away Bio.

 

[Sinister Slush]

I swear, you're trying to get yourself banned again or something.
You can't be serious about this whole ****.

 

[KRDsonic]

You're linking the same site over and over.

 

[Gea]

I'm writing it up now, but you need to understand that many of those links don't... you know what nevermind I'll get to it. Give me about an hour to format, cite some sources and try to not have any glaring issues.

 

[heytallman]

I'm waiting to jack it tonight for Gea to post his essay. Then I'll likely spank my dragon to said essay.

 

[Espy Rose]

Tallman and I think alike.

 

[RT]

It seems the letter was ignored.

The brain cells have now committed suicide.

 

[Sinister Slush]

Since the discussion is about penis.
GaW what say you about Dragon Dildos to pleasure your poop chute. Does that relieve all the symptoms you've posted about earlier?

 

[Zano]

I was about to fap but I think I'll wait for that post by Gea til i do

 

[Mr. game and watch]

>posts scientific reasoning, evidences, and studies explaining why porn/masturbation addiction is bad for you
>idiot for thinking porn/masturbation addiction is bad for you






If I post 10 links and give examples of why and how gravity exists, logic has it that I am not ignorant for believing that gravity exists.

 

[heytallman]

But gravity does exist.

 

[Mr. game and watch]

But porn/masturbation addiction is bad for you.

 

[Maharba the Mystic]

300,000+ subs on that subreddit can attest to feeling these symptoms. I can as well to some symptoms, not everyone will get them all though.
But fine ignore reddit, just focus on the yourbrainonporn.com

If studies of groups of 100,000's of people are not reliable then I guess I'm a dumdum and everything I'm saying is wrong.
But since what I'm showing you is, by definition, scientifically reliable, then I'm probably right.

Don't just say "I see reddit so your scientific evidence is irrelevant." because that's ignorant, prejudiced, and closed-minded.

that's not science. that's 100,000 emo kids who just admitted that fap while hating themselves while they do things that ACTUALLY lower ur testosterone like cutting themself, being depressed all the time, and taking pills. these things are why emos have a hard time later on in life getting the ****in **** hard. not because they fapped as kids.


***** god dam 16 year olds. i hate how schools try to teach them sex and fapping is immoral and wrong nowadays and then they try to teach people who already learned this **** the right way that they are wrong.

**** man in my sex ed class the teacher used to always joke (while remaining serious) that we men should fap more to keep healthy (not fapping enough is actually related to acne problems, stress/anxiety, and random unwanted hard ons believe it or not)

i hate dumb kids.

i don't know i may just be being a dcik about this

 

[Gea]

Let me preface by making two things very clear. Since this isn't a proper paper I'm going to be doing citations and quotes a bit differently to accommodate SWF, and since this is in direct response to a post expect direct address of the audience. Also, too much of anything is bad for you. This in no way means any amount is bad for you. A man rubbing his corndog until it loses all the breading is obviously not in his best interest and it may be signs that he is suffering from other issues in his life. However, this in no way invalidates the benefits of a man cleaning his rifle on a regular basis. Keeping this brief, the important things to know are the validity of the sources presented for both sides, the benefits of regularly giving oneself the secret handshake, and why some believe slamming the salami is bad for a man's health.

Upon inspection of the evidence presented as counter-arguments, there are some concerns about the sources given. If you get all of your information from sources that have an agenda, you are likely to not get the whole picture. As iffy as they are, places like wikipedia are actually great starting resources for a journey to the truth, because they generally show both sides with citations that hopefully lead to scientific studies published in medical journals under peer review. While some of the articles linked do have published academic backing, many others are anecdotal, sensationalist and most do not directly support the claim that a person should, “fap once a month max” or even address the subject matter at all. A website devoted towards a message of abstaining from internet pornography is not a congruent source.

Citing a TEDx talk is similarly tricky. The difference between TED and TEDx talks. TED talks are about spreading ideas that are scientifically backed through research and practice. TED is about summing up engaging academic ideas and the bar is pretty high for official talks. TEDx are talks that are run by independent organizations about anything they want. The quality level and discussions are more or less set by the organizers and not TED. There are many talks that have no scientific background and are steeped more in observation of culture or desire to change culture. The talk was not even anti-yogurt tossing, it was anti-pornography which is a whole different discussion. In the future it is recommended you find the academic studies that directly support the author's thesis and look at them to ensure the author is not manipulating data to support a predrawn conclusion. The video has the speaker blaming his procrastination and depression over his internet pornography addiction, not about how normal intervals of tenderizing his skirt steak negatively impacted his health in a quantifiable way.

Taking a look at one of the links posted from the speaker's website that cites a study talking about how over-exertion sexually can cause a result that can be compared to a hangover. Upon actually reading the article it is revealed that surprise, these results are caused by copulation and the effects are significantly lessened by one going full throttle alone, by four times or more. It turns out nature expected man to brine his pickle and evolved accordingly. The article then goes on to be a mash-up hinging on anecdotal evidence and linking to other places on the same website to ignore this and support a cause not directly ever stated in the cited study. The website is spanking the monkey in a very unscientific way.

