Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
here's the thingMaven is voting me as a placeholder, Jdietz votes as an agreement to maven. Bardull votes whatever the hell he wants to vote and goes on with something else. Likely a placeholder, but he somehow pisses me off from the past games we played. Take note that I used to be a mediocre player. Now I'm just bad.
If Vinyl's actually already on three, can someone please unvote?It's just flat-out lurking and not posting anything in relation to your suspicions and etcetera. That's what bothers people, and that's why they would vote. They wouldn't vote if you're just looking around for clues, because they expect you to put up something worthwhile.
Maven is voting me as a placeholder, Jdietz votes as an agreement to maven. Bardull votes whatever the hell he wants to vote and goes on with something else. Likely a placeholder, but he somehow pisses me off from the past games we played. Take note that I used to be a mediocre player. Now I'm just bad.
Why? Do you actually have anything on Vinyl/ Laundry?people should join me in my conquest for vinyl
also people should lay off laundry, he's the homeboy
I'm fine with doing this, but also want other stuff running alongside. Inactivity is really annoying.Nope, talking about meta and roles isn't conclusive to finding scum.
Imo we should wait for Laundry to answer my question and if he doesn't respond within the next 24 hours we lynch him.
Am I or am I not?Dragon is suspicous imo.
Vinyl what the hell are you talking about realtalk.Damn these blind votes The more notes I can take on these, the better I can sum things up but the lack of it is killing me.
Why should we, on both counts (especially laundry)people should join me in my conquest for vinyl
also people should lay off laundry, he's the homeboy
Wtf no it's not, it's standard RVS procedure. I know for a fact you know better to make a big deal of that.Vinyl doesn't do things wtf
vote: RosalinaSGS that vote on Gheb then agreeing with his vote is odd as finuck. Explain.
WL got that value. personally i prefer to keep ryker/raz/WL until at least d3 in just about any game i play. he goes AFK as any alignment so his v/la doesn't make me lean either way. as far as his line of questioning towards rosalina, you could easily look at it one of two ways. first way is to look at it like he's doing standard early game pressure. to be fair, rosalina's rvs vote on gheb basically equated to jacksquat, like it didn't amount to anything because rosalina immediately threw gheb support after his rvs vote on gheb. it left me wondering if there was actually any intent behind the rvs vote or if it was just there to make him look like he was doing something. so i understand WL's PoV.Why should we, on both counts (especially laundry)
Just because I agree with one thing he says does not mean I believe he is town. (Also, what's v/la?)WL got that value. personally i prefer to keep ryker/raz/WL until at least d3 in just about any game i play. he goes AFK as any alignment so his v/la doesn't make me lean either way. as far as his line of questioning towards rosalina, you could easily look at it one of two ways. first way is to look at it like he's doing standard early game pressure. to be fair, rosalina's rvs vote on gheb basically equated to jacksquat, like it didn't amount to anything because rosalina immediately threw gheb support after his rvs vote on gheb. it left me wondering if there was actually any intent behind the rvs vote or if it was just there to make him look like he was doing something. so i understand WL's PoV.
the second way to look at it is to say 'oh WL is trying to take advantage of the situation, his interpretation seems weird.'
vinyl is odd and makes for good d1 fodder atm. also i feel like his rationale for voting for me and not you/maven is pretty arbitrary. do you have a lean on him yet?
Sure, if he doesn't post by the end of the day. Either way, we still need to generate more content before Night.So can we lynch Laundry yet? Bardull is trying his hardest to be a tool right now so his opinion should not be taken serious.
vaction/limited activity. not saying you think he is town but you did "+1" his post immediately after your rvs vote, y'know? i'm not saying you're scum for it though, just saying WL's concerns are legit.Just because I agree with one thing he says does not mean I believe he is town. (Also, what's v/la?)
>i vote for youOf course. I didn't vote on maven and Jdietz. Maven noted that I didn't keep my word and jdietz followed. Your vote was sudden with nothing else on the table and I only made the vote to push you a bit, but you don't seem to care that much about it. At least you brought up a reason this time with some pointers. For the rest, I'm sorry for my lack of common sense.
For bar, I said you somehow pissed me off back then.
