• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Georgia Parents Torture Adopted Daughter, Say They Were Just Following The Bible

Claire Diviner

President
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
7,476
Location
Indian Orchard, MA
NNID
ClaireDiviner
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/07/13/georgia-parents-torture-adopted-daughter-say-they-were-just-following-the-bible/

If there was ever a case that proves once and for all why the Bible has never been and should never be the basis for American law, this is it.

Diana and Samuel Franklin are the adoptive parents of a 15 year old girl. And they never should have been allowed to adopt any child whatsoever. Over the last two years, the Franklins have been torturing the girl by locking her up in a chicken coop for days, locking her in a small claustrophobic outhouse, and forcing her to wear a shock collar controlled by a remote. Authorities also found a leather belt that may have been used to beat the girl.

Why did they do this? The Georgia parents allegedly did these horrible things to teach the girl how to do chores correctly; chores such as picking up trash and tending to the yard in extremely hot conditions. And what’s worse, according to a neighbor, the parents allegedly claim they were just following the Bible.


WTVM reports that one neighbor said that,

“Diana Franklin would often punish her daughter for not doing chores and working the “right way.” The neighbor said that Diana Franklin would only feed her daughter bread and water as punishment for days on end. The neighbor says that Diana Franklin told her that she was “doing what the Bible says.”

Diana Franklin faces 12 counts of cruelty to children and 4 counts of false imprisonment, while Samuel Franklin faces 8 counts of cruelty to children and 8 counts of false imprisonment. Weeks before their arrests, the girl was taken into temporary custody by the Department of Family and Child Services.”

This isn’t the first time parents have used God or the Bible to justify the way they brutally deal with their children. Just last year, fundamentalist Christian parents were arrested for spanking their child to death in the name of God. These are the same fundamentalist Christians who would love nothing more than to declare Christianity the national religion and replace the Constitution with what they interpret as Biblical law. Cruel punishment of children is common in the Bible. From beatings to stonings, it is indeed there. But the fact is, in American culture, this is wrong, and it’s precisely why we have a separation of church and state. It’s why the Bible is most certainly NOT the basis for American law. But Christian fundamentalists such as those on the Christian right want incidents such as these to be legal and protected under the guise of religious freedom. Being cruel and committing violence on behalf of God or because a book says so doesn’t make it right. It makes those who would commit such acts dangerous to our laws, our culture, and to the human population. As I said at the start, if there was ever a reason to insist that religion be separate from government and that religion stay out of laws made by government, it is this one. Because it is clear that fanatical religion poses a serious threat not only to adults, but to our children as well.
This... this is giving me diabetes. Don't ask how.
 

Master Xanthan

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
2,756
Location
New Jersey
This is pretty horrible, hopefully the parents go to prison for life at the very least. However, I disagree with the last paragraph saying that Christian Fundamentalists want torture to be legal.
 

Claire Diviner

President
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
7,476
Location
Indian Orchard, MA
NNID
ClaireDiviner
This is pretty horrible, hopefully the parents go to prison for life at the very least. However, I disagree with the last paragraph saying that Christian Fundamentalists want torture to be legal.
Yeah, just remember that this is quoted from the report, and not every article I post necessarily reflect my views and opinions.
People with no religion/belief in a god commit crimes too, and I don't need a citation for that.
That goes without saying. It just disgusts me when the religious ones use "God" as their reasoning, as if that will make things any better. If anything, it just worsens their image, especially to those who view them badly enough as is.
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
^If you want to get technical, people do commit crimes in the name of ___. Love, anger, drugs, religion, money, greed, self defense, etc. It's just rarely stated in a verbal manner.

Honestly, the only people I would excuse in terms of crimes without proper identification are the "crazies." I still don't think anyone has figured out why that one man attacked a homeless, and nearly ate his face off.
 

Claire Diviner

President
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
7,476
Location
Indian Orchard, MA
NNID
ClaireDiviner
I can see the self-defense argument being viable, assuming the murderer in question was really in a life-threatening situation. As for the other things, like money, anger, love, etc., the thing those have in common is that unlike religion, they're most of the time not used as an argument to justify the crime in an attempt to seek sympathy.
 

theeboredone

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
12,398
Location
Houston, TX
When you make the decision to punish/inflict crimes on someone, you are essentially justifying your reason behind "X". There's no sympathy involved in that matter.

In this article, the neighbor claims Diana did this, because the Bible told her too. At the time of her crimes, she was not looking for sympathy. She was just following whatever segments of the Bible she had read. Maybe she is now after she got caught, but when the crime was committed, I can only doubt that she was looking for sympathy. If anything, because she was "following" the Bible, she would consider herself "right".

Also, on a total side note. This was happening for 2 years? At what point did the neighbor (or anyone else) come across this information? Shouldn't these people be held accountable if they had known this had been happening for quite a while?
 

Claire Diviner

President
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
7,476
Location
Indian Orchard, MA
NNID
ClaireDiviner
When you make the decision to punish/inflict crimes on someone, you are essentially justifying your reason behind "X". There's no sympathy involved in that matter.

In this article, the neighbor claims Diana did this, because the Bible told her too. At the time of her crimes, she was not looking for sympathy. She was just following whatever segments of the Bible she had read. Maybe she is now after she got caught, but when the crime was committed, I can only doubt that she was looking for sympathy. If anything, because she was "following" the Bible, she would consider herself "right".
I suppose you're right about that. Still, using religion and/or the Bible to justify murder is as viable as greed, love, etc., which is to say, not viable at all.

Also, on a total side note. This was happening for 2 years? At what point did the neighbor (or anyone else) come across this information? Shouldn't these people be held accountable if they had known this had been happening for quite a while?
This is assuming the neighbor(s) knew all this time. Considering the number of adopted children, I'll hazard a bet the neighbors knew something and didn't do anything after all this time. Either that, or the adopted parents did a hell of a job keeping the abuse of the children very "hush-hush".

It makes me wonder how law enforcement found out about this and was able to make it in time to at least attempt perform CPR on the victim. Surely, one of the neighbors no doubt?
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,167
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
Yeah, pretty sure the Bible doesn't tell you to use shock collars and imprisonment as ways of raising your child.

Just because someone does things in the name of the Bible, it isn't actually reflective of the religion. People do all kinds of things in the name of God that don't match up to the religion, because most people are ignorant enough about the doctrine to just take it as truth.

It's kinda like "I hit her because I love her", people will just lie about something people think is admirable like love to justify their terrible actions.
 

Venus of the Desert Bloom

Cosmic God
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Writing Team
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
15,494
NNID
VenusBloom
3DS FC
0318-9184-0547
I grew up in a fairly strict Christian home with two adoptive siblings. My parents must of missed that verse about incorporating shock collars in order to bring the children to heel.

I would say these two represents a very small majority of fundamentalist Christians. Hell, I wouldn't even lump them which Christians. Anyone who would lump these obvious brain dead ******* with Christians based on the statement "they were following the bible" does not equate to being Christian.
 
Top Bottom