Your sources aside, there is heavy evidence pointing in the direction that regular banana peeling is healthy. For example, the prostate:

There was no association of prostate cancer with the number of sexual partners or with the maximum number of ejaculations in 24 h. There was a negative trend (P < 0.01) for the association between risk and number of ejaculations in the third decade, independent of those in the fourth or fifth. Men who averaged five or more ejaculations weekly in their 20s had an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.66 (0.49–0.87) compared with those who ejaculated less often.The null association with the number of sexual partners argues against infection as a cause of prostate cancer in this population. Ejaculatory frequency, especially in early adult life, is negatively associated with the risk of prostate cancer, and thus the molecular biological consequences of suppressed or diminished ejaculation are worthy of further research.

To put this very plainly a peer reviewed study find that while there may not be any benefit for multiple sessions of chicken choking in a single day, there is benefit for frequent release, and very important. Prostate cancer is one of the highest causes of death in men over 50. The entire idea that polishing your pole is negative is a cultural idea that goes against nature itself. Orangutans make sex toys for themselves, and it is common for children of even preschool ages to exhibit signs of genital manipulation when under stress. There are cave paintings of the act. There are indeed religions, philosophies, and places in the world that do not condone the acts of tissue genocide, but the reality is that most humans take part in it. Surveys and studies show that 61% of males in the United States admit to whittling their wood. (The study: Das, A. "Masturbation in the United States," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy (2007) 33:301.) Other studies (according to Men's Health magazine) show that up to 90% of men and 89% of women partake in mashing their mangos. There are lots of other benefits such as daily relief leads to more fertile men, BBC reported that it is shown to boost the immune system, and there are lots of reports about the effects on stress, and even some theories about how it can combat allergies or alleviate swelling and inflammation in other places of the body.

Of course not every study is going to show positive things for squeaking your gerbil. Some studies show a lowering of testosterone, though the reality is this is extremely temporary and makes sense if you understand the physiology behind spinning a sloppy web. Most naysayers either have a cultural reason or are against pornographic addiction and the problems that arise with obsessive horn-tooting. The act is usually a sign of other issues and stretching the taffy once a day is not a sign of addiction or serious issue. Citations of limp noodles and depression are not rooted in keeping your hands on your mars bar, but a combination of other life issues compounded. If reduction of activity helps the issue to some degree it makes sense because testosterone will spike and nature takes over to try and get the man to procreate. Just as many studies show that regular guitar strumming help depression, increase focus and reduce ED because it keeps the body regular and not immediately seeking relief. Websites that you seem to adore are not focused on the elimination of putting hair on your chest and palms, but on finding excuses and pointing fingers at overstimulation caused by people obsessing over pornography which is easier to obtain.

And yeah, I got lazy citing stuff near the end but since I'm no longer in college getting access to databases of articles is slightly harder.

The point is you're a tool for not hammering some nails every now and then just because some dude who was previously addicted to brazzers got mad when he realized he was paying several grand a year on internet poontang and saw more proactive things to do with his time.

 

[Gea]

I'm sure there are some typos and I could go even more into detail but you know what, for the effort you squeaked out of your buttscheek I think that's more than passable as a response. Also you aren't on 4chan or a BBS, using less than symbols is not quoting, we have tags for that.

 

[heytallman]

 

[heytallman]

Just read it. Good post. It made me want to read an essay about the Crusades.

Hope that post was enlightening, GW.

LATER, LOSERS

 

[Espy Rose]

Best read today.

 

[Player-4]

Alright, enough fap talk >.>

 

[UltimateRazer]

Wow look what I found....

God why did I look so bad in 09.. LOL
Razer looks like a kid.

3000 tho.

The 3 TX Gods.

LOL flip wtf was that 09 look you had? I had that kid buu swag.

 

[Zano]

I will never read a greater post in my life, ty Gea, I know how to celebrate this occasion.

 

[Gea]

 

[Mr. game and watch]

k my turn brb with counter-argument


also ">" is definitely a greater-than symbol.

 

[Gea]

You're right, I wasn't thinking when I posted less than. The point stands.

 

[Paw]

w at

 

[Espy Rose]

Could you please just stop G&W?
Please?

No one wants to hear it. No one cares to hear it since Gea pretty much summed it all up.
Just leave the thread? Or leave the topic be?
Seriously.

 

[Trela]

MMMMMMM, this ignore list tastes SO good.

You guys want a piece?

 

[Xyro77]

You were warned , Mr GW. The wang ninjas are inbound. May god have have mercy on your happy place.

 

[Sinister Slush]

 

[ToferTheHuman]

MMMMMMM, this ignore list tastes SO good.

You guys want a piece?

It's like eating bacon cheesburger pizza.

 

[heytallman]

Not on. ~Mic

 

[Player-4]

Everyone behave

 

[Espy Rose]

"Everyone" is not how you type "G&W", P4.

 

[UltimateRazer]

Bro do you even lift?

 

[Player-4]

"Everyone" is not how you type "G&W", P4.

GW isn't the only one being dumb

 

[Sinister Slush]

Probably something along the lines of editing Xyro's posts twice (typical screamer and **** teeth brushing) G&W and us responding to the troll.

So more than one person.

 

[Player-4]

What Slush said

 

[Espy Rose]

I still disagree.

 

[heytallman]

I got infracted by mic the dic for a post that wasn't even bad.

And he didn't even respond to my PM.

 

[ToferTheHuman]

Mic and John are the worst ones.