You said I omgus'd you because I'm pissed at you. I was not, dude.
lmaoooo i'm sorry mah dude. the only way i'm letting a WL lynch go through is if he doesn't do shiz in the next 24 hoursSo can we lynch Laundry yet? Bardull is trying his hardest to be a tool right now so his opinion should not be taken serious.
Kursed explain this right hereThere's no such thing as a trick play on the first day.
I have, really, only gut reads, which are town on Gheb and possible scum on Bardull, though for Bardull it's solely because of the joking way he's playing which, despite Vinyl saying it's how he plays, is not something I remember from him.If he's bluffing, then definitley a suspect
But if he's truly unable to bold a post then I don't think he is a threat. Hence other roles than VT may confuse him?
Vinyl told me to post opinions/thoughts so I am. I felt as if Dragon was suspicious because he was asking how to bold his post. I believed this was just a post for activity so he could change his status and possibly lurk. If he truly knew how to bold a vote and posted just for the activity rule I would say he is a suspect. Right now my argument is really vague so I don't have anything to back myself up on it.Kursed explain this right here
Alright. That's not what I meant, however. You said I voted because I was pissed.>i vote for you
>you immediately vote for me because i voted for you
it's an OMGUS man.
More the part about him not being a threat?Vinyl told me to post opinions/thoughts so I am. I felt as if Dragon was suspicious because he was asking how to bold his post. I believed this was just a post for activity so he could change his status and possibly lurk. If he truly knew how to bold a vote and posted just for the activity rule I would say he is a suspect. Right now my argument is really vague so I don't have anything to back myself up on it.
Well, that was a guess. But I don't want to be blunt and say Dragon is stupid. I'm trying to compare the game mechanics is more complex to how to bolding a post works.More the part about him not being a threat?
I'm expecting you to respond with a statement something along the lines of "it's not that hard to type who you want to kill."By the way, this is my first online mafia game.
This would be quite a weak arguement. Merely bolding a post is almost inconsequential. We know his intentions, it's just that he merely hadn't put forward an actual vote. I did something similar in Candy mafia, where I didn't actually vote anything, but announced what I will vote. This is a quite similar, except with different purposes.Vinyl told me to post opinions/thoughts so I am. I felt as if Dragon was suspicious because he was asking how to bold his post. I believed this was just a post for activity so he could change his status and possibly lurk. If he truly knew how to bold a vote and posted just for the activity rule I would say he is a suspect. Right now my argument is really vague so I don't have anything to back myself up on it.
Yeah, Bardull really isn't doing himself any favors here. But I disagree that he deserves scummy points for it, you're giving him too much credit as a player for that imo.Alright. That's not what I meant, however. You said I voted because I was pissed.
I was not. I only voted you for a push, because your vote was sudden and you've been just as silent.
You brought up pointers, but you seem to have twist that up a bit. I'm always a little late to this and I just want to point that out.
So yeah, scummy points for you unless you tell me why you stated it like that.
When I mean harder, I'm referring to his activity. And you're right on your other points. The problem is which arguement, or which form of logic, is more applicable in a game of mafia. Do we want to lynch for the chance of hitting a mafia, or lynch for gaining more information. From my perspective, Laundry right now has about as much chance of being mafia than pretty much everyone. So we would have the same amount of chance of hitting a mafia. And, if the lynched person turns out to be innocent, we have information on other slots. If Laundry turned out to be innocent, we wouldn't have extra information, but we wouldn't have to deal with his inactivity. That's my problem. I'm not sure which is favourable to our success. Has such a tactic ever been employed in your experience?Laundry isn't among the harder slots in this game to read correctly. And even if he were it should have no impact on whether we lynch him toDay or not.
There's also no reason to assume that he will be more active later on.
Policy lynching on D1 specifically to gain information, rather than lynching someone slightly suspicious.What tactic exactly are you talking about?
Yeah, I understand and I did have trouble actually creating an argument at all tbh. I'm really just poking at people.This would be quite a weak arguement. Merely bolding a post is almost inconsequential. We know his intentions, it's just that he merely hadn't put forward an actual vote. I did something similar in Candy mafia, where I didn't actually vote anything, but announced what I will vote. This is a quite similar, except with different purposes.